10:00 AM, 5th April 2024, About 8 months ago 22
Text Size
News that the Government is tweaking the Renters (Reform) Bill has been welcomed by landlords everywhere, not so much by the usual suspects, but this awful legislation really needs sinking.
The proposed changes, including the abolition of section 21 ‘no-fault’ evictions, do nothing to help the private rented sector (PRS) and only contribute to rising rents for tenants.
Homeless charity Shelter may condemn the government for this move to ‘water down’ proposals, but it’s their influence that’s leading to the abolition of Section 21.
This may be seen as a victory for campaigners and rogue tenants, but it’s a blow to the many responsible landlords who provide quality homes.
The consequences of this Bill could lead to an exodus of landlords from the PRS. And who will be blamed for this? The landlords, of course.
But let’s consider the facts. The number of landlords leaving the PRS is already on the rise. Is this what Shelter had in mind?
Interestingly, many tenants haven’t even heard of the Renters (Reform) Bill. Yet, campaign groups like Shelter claim tenants are clamouring for change.
Are most tenants really facing the issues these groups claim?
It’s also a worry that most landlords aren’t aware of the details of a Bill that effectively hands control from the property owner to the renter. This is unbelievable.
It’s concerning too when critics condemn Tory MPs for requesting amendments to the Bill. If these MPs are landlords, they bring invaluable experience to the table.
These MPs also represent large numbers of tenants and understand that pushing through legislation opposed by landlords will lead to increased homelessness and sky-high temporary housing bills, potentially bankrupting many councils.
This week, yet another survey revealed that tenants are happy with their rented homes. Did this make the national news? Of course not.
It’s easier for groups like Crisis to grab headlines with their ‘version’ of the truth.
Let’s not forget that the main cause of homelessness is a lack of council housing. And the leading cause of Section 21 evictions is rent arrears, damage to a property, or anti-social behaviour.
The anti-landlord lobby has hijacked the argument on abolishing fixed-term tenancies with their talk of abolishing ‘no-fault’ evictions. If fixed-term contracts are a bad thing, why don’t they just say that? I guess they’d rather play games.
The Renters (Reform) Bill uses a broad brush to tar all landlords, both good and bad, with the same brush. Instead of penalising landlords, the time, effort and money should be spent on addressing the issue of bad landlords.
Let’s remove them from our industry and allow good landlords to continue providing quality homes to their tenants.
Unfortunately, this solution may be too simplistic for those pushing for the Renters (Reform) Bill – especially when there are already lots of laws in place to control the PRS.
Let’s focus on weeding out bad landlords (but not with useless selective licensing, obvs) while allowing good ones to continue providing much-needed housing for our communities.
But I’m left thinking: Are we in a situation whereby the heavily funded critics of landlords are creating a self-fulfilling prophecy?
Will they achieve their aims – claiming they represent tenants everywhere – while decimating the PRS? Will landlords remain to see what actually happens?
Or will we be watching from the sidelines having sold our rented houses, rents have rocketed, and tenants have nowhere to live and the government and Shelter, Crisis and Generation Rent are looking at their feet?
The bogeyman you have ridiculed, undermined and destroyed may well have the last laugh.
Except no one will be laughing because the situation you’ve created will be too awful to contemplate.
Perhaps the only silver lining is there won’t be a need for these campaign groups in the future because there won’t be any tenants to campaign for. Oh, the bittersweet irony.
Until next time,
The Landlord Crusader
Previous Article
UK house price growth slows after five months of rises
Monty Bodkin
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up17:31 PM, 5th April 2024, About 8 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Cider Drinker at 05/04/2024 - 12:30
"I use the government’s Model AST. It includes a clause that allows me to sell, even during the fixed term."
Not quite. It's a break clause that allows the landlord to use section 21 after 6 months if they wish to sell. Which they could do anyway with a standard 6 month AST.
Cider Drinker
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up18:59 PM, 5th April 2024, About 8 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Monty Bodkin at 05/04/2024 - 17:31
I think giving a tenant six months without fear of losing their home is perfectly reasonable. TBH, I’m surprised that landlords can seek to evict a tenant during a fixed term.
Monty Bodkin
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up22:39 PM, 5th April 2024, About 8 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Cider Drinker at 05/04/2024 - 18:59
TBH, I'm surprised if you are really a landlord.
No tenant gets legally evicted within six months.
And you clearly don't understand the crap Government Model AST you claim to use.
-That no competent landlord would actually use.
Cider Drinker
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up8:20 AM, 6th April 2024, About 8 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Monty Bodkin at 05/04/2024 - 22:39
You sound unnecessarily aggressive. I know plenty of landlords that use the model AST.
Is there anything(s) in particular in the model AST that you object to?
I offer fixed terms of one to three years although, more recently, I’ve reduced the maximum to just two years because of political and economic uncertainty or if my own health deteriorated.
My position is that if a tenant became difficult, I’d seek possession in order to sell.
Grumpy Doug
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up8:21 AM, 6th April 2024, About 8 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Stella at 05/04/2024 - 12:41
"To think that a conservative government are happy to get rid of section 21 makes me think that they have a hidden agenda to enable BTR to take over."
Of course that's the agenda, in the same way that they are using IR35 to destroy the small contractor market in favour of the corporates ... Rishi's father in law springs to mind.
Unfortunately for them, the BTR market is very small in proportion (about 5% of the PRS in number of units) and they've hit the reality of high finance costs, high material costs, and the costs and availability of labour. BTR at best will take a long to impact the market.
Monty Bodkin
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up9:15 AM, 6th April 2024, About 8 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Cider Drinker at 06/04/2024 - 08:20
"I know plenty of landlords that use the model AST."
No you don't.
It is used by amateurs stumbling on a freebie, the chances of you knowing plenty of them is infinitesimal.
Monty Bodkin
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up21:03 PM, 6th April 2024, About 8 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Monty Bodkin at 06/04/2024 - 09:15
"Do not feed the Troll."
I've been posting on here for 10 years with consistent landlord views and landlording knowledge.
Comparatively you've been posting on here for 10 minutes with some strange landlord views and displaying basic landlording ignorance.
Just at the time when the awful Renters (Reform) Bill is teetering on the edge.
Monty Bodkin
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up21:14 PM, 6th April 2024, About 8 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Cider Drinker at 06/04/2024 - 19:17
In case anyone needs reminding, you posted;
"The PRS needs reform.
Tenants deserve a better deal."
Which is a claptrap anti-landlord soundbite hurting most tenants.
Tarek Landoulsi
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up15:19 PM, 7th April 2024, About 8 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Monty Bodkin at 05/04/2024 - 10:42
Rent will go even higher and the landlords become picky on selecting tenants
Cider Drinker
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up19:49 PM, 7th April 2024, About 8 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Monty Bodkin at 06/04/2024 - 21:14
My last reply to you.
Yes, I posted that. There was also lots more to read that explained how tenants could be more secure in their homes - by making it more attractive for landlords.
You’ve been posting for a decade. The Tories have been in power for 14 years and look what they’ve achieved.
The PRS needs reform. You surely cannot believe that the PRS is working well.
Tenants deserve a better deal. I stand by that point. The way to deliver a better deal is to make it more attractive for landlords to operate within the PRS.