9:10 AM, 12th September 2024, About 2 months ago 56
Text Size
Ben Beadle claims removing Section 21 will not be “a significant change for landlords.”
In an interview with BBC Radio 4 Today Programme, the chief executive of the National Residential Landlords Association, said: “It’s unreasonable for landlords to issue a Section 21 without a decent reason.”
His comments come after the Renters’ Rights Bill which is set to be introduced in Parliament will ban Section 21 evictions for new and existing tenancies as soon as it becomes law.
Mr Beadle told the programme that he understands why the government wants to ban Section 21.
He said: “I understand the threat of Section 21 hanging over people’s heads where landlords don’t need to give a reason.
“I fully understand why the government is removing Section 21. I think we need to understand that we shouldn’t push the needle too far.
“While it’s unreasonable for landlords to issue Section 21 without a decent reason, I would argue that if you have a good tenant, you will want to keep them in the property.”
Mr Beadle then goes on to claim that despite a ban, this wouldn’t be a significant change.
He said: “This shouldn’t be a significant change for landlords all they want is an alternative to be effective for dealing with things like anti-social behaviour, rent arrears and selling a property.”
Emma Barnett, the show’s presenter, asked Mr Beadle about plans to limit rent increases under the Renters’ Rights Bill.
She claimed there are fears that “unaffordable rent rises will become another form of no-fault eviction”.
The Bill aims to ban rent increases during a tenancy, allowing landlords to raise rent only once a year and only to the market rate.
Mr Beadle says many tenants don’t realise they can challenge rent increases.
He said: “I have no issue with tenants having access to justice. Tenants can already challenge unfair rent increases through the First Tier Tribunal, so this isn’t new, but many don’t even know it’s an option.”
According to Mr Beadle, more homes need to be built to ease demand with on average 17 tenants applying to rent one property.
He said: “Until we deal with the core issue of a lack of supply in the sector that’s not going to get better through these changes in some respects it may well get worse because it will force good landlords out of the sector.”
Ms Barnett asked what is driving the behaviour of some landlords in the private rented sector.
Mr Beadle says due to a lack of enforcement, many criminal landlords are simply able to get away with bad behaviour.
He said: “I think there is a lack of enforcement. Local authorities have been absolutely decimated in the past decade with regards to funding, and that simply means the vast majority of landlords have been doing a good job, do care about their tenants, and have much greater satisfaction ratings in the private rented sector than in social housing.”
Mr Beadle expressed some concerns about the Renters’ Rights Bill, emphasising the importance of good landlords in the sector.
He said: “What we don’t want to do is drive the good landlords out of the sector and leave the bad ones behind.
“Whatever these changes are going to look like we need to see a greater investment in enforcement in the sector.”
You can listen to the full interview here from 1 hr 15 mins.
Previous Article
Fleet and TMW both announce lower BTL rates
dismayed landlord
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up18:49 PM, 24th September 2024, About 2 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Fernando at 24/09/2024 - 18:30
Very well put.
dismayed landlord
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up18:54 PM, 24th September 2024, About 2 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Fernando at 24/09/2024 - 18:30
Just quit paying the fees. No demand - no business. Or join a tenant support group ? May as well ‘cos this lot do not represent landlords.
TheMaluka
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up9:41 AM, 25th September 2024, About 2 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Fernando at 24/09/2024 - 18:30
When there are no members he will stand down by default.
Ian Narbeth
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up12:08 PM, 26th September 2024, About 2 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Steve Masters at 12/09/2024 - 17:02
Steve, I encourage landlords to issue money claims on line for persistent late payers. Yes, there is a cost in terms of your time and application fees but it will hurt the tenant's credit score. Tell the tenant that every time he is late you will issue a claim. Unless you do that, the tenant suffers no real disbenefit and you waste a day in court with an unsympathetic judge.
GlanACC
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up17:33 PM, 26th September 2024, About 2 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Ian Narbeth at 26/09/2024 - 12:08
Having worked for a credit reference agency, I can tell you that you only need to do it once. Even one CCJ for a reasonable amount will scupper the debtor for 6 years.
Ian Narbeth
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up18:32 PM, 26th September 2024, About 2 months ago
Reply to the comment left by GlanACC at 26/09/2024 - 17:33
Thanks GlanACC. Looks like that is the way to go, especially as Angela wants to allow tenants to build up 13 weeks of arrears.
Desert Rat
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up4:43 AM, 27th September 2024, About 2 months ago
The RLA went down hill when they merged with the NRA and became the NRLA. I''m still a member and they offer good advice but they no longer support landlords. They may as well be part of Shelter. Beedle really does need to go and they need to get someone with a set of B**s to stand up and fight for it's members while there is still a PRS.
I think that they need to realize that when we sell up they are out of a job.
moneymanager
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up8:17 AM, 2nd October 2024, About 2 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Robert at 12/09/2024 - 10:52
The PRS will be corporatised, not only the fince-build-manage operation but ordinary houses, in the US, Blackrock is buying tens of thousands of distress (enforced) sales and letting them back to the former owner.
In the USSR housing was allocated, you couldn't leave your area unless you had an internal passport (digutal ID and 15 minute cities?).
GlanACC
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up8:32 AM, 2nd October 2024, About 2 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Desert Rat at 27/09/2024 - 04:43
I am still a member of NRLA and basically use it for landlord advice and forms, which they are very good for. Unfortunately the NRLA has realised it can milk landlords now and seems to have monetised itself. It says it is the voice of the landlord, and to be fair it probably represents more landlords than other landlord organisations HOWEVER it is NOT a democratic organisation and landlords have little say in the running of it.
Chris Brown
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up13:20 PM, 8th October 2024, About a month ago
I object to the NRLA repesenting itself as spokesperson for private landlords. Beadle does not speak for me.
I have invested savings and time and effort in rehabilitating failing properties to provide comfortable accommodation for anyone to ent who will pay the rent and respect the property and their neighbours.
Our recent crop of vote mongering would be politicians have completely unbalanced the relationship between Landlords and Tenants.
So now it's deep referencing, guarantors and increased rents for all to cover the risk of admitting a bad tenant.
And why oh why is it a one tenancy form to fit all types of tenant? If I have plans to undertake significant work in a year's time, why am I to be prevented from a fixed tem tenancy?