7:00 AM, 27th October 2024, About 2 months ago 8
Text Size
What if the UK’s Private Rented Sector (PRS)—once a thriving backbone of housing for millions of people—collapsed overnight? It might sound far-fetched, but the signs are already there. Landlords are leaving the market in droves, overwhelmed by crushing tax changes, impossible regulations, and rising costs. The very fabric of the UK housing market is unraveling, and the consequences could be catastrophic.
If we don’t act now, we could be on the brink of one of the biggest housing crises the UK has ever seen. And here’s what that collapse could look like…
Picture this: Millions of tenants scrambling to find somewhere—anywhere—to live. The number of available rental properties has plummeted, and the fierce competition for what’s left has driven rents through the roof.
Families, professionals, students—nobody is safe. Entire communities are priced out, forced to compete for tiny, overpriced flats. The rental crisis quickly spirals out of control, leaving thousands on the brink of homelessness.
For tenants already living paycheck to paycheck, the collapse of the PRS would be a disaster. Affordable rentals? A thing of the past. Housing insecurity would skyrocket as tenants are pushed out of their homes, unable to keep up with the soaring rents.
The collapse of the PRS would put crippling pressure on social housing, and let’s be honest—it’s already on its knees. Council waiting lists would explode, leaving families trapped in temporary accommodation for years. But here’s the kicker: there just aren’t enough social housing units to go around.
This isn’t just an inconvenience—it’s a national emergency. As local authorities scramble to provide shelter, the reality is simple: there will be nowhere to put people. Overcrowding, substandard living conditions, and deepening poverty are the inevitable consequences of a PRS in ruins.
For the average renter, saving for a deposit would become a distant dream. With rents rising faster than wages, many would be trapped in a vicious cycle of renting with no escape. Homeownership would become a luxury only a select few could afford.
The collapse of the PRS would widen the gap between renters and homeowners like never before, creating a stark housing divide that would leave millions with no hope of ever owning their own home.
It’s not just tenants who would be devastated. The entire UK economy would feel the shockwave. Billions of pounds would be wiped off the table as industries tied to the PRS go into freefall:
This isn’t just a housing crisis—it’s a full-blown economic disaster. The collapse of the PRS would send a shockwave through every sector that touches the rental market, triggering mass unemployment and a recession we can’t afford.
Faced with the collapse of the PRS, the government would have no choice but to intervene—and fast. But would it be enough?
Emergency measures would be rushed through Parliament. We’d see rent caps, tax incentives for landlords, and an all-out scramble to expand social housing programmes. But here’s the truth: by the time the government reacts, it may be too little, too late.
The damage to the PRS—and the economy—could be irreversible.
In the wake of the PRS collapse, a new player would rise to dominate the rental market: corporate Build-to-Rent giants. These institutional investors would swoop in, buying up properties en masse and filling the gap left by private landlords.
But make no mistake—this isn’t good news for tenants. With corporate landlords calling the shots, rental prices could become even more sky-high, and tenants might find themselves locked into strict, impersonal contracts with faceless landlords. The days of renting from a local, personal landlord would be gone, replaced by corporate control.
Beyond the economic and housing chaos, there’s another casualty to consider: our communities. The collapse of the PRS would see long-standing communities torn apart as tenants are displaced, neighbourhoods hollowed out, and properties left vacant.
Without local landlords to care for properties and invest in communities, many areas would face urban decay, further deepening the social divide and leaving towns and cities across the UK scarred.
This nightmare scenario isn’t inevitable—but it could happen if the government doesn’t take action to address the challenges landlords face. Reforming tax policy, providing clearer incorporation options, and easing the regulatory burden on landlords could stop the PRS from crumbling entirely.
But we can’t wait for the government to step in. Now’s the time to act.
At Property118, we’re working tirelessly to stop the collapse of the Private Rented Sector. We’ve been on the front lines, advocating for landlords’ rights, pushing for fairer tax treatment, and raising awareness about the housing crisis.
But we can’t do it alone. Running campaigns, lobbying for change, and keeping landlords informed all take time, money, and resources. That’s where you come in.
If you’ve found value in what we do—if you want to prevent the collapse of the PRS and keep the UK’s rental market alive—we need your support.
Let’s not wait for the worst to happen. Together, we can save the Private Rented Sector before it’s too late.
Previous Article
National Insurance and Dividend Tax Inequality
Judith Wordsworth
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up9:07 AM, 27th October 2024, About 2 months ago
Some may remember my post on here, when the last Government started the Renters Reform Bill process, which suggested every PRS landlord gave their tenants a s21 Notice on the same day with the same expiry date 3 months hence.
I seriously believe, and still do, that that would have likely resulted in the only recourse open to the powers that be ie the Government, the Local Authorities and other 3rd parties to have to work with, and not against, PRS landlords and to avoid the possibility, no matter how remote, of hundreds if not thousands of UK tent cities.
One of my local Counsellors has admitted that my local Council, last May, was already buying in tents!
It is not too late to do this, but sadly even though no legal requirement to follow through with applications for Possession Orders, I doubt if PRS landlords will. An opportunity missed.
Mr Blueberry
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up4:27 AM, 28th October 2024, About 2 months ago
Landlords are continually on the back foot.
However, as you suggest, landlords do have power in numbers. There are two million eight hundred thousand private rental landlords in England. This is a very signicant number that could sway the next general election.
My suggestion, for what it's worth, is to use a platform such as Property 118 to create a union called LANDLORD VOTE. Landlord Vote would create a Mini Manifesto. Like a trade union it would help finance a political party most aligned to the LANDLORD VOTE manifesto.
In the last election I believe Labour won with 9.7M votes, Conservatives 6.8M, Liberal Democrats 3.5M.
Reform Party got 14% of the vote in the last election but only a few seats.
As I understand Reform Party would abolish the Renters Rights Bill and create a more sensible and practical solution to the housing crisis.
A 2M block vote to Reform Party would give a significant leg up for Reform and in return LANDLORD VOTE union could negotiate with them a fairer policy that helps both landlords and tenants without the existing proposed draconian regulation that will only lead to less rentable homes and higher rents.
Chris Mills
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up7:23 AM, 28th October 2024, About 2 months ago
SOLD!!
My lovely 4 bed semi, my best performer, sold yesterday in principle to a first-time buying couple currently living with parents. Another rental gone, that's 2 this year and more to come as my tenants leave, if they ever will!
But no, say Labour, it isn't happening!
Umm, yes it is....
TJP
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up9:41 AM, 28th October 2024, About 2 months ago
Great article. But you missed out two other nightmares. 1. The court system. Already at the forefront of demonising landlords, they will be instructed by government to prevent evictions at all costs. I heard from a barrister that this is already happening. 2 Tenants will become aquatters. Once the crises deepens, tenants will, en masses, refuse to go, legally or otherwise. Anarchy will prevail.
Stella
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up10:27 AM, 28th October 2024, About 2 months ago
Reply to the comment left by TJP at 28/10/2024 - 09:41
Of course the Judges will not even have to pretent to be even handed if the hardship clause which Pennycook is proposing is in the RRB.
This would be a pandora's box full of extra problems.
Freda Blogs
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up13:07 PM, 28th October 2024, About 2 months ago
Reply to the comment left by TJP at 28/10/2024 - 09:41
It is a very worrying prospect if Judges are indeed complicit in denying a legal remedy to a LL.
They are there to uphold the law, not to deny or misinterpret it in order to obtain a preferred outcome, whether that is political, social or for any other reason.
TJP
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up13:30 PM, 28th October 2024, About 2 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Freda Blogs at 28/10/2024 - 13:07True story. Willesden County Court, September 2022. My tenant had refused to leave under section 21. After 10 months we finally had our day in court. His free legal aid for the day asked me for a copy of the tenancy agreement, which clearly stated there was no deposit. My tenant had signed this document. The judge asked me if I had protected the deposit. I said, no, there was no deposit. My tenant and I had signed the agreement stating this. The judge, without asking how much the deposit was, then asked my tenant if he had paid a deposit. My tenant lied and said yes. The judge completely ignoring the document we had both signed that there was no deposit, then proceeded to dismiss my case. I had not protected the non-existing deposit. It took a further 2 years, under Section 8, to get my property back.
Can you imagine what will happen when rents go through the roof and judges have been instructed to stop evictions using whatever nasty tricks they feel like employing. My barrister told me this is happening right now and I believe him.
GlanACC
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up8:37 AM, 31st October 2024, About 2 months ago
Reply to the comment left by TJP at 28/10/2024 - 13:30
That is why it is worth employing someone like Landlord Action to ensure the process is followed. When I had to go to court they sent along a solicitor who sat beside me.
The judge would not have been able to get away with this action as the solicitor would have intervened.