West Bromwich Building Society Tracker Margins Legal Action

West Bromwich Building Society Tracker Margins Legal Action

18:38 PM, 30th September 2013, About 11 years ago 3869

Text Size

West Bromwich Tracker Rate Mortgages Legal Action Group

West Bromwich Building Society Tracker Margins Legal Action

Are you affected by the West Brom Tracker Rate Hike?

If your mortgage account number begins with the number 8 you are highly likely to be one of the unlucky 41% of the mortgage customers of the West Bromwich building Society with a West Bromwich Mortgage Company account affected by the 1.9% increase in your tracker margin rate. However, if you arranged your mortgage directly with West Bromwich Building Society (i.e. not via a broker) or before 2006 the chances are that your account number will begin with the number 9 and you are not affected – YET!!! West Brom will give no assurances that mortgages with account numbers beginning with the number 9 will not be affected at some point in the future.

OUR INTENDED CLASS ACTION LITIGATION OVERVIEW

Tracker Rate Class Actions Updates

The reasons we started this campaign are very simple:-

1) We believe the actions of West Brom are immoral

2) We believe the actions of West Brom are unlawful, i.e. they have no legal grounds to increase their tracker rate margins

3) We have no wish to subsidise other areas of the West Bromwich Building Society business model

4) We are fearful of other lenders following suit if West Brom are allowed to get away with this

Mark Smith (Barrister-At-Law) said …

“Representative actions, where one person starts a case representing many others, who all want the answer to a legal question from a court such as ‘is this contract enforceable against me?’ but are not seeking damages. All those who sign up to the action will get the benefit of the win, but they do not have to start their own cases, as they are ‘represented’ by the lead claimant.

The only people who will definitely benefit from success in the case are those who have signed up. There will be no free rides. Any others will have to fight their own corners individually, either alone or with legal help (which will inevitably cost significantly more than the group case).”

We will NOT settle on any basis.

Landlords take legal action against West Brom Mortgage Company

We have a moral duty to do what is right for those who support the values upon which this campaign was started. Our promise to all who support these values is that we will not sell out on you at any price. We will continue to fight this injustice and we will fight any other lender who tries to follow suit.

Are you with us?

This discussion thread is now closed – we’re off to Court!

To link to the new discussion please CLICK HERE

West Bromwich Mortgage Company Tracker Margins Legal Action


Share This Article


Comments

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

16:29 PM, 18th November 2013, About 11 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "Mark Alexander" at "18/11/2013 - 11:08":

so... would it be possible then to find Aug/Sept (or maybe a couple of months before) 2006???

David Lawrenson

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

16:31 PM, 18th November 2013, About 11 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "Mark Alexander" at "18/11/2013 - 16:21":

Yes, Mark
And these clowns will probably one day enjoy an indexed linked pension too...just to rub salt in the wounds.
Time for all of us reading this to sit down with a cold towel on head in a darkened room and be read a nice story from a nurse, before we all go mad.

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

16:31 PM, 18th November 2013, About 11 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "Dean Turner" at "18/11/2013 - 11:38":

I sent an e mail directly back saying they need to answer the questions we asked

Addicted to fighting the WBBS

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

16:32 PM, 18th November 2013, About 11 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "Mark Alexander" at "18/11/2013 - 16:26":

Ok then, it is a joke, the only two remaining firms I can think of is SOCA and our local PC !

Mark Alexander - Founder of Property118

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

16:46 PM, 18th November 2013, About 11 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "Denise Doms" at "18/11/2013 - 16:29":

Hi Denise

Below is a link to everything the Wayback Machine has on the West Brom BS website.

Just pick your date and away you go 🙂

http://web.archive.org/web/20060201000000*/http://westbrom.co.uk
.

Incensed Landlord

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

16:49 PM, 18th November 2013, About 11 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "Dean Turner" at "18/11/2013 - 15:40":

Here here, Dean! It smacks of cowardice, doesn't it? Even though different departments deal with different things, it seems that they forever create more 'departments' (I presume in a bid to broaden the spread covered) but somehow they fail to encompass and close any glaring gaps or loopholes. The regulation of buy-to-let seems to be one such case, does it not?
How come every other Tom, Dick or Harry's covered (it seems) but not buy-to-lets, and moreover landlords and landladies?
So, who exactly DO we approach, as for how I see things, this is clearly a case of miss-selling! Or would that be misdescription? Either way surely the ASA, at the very least, should be legally required to step in. No one should be allowed to pass the buck UNLESS it's with the agreement of whoever they pass the buck to taking full responsibility. In other words, it be the responsibility of whomever we pass this to, to either deal with it themselves, or if not, then for THEM to ensure that we are properly dealt with by another department; so in any event we ARE properly represented and dealt with.
This dismissive approach really isn't good enough, and should not even be an option. These people should have a legal DUTY to handle and deal with this matter, no matter whose table it first lands on. I suppose currently there isn't the infrastructure or legal framework in place to ensure this happens. However, as things stand, this really isn't good enough.
The scatter gun approach that Mark is employing is the best option I feel; and it's good to have the correspondence displayed for public consumption too. We, the audience, get to know more of what's going on, as well as making it more difficult for the respondents to wriggle out (at least I hope so!).
To my mind, irrespective of whether this is a non-regulated product, the ASA SHOULD get involved, as what's at stake here is blatantly misguiding people - both 'professional' landlords as much as 'non-professional' ones. This really is starting to make me feel sick with anger!

Tony the hairdresser

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

16:52 PM, 18th November 2013, About 11 years ago

****Headline grabber is a 1.99% two year tracker BBR + 1.49% until 30/11/2015 with a maximum 60% Loan to Value and a 2.5%… ****

IS THIS UNTIL THEY REALISE THEY'VE GOT THEIR BUSINESS MODEL WRONG AND PUT THEIR TRACKER RATE UP!!!

Mark Alexander - Founder of Property118

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

17:03 PM, 18th November 2013, About 11 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "Tony the hairdresser " at "18/11/2013 - 16:52":

Caveat emptor Tony - I doubt any of us would do that deal without reading the T&C's in great detail. Fortunately the Principality Building Society have always honoured their deals up to now though, unlike others of course! I particularly like the idea of combining that deal with a 20% equity loan tyop up - however, this is thread drift, see the link below to discuss the Principality product please.
.

Mark Alexander - Founder of Property118

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

17:03 PM, 18th November 2013, About 11 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "Tony the hairdresser " at "18/11/2013 - 16:52":

Caveat emptor Tony - I doubt any of us would do that deal without reading the T&C's in great detail. Fortunately the Principality Building Society have always honoured their deals up to now, unlike the cowboys from the Wild West of course! I particularly like the idea of combining that deal with a 20% equity loan top up - however, this is thread drift, see the link below to discuss the Principality product please.
.

Incensed Landlord

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

17:19 PM, 18th November 2013, About 11 years ago

Just to let it be known that just today we have told one of our managing agents to serve notice on one of our tenant couples in one of our properties - a young couple who seem nicely settled in, and enjoying their tenancy (the whole place redecorated before they moved in, keeping standards up as any good landlord should). This was regrettable but we have no choice: because of West Brom's avaricious action, the mortgage on this property will rise by over £160pm. We don't make a lot profit from this property anyway, and this will not just wipe out any profit, but we'll be into negative territory.
So an early casualty, sad to say. So our tenants are also paying the price, and I'm sure many others will follow suit. The rental market is already under-subscribed in the area, so this will only put further pressure on this. We cannot hold out in hope that we win this case, for we must give notice now, just before the two month's notice we are required to give before the end of their tenancy. If we pass this window of opportunity, then we'll have to fund the mortgage in the meantime, which we just can't afford.
When will the media wake up and support landlords, for once, when it's clear that tenants are now going to suffer at the hands of these unscrupulous lenders.

Leave Comments

In order to post comments you will need to Sign In or Sign Up for a FREE Membership

or

Don't have an account? Sign Up

Landlord Automated Assistant Read More