Landlords have nothing to fear from the Renters’ Rights Bill – Pennycook

Landlords have nothing to fear from the Renters’ Rights Bill – Pennycook

10:21 AM, 11th September 2024, About 2 months ago 20

Text Size

Landlords shouldn’t fear the new Renters’ Rights Bill being introduced to Parliament, the housing minister Matthew Pennycook says.

Writing in the Daily Telegraph, he insists that ‘change is long overdue’.

He says that the Section 21 means that ‘millions’ of tenants ‘could be uprooted from their home with little notice and minimal justification’.

He also says that a ‘significant minority’ of renters ‘are forced to live in substandard properties’ – and they are too scared to complain.

Rights of responsible landlords

Mr Pennycook goes on: “But the Bill also recognises the rights of the majority of responsible landlords who provide quality homes to their tenants. They should know they have nothing to fear from our reforms.

“The Bill provides landlords with robust grounds for possession where there are personal reasons for wanting to take their property back, whether that be needing to sell their property or wanting to move their family members in.

“Landlords will also be able to review rents once a year, in line with the market price, with protections for tenants to challenge those increases at tribunal if they are unreasonable.”

He adds: “We know that not all tenants behave as they should – and it’s right that landlords should not have to shoulder the costs of tenants who refuse to pay their rent or put up with antisocial behaviour that makes their neighbours’ lives a misery.”

‘Labour Government is determined to succeed’

Mr Pennycook writes: “This Labour Government is determined to succeed where its predecessor failed and address the insecurity and injustice that far too many renters experience by fundamentally overhauling the regulation of the private rented sector and improving the quality of housing in it.

“The case for reform is as watertight as they come. Private rentals are currently the least affordable, poorest quality, and most insecure form of housing that exists.

“The sector is letting down responsible tenants and failing the majority of good landlords who provide a decent service to their tenants but suffer from the reputational damage caused by a disreputable minority that exploit the current system.”

Relationship between landlords and tenants

The housing minister goes on to say that the private rented sector has ‘changed beyond recognition’ since the last law for the relationship between landlords and tenants in 1988.

He adds: “The Government is moving quickly to reform the sector because tenants have waited long enough for the rights and protections they deserve and because landlords need the certainty they were denied by the previous government’s chaotic handling of its legislation.

“Our Renters’ Rights Bill will level decisively the playing field between landlord and tenant and ensure that their interests are balanced.

“It will transform the experience of private renting for tenants, giving them much greater security and stability so they can stay in their homes for longer, build lives in their communities, and avoid the risk of homelessness.”


Share This Article


Comments

Mark Alexander - Founder of Property118

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

10:54 AM, 11th September 2024, About 2 months ago

Pennycook’s assurance that landlords have "nothing to fear" is pure comedy gold. Let’s start with the repeal of Section 21. Apparently, landlords are just itching to evict tenants without reason, because that’s how we get our kicks! Now, instead of dealing with troublesome tenants swiftly and reasonably (relative in comparison to his solution), we get to look forward to even more lengthy, expensive legal battles where we’ll have to justify why we might want our own property back. Who doesn’t love the idea of spending months, maybe even years, wrangling with a system that assumes landlords are the villains of the piece?

And let’s talk about these rent disputes and tribunals. Just what every landlord dreams of—a court appearance to justify raising the rent to cover the rising costs of, you know, actually maintaining the property. I can already see myself explaining to a tribunal that boilers don’t fix themselves, while they nod sympathetically before siding with the tenant. Clearly, landlords are sitting on piles of cash and have endless free time to attend these rent-review tribunals. It’s practically a hobby!

Then there’s the "reassuring" news that we can still repossess our own properties for personal reasons. Brilliant. Except for the fact that Pennycook forgot to mention the mountains of red tape waiting to make this process as painful as possible. You want your property back to sell it, or maybe to move a family member in? No problem—just fill out these 15 forms, wait for 12 months, and hope the tenant doesn’t contest it and drag you through another round of legal chaos. Simple, right?

And the pièce de résistance: improving landlords' reputations. I nearly fell off my chair at that one. Nothing screams "trustworthy and respectable" like being portrayed as the ultimate bad guy while drowning in regulations that make running a property more complex than navigating a tax return blindfolded. How, exactly, does demonising landlords improve our reputation? I suppose in Pennycook’s world, we should be grateful for the "opportunity" to prove we’re not all scheming villains, even though we’re now stuck with more regulations, more costs, and more headaches than ever before.

In short, landlords have plenty to fear from this bill. More legal battles, more red tape, more costs, and the looming possibility that being a landlord will no longer be worth the hassle. But at least Pennycook will have his "balanced" system—just don’t ask any actual landlords what they think!

Cider Drinker

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

12:17 PM, 11th September 2024, About 2 months ago

The Bill hasn’t passed through Parliament yet. Plenty of time for the Loony Left to add their anti-landlord clauses.

Unfair taxation should be repealed. No other business is taxed on turnover rather than profit.

Regulations such as minimum EPC Ratings, EICR (and more) don’t apply to Social Housing or to owner-occupied homes.

Why would my EPC improve if I add Chinese panels to my roof but not if I get my electricity from a field of panels in Kent?

The result will be fewer private rental properties.

Sometimes, I don’t increase rent for years (11 years in one case). I will increase rents every year by the maximum allowed from today. When tenants leave, I’ll sell up. My children do not want to be landlords because government action has made the business unattractive.

I feel bullied but that’s ok, I’m a landlord. I don’t matter.

If landlords cannot legally gain possession, some will find another way. Labour may need to release the protestors to make space in our prisons for disgruntled landlords that have been pushed into criminality.

I hope Labour are enjoying their honeymoon period. They won’t be able to blame then Tories forever.

Smallfry

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

21:10 PM, 11th September 2024, About 2 months ago

Yet another lie from this government nothing to fear ?
What about the proposed right to appeal rent increases the bill proposes that the tribunal can not raise rents to above the rate proposed by the landlord and that the new rate will only take effect following the decision of the tribunal
This surely means that every tenant will appeal simply in order to delay the implementation of a rent increase the tribunal becomes swamped and decision take months and months to be made leaving the landlord receiving a rent below market rate and having to swallow the increase in costs
Ridiculous!!

Stella

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

21:12 PM, 11th September 2024, About 2 months ago

Reply to the comment left by Mark Alexander - Founder of Property118 at 11/09/2024 - 10:54
Well said!
You could not make it up, just like it was pre1988 housing act but with even more compliance, more tax and more regulation.
Who needs the hassle!

Kevin Bird

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

9:19 AM, 12th September 2024, About 2 months ago

How long does it take then for eviction of a tenant now then with out section 21 ?

Caley McKernan

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

9:29 AM, 12th September 2024, About 2 months ago

Matthew Pennycook does nothing for his current constituency regarding affordable housing .Where it is over £2500+ for a 2 bedroom. Whilst his borough is being Manhattan-ized. In order to raise revenues. As, the normal working person cannot afford those rents.
He is now preaching about landlords with market rents ??? Most people wont even be able to challenge there landlords anyway.There is no way a landlord charging big money wont have a good solicitor. Matthew Pennycook is doing what he does best. Pitying people against each other and big business and government win. Its the small portfolio landlords they want to drive out and the working class who use to actually be called the middle class.

N N

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

9:40 AM, 12th September 2024, About 2 months ago

The removal of fixed terms of any kind also seems very problematic. How can I stop Airbnb applicants just taking a cheap long let and leaving in 1or 2 months.

Keith Wellburn

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

9:59 AM, 12th September 2024, About 2 months ago

In the student HMO market removing AST and S21 will have a great impact - as was realised in all the wrangling over the Tory Renters Reform Bill.

If Labour’s equivalent goes ahead with the ability of students to leave on a whim after an initial 2 months or decide to stay on after the end of the academic year without any prior indication it will cause severe disruption to the normal yearly cycle of student tenancies - and will mean students have no certainty in securing accommodation in advance of their studies.

It’s just as stupid to treat every tenant as seeking a forever home as it is to leave those who have been in rented accommodation for many years exposed to just 2 months notice to find a new home if served a S21.

Gromit

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

10:15 AM, 12th September 2024, About 2 months ago

"Landlords have nothing to fear from the Renters’ Rights Bill – Pennycook"

...and pensioners have nothing to fear from this Labour Government.
Oops, mind that flying pig!

Northern Observer

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

10:18 AM, 12th September 2024, About 2 months ago

If he wants to create a sense of balance, then perhaps he should consider revoking Section 24.

1 2

Leave Comments

In order to post comments you will need to Sign In or Sign Up for a FREE Membership

or

Don't have an account? Sign Up

Landlord Automated Assistant Read More