0:02 AM, 2nd November 2023, About A year ago 102
Text Size
Not sure what’s in the Renters’ Reform Bill? We’ve rounded up everything you need to know about the long-awaited bill below and will continue to keep updating the guide as we get more clarification.
The government claim the reforms will help 11 million tenants across England benefit from “safer, fairer and higher quality homes thanks to a once-in-a-generation overhaul of housing laws.”
The new bill also claims it will ‘protect’ more than two million landlords by making it easier for them to recover properties when they need to – so they can sell their property if they want to, move in with a close family member, or when tenants willfully do not pay rent.
The Bill has now been published and can be viewed here
The government has confirmed that it will delay abolishing Section 21 until it improves the court system for handling legitimate possession cases by landlords.
The announcement by the government gave no indication of how long the delay would be.
Student landlords will be pleased to hear that there will be a new ground to repossess properties annually to protect the student housing market.
The government said in a Levelling Up Committee’s report on reforms to the PRS: “We recognize that the student market is cyclical – and that removing section 21 will mean landlords cannot guarantee possession each year for a new set of tenants.
“Having engaged across the sector, we understand the cyclical model is critical for landlords’ business models and ensures a timely and robust supply of student accommodation.
“We will therefore introduce a ground for possession that will facilitate the yearly cycle of short-term student tenancies. This will enable new students to sign up to a property in advance, safe in the knowledge they will have somewhere to live the next year.”
Under the proposed Renters’ Reform Bill, fixed-term tenancies would be banned, and periodic tenancies would be introduced across the private rental sector.
The government said in a Levelling Up Committee’s report on reforms to the PRS: “We believe retaining fixed terms would unfairly lock students into contracts, meaning they could not leave if a property is poor quality, or their circumstances change. Student tenants should have the same flexibility as others.”
The government has instead proposed introducing a new ground for possession for student tenancies so that landlords can serve notice to coincide with the academic year.
Since the bill has been published the government have offered some more clarification regarding pets.
The Renters Reform Bill says landlords will be required to fully consider all requests for a pet on a case-by-case basis.
A landlord must give or refuse consent in writing on or before the 42nd day after the date of the request, although there are some exceptions detailed in the Bill.
The government have provided some updated guidance on landlords refusing a pet in a rented property.
The Department of Levelling Up, Housing and Communities response to the Select Committee report gave examples of the factors which they anticipated landlords would take into account when making their decision.
The government said: “We anticipate that landlords will take into account a number of factors when making their decision. This might include the size of the pet and the property; whether the property or common areas are shared with other tenants; allergies or phobias and, if relevant, access to outdoor space.
“A landlord could likely refuse if, for example, the animal was clearly too large for a small property, or if another tenant in a shared house had an allergy or phobia.”
Landlords will be able to require pet insurance to cover any damage to their property.
Tenants also pay a tenancy deposit which can be used for damages although landlords should not attempt to recover costs twice for the same damage.
If a pet damages a property and the insurance and deposit do not cover the cost of the damage, the bill says a landlord could take the tenant to court to recoup additional funds in line with wider rules in the sector.
Landlords will be able to end a tenancy in specific circumstances defined in law. The grounds for possession are outlined here:
Table 1: Reformed grounds for possession
Ground | Explanation | Notice Period | Mandatory or discretionary |
Moving in | The landlord or their close family member wishes to move into the property. | 2 months | Mandatory |
Selling | The landlord wishes to sell the property | 2 months | Mandatory |
Student accommodation | In the 12 months prior to the start of the tenancy the property has been used to house students. This can be used by educational establishments and PBSA only. | 2 weeks | Mandatory |
Mortgage repossession | The property is subject to a mortgage and the lender exercises a power of sale requiring vacant possession | 2 months | Mandatory |
Superior lease ending | The landlord’s lease is under a superior tenancy that is terminated by the superior landlord. | 2 months | Mandatory |
Selling (rent-to-buy) | The landlord is a private registered provider of social housing and there is a rent-to-buy agreement | 2 months | Mandatory |
The full list covering all circumstances a landlord might reasonably expect possession can be found here
Where a landlord seeks possession using section 8 grounds, the process to end a tenancy will be similar to the current process of using section 21.
Landlords will need to serve the notice on the prescribed form to their tenant with the required notice period. Landlords will need to go to court if a tenant does not leave and provide evidence that the ground applies.
The government have published updated guidance
New grounds for student tenancies
The government announcement on 20 October stated: “landlords must be able to guarantee possession each year for a new set of tenants, and we will introduce a new ground for possession to facilitate this.” No word yet on whether the ground will be mandatory.
New grounds for Revised Mandatory Ground 1: Occupation as principal home for landlord or family
New Mandatory Ground 8A: Repeated Rent Arrears
In the new system, all rent increases will be via one mechanism which replicates the existing section 13 process. This will require a landlord to complete a simple form, which will be published on GOV.UK, and serve it on the tenant with 2 months’ notice.
Once the form is served, the landlord will not have to take further action. If the tenant accepts the proposed rent increase, they simply need to pay the new amount on the next rent day.
A tenant can dispute the increase through referring a case to the First-tier Tribunal, if they think it is above market rate. This must be before the starting date of the proposed new rent and tenants should notify their landlord that they are doing so.
The government have updated the guidance saying landlords will only be able to increase rents once a year. The government have said they will issue guidance in due course to make sure it is clear for everyone.
The Renters Reform Bill will make it illegal for landlords and agents to have blanket bans on renting to tenants in receipt of benefits or with children.
Rachel Maclean, Minister of State for Housing and Planning, said during the second reading of the Renters’ Reform Bill the government are committed to ensuring no family is unjustly discriminated against when looking for a place to live.
She said: “I was asked about blanket bans on benefit claimants and families with children, and I make it very clear that we are committed to outlawing the unacceptable practice of such blanket bans. We are carefully considering how to get these measures right.
“This is a significant reform, as I think all Members understand. We must do it in the right way, while ensuring that landlords rightly have the final say on who they rent their properties to.”
Landlords will get a new digital Property Portal to understand their obligations and help tenants make better decisions when signing a new tenancy agreement.
The proposed bill introduces a digital database called the “Rented Property Portal” in which each landlord and dwelling will be required to have a unique entry.
Landlords must have active entries on this database before they can market a property for rent, and landlords will be responsible for covering the operational costs of the database.
The guidance says a number of new offences will be introduced relating to the PRS database, including knowingly or recklessly providing material false or misleading information.
It will also be added to the list of offences that can enable a tenant to obtain a rent repayment order under Section 40 Housing and Planning Act 2016.
The DLUHC response to the Levelling Up Select Committee said that they expected the penalty system to be “tiered”, with different penalties for different offences.
The government have not provided any more information on how the property portal will operate.
All landlords will be legally required to join the new Ombudsman scheme. At the moment the government is still exploring options for which organisation will take on the role of Ombudsman.
The Ombudsman will be introduced as soon as possible after Royal Assent
The government say: “As a minimum, landlords will be asked for their name, contact information, address, and private rented property details. We are exploring ways for landlord sign-up to align with registration on the Privately Rented Property Portal, so landlords are only required to submit the same information once.”
If a landlord breaches their ombudsman membership requirement, they can be fined up to £5,000 by the local council. If a landlord repeatedly breaches the requirement, they may be fined up to £30,000 and could face criminal prosecution and a Banning Order.
Landlords who use an agent to manage their property will still be required to join the scheme. The Bill says: “Landlords who use managing agents are still responsible for their own behaviour and still retain legal obligations to tenants – particularly around standards and repairs.
“Tenants should be able to seek redress against a landlord when the landlord is at fault, regardless of whether a managing agent is used.”
Only tenants will be able to complain to the Ombudsman. The government says: “While not offering redress for landlords, we are exploring the possibility for the Ombudsman to offer mediation services to landlords to help them resolve their disputes with tenants.”
Letting agents will not be required to join the Ombudsman scheme.
The decent homes standard will be extended to the PRS for the first time.
Introduced in the early 2000s the standard requires all social housing must be free from serious health and safety hazards.
The government says introducing the decent homes standard to the PRS will give renters higher quality homes.
“We will give renters safer, higher quality homes and remove the blight of poor-quality homes in local communities. This will help deliver the government’s Levelling Up mission to halve the number of non-decent rented homes by 2030.”
The government have not confirmed when the decent homes standard will be introduced in the PRS.
The Renters’ Reform Bill will also strengthen councils’ enforcement powers by introducing a new requirement for councils to report on enforcement activity – to help target criminal landlords.
The government have not provided a timescale for when these enforcement powers will happen.
Previous Article
Number of UK's unincorporated landlords rises to 2.82 millionNext Article
Michael Gove, Section 24 and Mars bars?
Luke P
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up15:20 PM, 18th May 2023, About 2 years ago
Reply to the comment left by Judith Wordsworth at 18/05/2023 - 15:08
But if they don't have security of tenure for six months or longer (which they won't have if there are no fixed term tenancies and only monthly periodics) the hierarchy of liability *could* fall to the LL...!
Judith Wordsworth
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up15:27 PM, 18th May 2023, About 2 years ago
Reply to the comment left by Luke P at 18/05/2023 - 15:20
S**t !
I know for single occupancy discount many Councils remove the discount if you have a guest staying for more than 4 weeks!
LaLo
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up16:29 PM, 18th May 2023, About 2 years ago
Next life’ I’m coming back as a tenant - it’s a lot less hassle!
Gromit
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up16:49 PM, 18th May 2023, About 2 years ago
Reply to the comment left by Judith Wordsworth at 18/05/2023 - 15:08
I pointed out via my MP the issues around student lets. They are well aware of these and in fact deliberately exclude PBSAs who can continue with fixed term contracts. The reason for favouring PBSAs was that they had a different business model. When I asked for anexplanation of what way PBSAs business model was different I I got stonewalled.
I beleive theres a good case to take the Government to Court for this.
yl2006
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up12:49 PM, 19th May 2023, About 2 years ago
Reply to the comment left by Helen Morley at 18/05/2023 - 08:50
One of the mandatory grounds for posession is 'serious rent arrears' defined on the Gov.uk website as:
The tenant is at least 2 months in arrears at the time notice is served and the court hearing. Exemption for outstanding benefit payments.
Reluctant Landlord
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up12:54 PM, 19th May 2023, About 2 years ago
Reply to the comment left by Alan Bailey at 18/05/2023 - 08:57
an insurance company is hardly liable to be able to cover you for a pet that you don't own nor have any control over therefore a risk beyond remit.
Even if they could you couldn't charge the tenant (fall foul of the TFA) so the only way would be to increase the rent. That would probably be extortionate. And don't forget if you already raised the rent in the pervious 12 months you cant do that either...
Tenant pet liability insurance wont be worth the paper its written on. The LL cant make a claim against it anyway as it wont have been taken out by them. The tenancy would have to have come to an end before damages at the end of the tenancy could be determined. My guess is that any insurance would expire once the tenant has left the property anyway. The only thing you can do in cases of any damage over the deposit, is as now, take the tenant to court after....
So essentially ZERO cover for the LL hence reasonable to refuse a pet in the first place. If a pet was brought in after the tenant started without consent then eviction with these grounds listed as breach of tenancy and/damage to property.
Reluctant Landlord
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up13:01 PM, 19th May 2023, About 2 years ago
Reply to the comment left by yl2006 at 19/05/2023 - 12:49
ha! A contract requires a months rent in advance and rent payable on this basis going forward at X date each month in accordance with the terms of this agreement..
As the tenant would not be able to provide evidence in order to meet these financial requirements and therefore contractual obligations a tenancy cannot be offered.
Be interesting to see how many LL's continue to take on benefit tenants when UC itself pays only in arrears....
Now they leave themselves open to getting more tied up not getting benefit tenants evicted!
Reluctant Landlord
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up13:10 PM, 19th May 2023, About 2 years ago
following on from my previous post...
It could mean that LL's could ask the council to stump up more money if they wanted to house benefit tenants...
Often not a LL get the first months rent and deposit paid by the LA on behalf of the tenant. The issue is the LL will not get paid directly by UC (never let the tenant be paid!) until at least a month in arrears (at a minimum - it will depend on date of TA and when the UC payment date is) so the rent will never be paid according to the TA in advance of when it is due.
What the LL could do is insist that a further months rent is paid direct to the TENANT, so that the tenant themselves can pay the actual month in advance at the same time the first UC payment is due. That way the rent would be paid a month in advance at all times.
That would get round this 'benefit exemption' clause that YL2006 picked up??
Reluctant Landlord
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up13:14 PM, 19th May 2023, About 2 years ago
Reply to the comment left by Judith Wordsworth at 18/05/2023 - 15:27
talking of council tax the implications are also that at the point a tenant leaves the property at any point the LL becomes liable immediately for CT as a result of no min contract period ending....
Luke P
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up13:33 PM, 19th May 2023, About 2 years ago
Reply to the comment left by DSR at 19/05/2023 - 13:14
That's what I was getting at. Complete shambles. I expect the worst, but think there'll be some watering down before accession, otherwise it won't just be lack of properties, but lack of money in the UK from all those leaving or investing elsewhere.