West Bromwich Building Society Tracker Margins Legal Action

West Bromwich Building Society Tracker Margins Legal Action

18:38 PM, 30th September 2013, About 11 years ago 3869

Text Size

West Bromwich Tracker Rate Mortgages Legal Action Group

West Bromwich Building Society Tracker Margins Legal Action

Are you affected by the West Brom Tracker Rate Hike?

If your mortgage account number begins with the number 8 you are highly likely to be one of the unlucky 41% of the mortgage customers of the West Bromwich building Society with a West Bromwich Mortgage Company account affected by the 1.9% increase in your tracker margin rate. However, if you arranged your mortgage directly with West Bromwich Building Society (i.e. not via a broker) or before 2006 the chances are that your account number will begin with the number 9 and you are not affected – YET!!! West Brom will give no assurances that mortgages with account numbers beginning with the number 9 will not be affected at some point in the future.

OUR INTENDED CLASS ACTION LITIGATION OVERVIEW

Tracker Rate Class Actions Updates

The reasons we started this campaign are very simple:-

1) We believe the actions of West Brom are immoral

2) We believe the actions of West Brom are unlawful, i.e. they have no legal grounds to increase their tracker rate margins

3) We have no wish to subsidise other areas of the West Bromwich Building Society business model

4) We are fearful of other lenders following suit if West Brom are allowed to get away with this

Mark Smith (Barrister-At-Law) said …

“Representative actions, where one person starts a case representing many others, who all want the answer to a legal question from a court such as ‘is this contract enforceable against me?’ but are not seeking damages. All those who sign up to the action will get the benefit of the win, but they do not have to start their own cases, as they are ‘represented’ by the lead claimant.

The only people who will definitely benefit from success in the case are those who have signed up. There will be no free rides. Any others will have to fight their own corners individually, either alone or with legal help (which will inevitably cost significantly more than the group case).”

We will NOT settle on any basis.

Landlords take legal action against West Brom Mortgage Company

We have a moral duty to do what is right for those who support the values upon which this campaign was started. Our promise to all who support these values is that we will not sell out on you at any price. We will continue to fight this injustice and we will fight any other lender who tries to follow suit.

Are you with us?

This discussion thread is now closed – we’re off to Court!

To link to the new discussion please CLICK HERE

West Bromwich Mortgage Company Tracker Margins Legal Action


Share This Article


Comments

Dean

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

16:47 PM, 27th November 2013, About 11 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "Richard Adams" at "27/11/2013 - 16:43":

Nice one Richard . Im sure everyone appreciates you giving up a day to put the word out

Fingers crossed a few more join up in the next week or so as a result of your efforts

Mark Alexander - Founder of Property118

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

16:48 PM, 27th November 2013, About 11 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "The Man From Nowhere" at "27/11/2013 - 12:33":

It is £240 for each AFFECTED mortgage you wish to be included in claims on. There is no point registering unaffected accounts at this stage.
.

Mark Alexander - Founder of Property118

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

17:00 PM, 27th November 2013, About 11 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "Onslow Clough" at "27/11/2013 - 16:23":

Justin updates the forum on funds collected and number of cases every Friday
.

Mark Alexander - Founder of Property118

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

17:03 PM, 27th November 2013, About 11 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "Richard Adams" at "27/11/2013 - 16:43":

Well done Richard and thank you on behalf of us all 🙂
.

The Man From Nowhere

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

17:07 PM, 27th November 2013, About 11 years ago

Just in case there are people reading this board still harbouring doubts about the strength of our legal case (despite all my previous postings), there's also the case of Gold Group Properties Ltd v BDW Trading Ltd (formerly known as Barratt Homes Limited) [2010] EWHC 323 (TCC). Although this case relates to the doctrine of frustration, it is important to note that the case reiterates the principle as in Tandrin Aviation (a case on force majeure clauses) that the law should not be used to allow a party to escape from a bad bargain, which was the situation in these cases. If a party has lost money as a result of the contract, then, unless there are express terms to the contrary, this loss is theirs to suffer. It does not matter if a contract is unprofitable or uneconomic, or even severely uneconomic to perform, for the loss must be borne by the party that made the bad bargain.

Gold had entered into an agreement with BDW (formerly Barratt Homes) to build some properties on Gold’s land. BDW would pay minimum fee per property and the parties would share revenue. The contract also had a good faith provision under which: the parties agreed with each other that all transactions entered into between the parties would be conducted in good faith; each party should at all times act in good faith towards the other and use all reasonable endeavours to ensure observance of the agreement; and neither party would seek to increase its profit or reduce its losses at the other’s expense.

The credit crunch came along and there were delays by BDW, culminating in Gold purporting to accept BDW’s repudiatory breach of the contract. The High Court agreed with Gold. However, BDW alleged that Gold’s refusal to agree to renegotiate the deal including the minimum prices (to allow the contract to continue after the credit crunch) amounted to a breach of the duty of good faith. The High Court said that was not what was intended by the good faith obligation. Good faith required parties to observe reasonable commercial standards of fair dealing and faithfulness to the agreed common purpose and consistent with the justified expectations of the other party. It did not require one party to renegotiate a contract because the other had made a bad bargain. The duty did not require Gold to give up a freely negotiated financial advantage. The contract also expressly stated that neither party would increase their profits or reduce their losses at the other’s expense.

Paul Gershlick, a Partner at Matthew Arnold & Baldwin LLP and editor of Upload-IT, commented: ‘With the economic downturn, we have seen a lot of people want to get out of agreements that had been entered into in the good times but which did not seem quite so good when the economic climate deteriorated. This is the latest in the line of cases where the courts have shown an unwillingness to interfere to help someone get out of what had become a bad bargain."

Anyone else experiencing a strong sense of Deja vu in respect of the above?

Andy Bell

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

17:13 PM, 27th November 2013, About 11 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "Richard Adams" at "27/11/2013 - 16:43":

Well done Richard.
To all who might have missed it the Leaflet it is linked to in the main article. If it works as well as Richard says - get it out there, in print or PDF via email.

Appalled Landlord

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

17:20 PM, 27th November 2013, About 11 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "Richard Adams" at "27/11/2013 - 16:43":

Well done Richard!

Tomorrow is the last day of the last show that Landlord & Letting Magazine are putting on this year. They have not published next year's details yet.

However, there may be other shows for landlords run by someone else. And there are landlord meetings arranged regularly by local councils, and by the NLA.

These provide a relevant target audience who may be glad of the information contained in the flyers linked to the To Do List at the top of this page, if anyone feels like handing them out.

ian

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

17:28 PM, 27th November 2013, About 11 years ago

On the forth day WB then wrote to me discounting my tracker so I could buy a tree.
On the last day Justin said to us, they are eating humble pie.

Richard Adams

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

17:29 PM, 27th November 2013, About 11 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "Appalled Landlord" at "27/11/2013 - 17:20":

Thanks. I'm on Landlords & Lettings mailing list now so when 2014 dates and venues are announced I'll post them here.

The Man From Nowhere

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

17:32 PM, 27th November 2013, About 11 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "Mark Alexander" at "27/11/2013 - 16:48":

What would be the situation regarding the West Brom's currently non-affected BTL trackers as far as the class action is concerned if the West Brom then hike the rates on their non-affected BTL trackers with mortgage account numbers beginning with 9? Would those mortgage accounts beginning with 9 also be covered by the class action provided you have paid £240 for each affected BTL tracker (those mortgage accounts beginning with 8)?

Or will we cross that bridge if, or when, such a scenario transpires?

Leave Comments

In order to post comments you will need to Sign In or Sign Up for a FREE Membership

or

Don't have an account? Sign Up

Landlord Tax Planning Book Now