9:37 AM, 23rd August 2024, About 3 days ago 19
Text Size
Every private landlord in the country must know that their local council is hopeless and doesn’t understand the private rented sector – but did you know that they couldn’t run a bath?
I’m talking, of course, about the not-so-shocking news that another private landlord organisation created by a council has hit the buffers.
So, well done to Reading Council for blowing council taxpayers’ money on buying homes to rent out, creating a business to run the portfolio and then making a hash of it.
You see running a property portfolio with tenants isn’t as easy as it looks, is it?
We have to meet lots of legislation, keep a property safe for tenants and deal with clueless council staff.
But when the boot is on the other foot you really don’t know the first thing about a) running a business for profit (it takes hard work), and b) being a landlord.
I can’t be bothered researching how well council homes are run – I read enough on Property118 to know that councils can’t deal with their own portfolio – and they have lots of cash as well.
I suspect having to respond to tenant complaints in a timely fashion was an inconvenience. Like Clarion taking FOUR YEARS to fix a window. You simply can’t do that in the PRS.
You could try but the council jobsworths would be down on you like a tonne of bricks. Oh, wait.
Like I said, they can’t run a bath. And if they did, it would either leak or be in the wrong house.
And just like Nottingham City Council and its NCH Enterprises fiasco, it’s the tenants that pay the price with eviction.
But hold on, doesn’t this beg a serious question?
Will Reading Council be telling the tenants of its own private landlord provider to stay put until the bailiffs come knocking?
Are they pointing the tenants to the services of Shelter?
If not, why not? This is what they would do when a private landlord wanting possession would be facing.
(NOTE: If you are a Homes for Reading tenant, please, please take advice and don’t leave the property when they tell you to. Only settle for a council house in fair exchange – probably the one you are in that’s being transferred to the council).
Also, my old friend Angela Rayner might get her act together and ban section 21 ‘no-fault’ eviction notices when the Renters’ Rights Bill appears later this year.
That would scupper the council’s bid to gain vacant possession by 2026 when the last tenancies end.
Or am I being churlish?
As a private company, the landlord must comply with the law.
It would be great to see some of the tenants get to court and claim hardship – and have the judge agree they can remain.
It’s also hilarious that a council-run business can’t make money from the rents – so will replace those tenants with renters paying even less.
Please help me make sense of this.
I appreciate that there will be ’emergency workers’ getting a house, but there will be others on benefits.
So, the council will use its own resources (ie our cash) to make up the shortfall.
And what of the employees? Will they be laid off or reemployed by the council?
Whichever it is, I’m guessing that the exposure to working in the real world, that’s when stuff needs to get done, has been a wake-up call.
Running a business takes effort and commitment, looking after tenants takes effort and commitment – and you’ll get no thanks for it.
Of course, I imagine that if a private landlord decided to evict 94 families it would make the national news. Oi BBC, where are you?
Then we have councils taking control of a landlord’s properties – good luck to Merton Council
That’s a brave move to run HMOs without any landlording experience and, I guess, there will be some council staff in for a rude awakening.
Though I did laugh at Phil Turtle’s accurate take that council staff are ‘completely incompetent to actually manage an HMO’.
They have no idea how they work, absolutely none, so let’s hope this works out after the tenants weren’t treated too well by a landlord who gives us all a bad name.
The bottom line for all landlords and those who want to get on board is that landlording isn’t a passive investment opportunity. It really isn’t.
Even if you hand off the day-to-day responsibility to an agent, there are still a lot of things for you to do.
It won’t be like Homes for Reading which got to spend other people’s cash and still fail.
The big difference here is that councils tell landlords wanting possession for selling or they can’t pay the higher mortgage, that a landlord’s problems have nothing to do with the tenant.
So, what have these tenants in Reading done to be treated like this?
Reading Council speaks like the whole endeavour is an open and shut case.
If the tenants organise themselves, they can remain in their homes until a judge agrees to possession.
Unless there’s something tricky in the tenancy agreement that means you can do nowt.
Hey, Reading Council, will you like how it feels? Feeling sore and betrayed by the legal process?
Join the club, hun. Run a bath to calm yourselves down.
Until next time,
The Landlord Crusader
Previous Article
Holiday let landlords face tax crunchNext Article
Property118 Incorporation Client Speaks Out
Stella
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up10:23 AM, 23rd August 2024, About 3 days ago
Spot on!
Hamish McLay
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up10:24 AM, 23rd August 2024, About 3 days ago
We see again the inability of governments, local or national, to collaborate with experts in the housing arena.
Private Landlords, given the opportunity by local government to discuss the usefulness of HMOs and letting generally, would solve major issues.
Local government is too keen on controlling Private Landlords rather than having discussions and encouraging them to do what they are good at. Private Landlords are a massive help to councils in providing housing.
By collaborating, those Councils could relieve some of the pressure on their serious housing mess. Trying to control and regulate experienced and effective Private Landlords, as both central and local governments try to do, only exacerbates this severe issue.
nekillim200
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up10:49 AM, 23rd August 2024, About 3 days ago
Brilliant!!!!!
Unloved Landlord
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up10:50 AM, 23rd August 2024, About 3 days ago
Seems like everything is Two Tier now
Judith Wordsworth
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up11:00 AM, 23rd August 2024, About 3 days ago
They used to efficient, well in the 60’s-70’s. Maybe education was better!
Councils, only know about English ones, even had a running programme for redecoration of their Council owned and managed properties ie every year one room was redecorated at no cost to tenants.
It’s too much farming out and not enough in house, badly educated employees, lack of common sense - ok so common sense has been bred out lol.
Tim Rogers
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up11:06 AM, 23rd August 2024, About 3 days ago
Not forgetting of course, that Reading are intending to implement selective licensing in 3 wards, 2 of which surround the university the third is the ever popular 'Battle area that includes the wonderful Oxford Road. The reason given is the high concentration of rentals in the areas.
As far as I can see that's not a permitted criteria according to the government guidance. Anyone know for sure?
Cider Drinker
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up11:36 AM, 23rd August 2024, About 3 days ago
Reply to the comment left by Judith Wordsworth at 23/08/2024 - 11:00In the 60s and 70s Councils had a good mix of tenants. They had some really good tenants and some really bad tenants. Many would do their own improvements to make their homes comfortable; some would choose to live in squalor.
Then came Thatcher.
The really good tenants bought their homes at heavily discounted prices. This left the Councils with a larger proportion of bad tenants. Bad tenants are stress-inducing and expensive.
Unable to manage their properties (due to the bad tenants, a Councils gifted their property portfolio to (ahem) not-for-profit housing associations.
The Housing Act affords housing associations lots of concessions.
Speaking from experience, housing association properties are very distinctive in their appearance. Broken gates and fences, cigarette-stained windows and curtains, overgrown, unkempt gardens. I’d be ashamed to own their properties.
TheMaluka
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up11:49 AM, 23rd August 2024, About 3 days ago
I know of one council run block of flats that is notorious for drug dealing, sin and iniquity. Often cited as the worst run block in the area.
Robert M
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up11:50 AM, 23rd August 2024, About 3 days ago
The failure of councils to be able to effectively run projects that are, in effect, letting and management agents for private rented housing, is widespread and there are examples of this from around the country.
This is of course with the benefit of taxpayer money to prop up their operational costs, plus a much less regulated operating environment (should be the same enforcement criteria as for private landlords, but as councils are the prosecutors, they are obviously not going to prosecute themselves).
Hamish McLay
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up12:08 PM, 23rd August 2024, About 3 days ago
Reply to the comment left by Cider Drinker at 23/08/2024 - 11:36
sadly too, they can have very offensive and inconsiderate tenants - we have one next to us
I say "one", it is, however, many. It is more like an HMO with 3 separate families and multinational. They must be making a fortune out of the alleged "social" housing. Sociable for them of course. and naturally a seriously annoying barking dog!