9:58 AM, 13th September 2023, About A year ago 25
Text Size
Up and down the country landlords are caught in the trap of having to pay for a selective licence.
These licenses aren’t cheap and for the money landlords spend, councils don’t appear to be inspecting properties.
In a series of special reports, Property118 looks at the issues surrounding selective licences starting with the expansion of schemes and the guidance from the government.
The Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities (DLHUC) recently issued guidance around selective licensing. The guidance says: “Only where there is no practical and beneficial alternative to a designation should a selective licensing scheme be made.”
The guidance recommends implementing other methods to combat issues such as anti-social behaviour instead of selective licensing.
The guidance suggests to local authorities that areas suffering from poor housing conditions could have a programme of renewal to improve rented properties.
In areas with anti-social behaviour, the government proposes an education programme that could take place or a voluntary accreditation scheme for landlords.
The guidance says these methods could help to achieve the same objective as a selective licensing scheme.
When approached by Property118 for comment the Department of Levelling Up confirmed that selective licensing should not be used as a standalone tool.
A spokesperson said: “Selective licensing enables a local authority to address specific problems arising in particular areas. It is not a stand-alone tool and should only be used in conjunction with existing initiatives.”
It’s clear that selective licensing should only be a last resort, so why are councils implementing these schemes and shouldn’t they have at least tried the methods suggested by the government?
Across the country, selective licensing schemes are being approved and expanded. Manchester has recently approved another licensing scheme which will require 700 more private rented sector homes to have a licence.
Fees for the licence cost around £800 and the council says it does not generate surplus funds from selective licensing schemes.
On their website, the council says income generated from licensing fees is used to pay for the consultation process, administration, management and running of the scheme.
While this may be true, the amount of money landlords pay, you would expect councils to at the very least inspect properties.
In Nottingham, the first scheme of selective licensing ended on the 31st July 2023 and a new second licensing scheme has just been approved which will come into effect in December.
Mick Roberts, one of Nottingham’s largest landlords helping benefit tenants told Property118 he has had zero inspections inside his properties.
He says: “I have had zero inspections. Around four years eight months into the five-year scheme, they externally inspected a fence.”
Mr Roberts says it was only at the end of the five-year scheme that the council asked to inspect his properties.
He adds: “One month before the end of the scheme, they asked to inspect two of my properties. I’m sure this was just to get inspection numbers up.”
The current cost for a licence in Nottingham is £520 for the first payment (Part A) and the second payment (Part B) is £370. That’s £890 per house. Have more than one rental property and landlords are looking at a hefty outlay.
Some landlords are having to spend thousands of pounds and might never have their properties inspected in the five years that licenses run – so how do councils justify this?
When approached for comment, Liverpool City Council told Property118 that under its Selective Licensing scheme, which started in April 2022, 3,673 property inspections have been conducted.
This is made up of programmed inspections, reactive inspections, anti-social behaviour complaints and revisits.
A spokesperson from Liverpool City Council said: “Findings indicate 63% of properties that have received a programmed inspection have not been compliant with the licence conditions on the inspection and officers have found during inspection, 2,673 breaches of licence conditions and housing faults when visiting the properties.”
The spokesperson added: “The private sector team is working with landlords to ensure that they are abiding by the licence conditions and ensuring that the properties that are rented out are compliant with the conditions and safe for the occupiers to live in.”
Chris Norris, the policy director at the National Association of Residential Landlords, said it’s puzzling why some councils feel the need to establish selective licensing schemes.
He said: “With the government already committed to introducing a Property Portal which will allow local authorities to look up landlords’ details, it’s unclear why some local authorities feel the need to establish selective licensing schemes which act as a tax on good landlords.
“Past NRLA research shows clearly how there is little to no correlation between increased licensing and more effective enforcement of rules.”
He added: “Aside from the risk that regulatory work is duplicated by central and local government, these schemes feel like an unnecessary expense at a time when budgets are constrained.”
When approached for comment Birmingham City Council told us that in line with government guidance, they use other various tools to tackle issues in the area.
A council spokesperson told Property118: “Our specialist Private Tenancy Team provides specialist advice on renting in the private rented sector: they intervene to prevent unlawful eviction and harassment and can pursue criminal prosecutions.
“There is a city-wide HMO Article 4 direction – Any residential house required planning permission to be turned into an HMO, and this approach prevents harmful concentrations of HMOs arising which negatively impact the character, balance, and amenity of local communities.”
The council added: “Under the Housing Act 2004, we can serve formal notices that require improvements to be carried out and if this is not done, the council can carry out works in default.”
Birmingham council is also planning to bring around 10,000 empty properties back into use which they say will help to alleviate the city’s housing crisis.
Liverpool City Council told Property118 that selective licensing is a valuable resource.
A spokesperson said: “Evaluations of Liverpool’s first scheme, introduced to address poor housing and property conditions provided good evidence that selective licencing is a valuable resource for the council’s toolkit.
“During this period, over 34,000 compliance activities were undertaken with 65% of properties non-compliant. 3,375 cases of the most serious hazards (Category 1 and 2) were identified. 2,500 legal notices were issued, 169 formal cautions and 197 written warnings.
“With more than 300 successful landlord offence prosecutions and 87 civil penalties together with a resolution rate of 98% for all reported ASB complaints it is clear how this scheme helped improve housing for our most vulnerable residents in the private rental sector.”
The council says the launch of the second selective licensing scheme will help to target areas with poor housing.
A spokesperson said: “The launch of the second scheme in April 2022 saw a smooth start with systems up and running quickly and officers using learning from the first scheme to ensure teams were operational and mobilised speedily.
“This scheme targets poor housing and the worst property conditions including fire and electrical safety hazards and excess cold and damp.”
The Local Government Association (LGA) told Property118 that they support councils’ selective licensing powers.
A spokesperson said: “The power for councils to introduce selective licensing schemes has been around since 2004 and there are a number of examples across the country. The LGA is supportive of these powers.”
However, the LGA disagrees with the government being able to approve schemes.
It says: “Our main policy ask on selective licensing is that the requirement for Secretary of State approval for larger selective licensing schemes is removed.”
It seems that councils up and down the country are expanding their schemes, but at what cost?
In an already troubling time for landlords, this ‘unnecessary expense’ may do more harm than good for the sector.
Join us in the next series of Property118 selective licencing reports where we discover why council inspectors don’t need permission from the landlord or the tenant to inspect a rented property.
When approached by Property118 Nottingham Council declined to comment.
Previous Article
Government policies force landlords to shrink portfoliosNext Article
Agency Fees Tax Q&A
Mick Roberts
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up6:42 AM, 14th September 2023, About A year ago
Reply to the comment left by Teessider at 13/09/2023 - 11:22
They don't.
In Nottingham, they've been using the words
Intended Entry.
Codswallop.
They can't come in if no crime has been committed and the tenant don't want em in.
My tenants have told em so.
Mick Roberts
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up6:44 AM, 14th September 2023, About A year ago
Reply to the comment left by Old Mrs Landlord at 13/09/2023 - 16:15
Exactly Old Mrs. We aren't the Police. No evidence to show Licensing has decreased ASB
Mick Roberts
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up6:46 AM, 14th September 2023, About A year ago
Reply to the comment left by Paul Essex at 13/09/2023 - 17:28
All my tenants know Selective Licensing has increased rents massively and made it impossible for them to move any more.
I could move several of mine every year if they wanted a swap.
Can't do it any more as no one else is moving to free a house up. And if they do move, I have to charge them the new higher rents as we don't know what attack is coming next. And they HAVE TO go with Letting Agent as I can't keep up with all of Selective Licensing Imbecile conditions.
Mick Roberts
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up6:47 AM, 14th September 2023, About A year ago
Wow
£520 for the first part cost in Nottingham. They ain't getting all mine done on time then. A credit card can't do the impossible and exceed the monthly limit it has been given.
We have zero of them problems ASB etc. on many places Licensing has been introduced. We've proved this using the Council's own figures. They still press ahead. Although this time, they have took several roads out.
Liverpool finding 63% at fault. If a 100 year old house didn't have a fault, we'd be living in Dream land.
The LGA knows nothing. Still after £20 million+ for Nottingham's scheme, NO ONE from the Council or Govt has come to my tenants to ask them WHAT THEY WANT.
Nottingham rental market is screwed for tenants. I got the National Audit office to investigate Nottingham's finances and he said I've spoke to Licensing Mick and they said Nottingham's rental market is very buoyant. I said YES for landlords, we in massive demand and can charge what we like. What about for tenants? Isn't Selective Licensing supposed to be helping tenants? It's wrecked their lives. No one can move any more unless u both earning mega salary.
Crouchender
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up21:46 PM, 19th September 2023, About A year ago
Reply to the comment left by Mick Roberts at 14/09/2023 - 06:47
I see that the government official have taken over at Birmingham Council now they are bankrupt.
With only 15% LL uptake of the huge Birmingham SL scheme I bet the housing enforcement/licencing team are p**ing their pants now as their resources were based on 100% uptake of SL from LLs.
These blanket SL scheme don't work as LLs feel they are unjustified for their area as the council just fiddled their number to get a massive 'money grab'; SL scheme
Reluctant Landlord
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up9:19 AM, 20th September 2023, About A year ago
"Selective licensing schemes are an unnecessary expense and should only be used as a last resort –....
when your council is broke because of total financial mismanegement....
Mick Roberts
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up7:24 AM, 21st September 2023, About A year ago
Reply to the comment left by Crouchender at 19/09/2023 - 21:46
As in Nottingham, the Landlords that don't want to come forward or pay just don't & they take the risk.
NCC are Shambolic
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up9:58 AM, 19th October 2023, About A year ago
Nottingham City Council came and "inspected" my property on the 19 July 2023 - 59 months and 3 weeks after issuing the Selective License on August 1 2018 - they told me (from 2 difference people there at different times when I challenged them about sitting on their hands and the money) "we were overwhelmed by the number of applications" and the second excuse "it was because of COVID". Both total poppycock.
My final email to them yesterday went like this:
"NCC: Improving the quality of housing in the City is one of the Council’s main priorities:
Reply 1: Let's take the recent news of a lady called Jade Sharp and her partner who are NCH tenants - she waited 4 years for NCH to bother to deal with dangerous levels of mould and it only acted when faced with court action from the tenant's solicitors . .
Reply 2: Then there's Laura Harding and her NCH property in St Anns - again despite cries for help with many calls to NCC to deal with the mould issues - the mum spoke to the local media saying she "fears for daughter's health amid 6 month wait"
. . .There are plenty of instances of NCC/NCH's failure of care of its own occupied properties.
NCC: We have laws in place:
Reply: Behind which NCC will hide and use – this daft scheme doesn’t smoke out unscrupulous landlords, it’s just a stealth tax on the rest of us.
NCC: A period of time where we were unable to undertake inspections (COVID).
Reply: Nonsense – the lockdown was a limited period, 25 March 2020 – 31 May 2020, we’re talking here of August 2018 until March 2020 = 19 months, then no action and until (in my case) 19th July 2023 = 3 years+ more than of 4 years of inaction . . .
NCC: The Council is not permitted to obtain financial gain.
Reply: What? We asked at the Talbot Street meeting how many staff were on the project – then it was 82. A few of us (landlords at the meeting) ran a few numbers based on average wages and came up with that roughly 90% of all the income went to pay salaries – these employees having been moved from NCC’s payroll to that of NCC's Selective Licensing’s payroll – NCC are profiting vastly via a payroll switch.
NCC: "NCC Finances"
Reply: David Mellen (NCC Leader) recently stated, "it would be foolish to rule out bankruptcy being declared by the authority". Looking back to NCC's misappropriation of £15.86 million from its ring-fenced Housing Revenue Account, which is used for council homes and tenants, and used it instead for its General Fund for other council services.
Look – I’m obviously miffed at being legally scammed by a City Council and come hell or high water, the City Council will defend its position. It has to.
I have succumbed to the bullying and told the estate agents to renew this daft licence.
Nothing personal – it’s potty.
All the best
Eddie"
My earlier point to NCC was I am selling the place in July 2024 - yet they want 60 months for something I can prove delivers me zilch. I offered to pay a 12 month portion but they said it's 60 months or else . .
Crouchender
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up10:26 AM, 19th October 2023, About A year ago
Reply to the comment left by NCC are Shambolic at 19/10/2023 - 09:58
On your inspection did they give it all green ticks on their clipboard or did you have to make 'some improvements'- however small but normally costly to the LL?
They will then use this data as evidence of:
x% of hazard notices issued, y% of improvement notices issued (no matter how small/ minor it is.
Data manipulation is rife in SL council scheme. NO wonder there is poor uptake on SL by LLs in Bankrupt Birmingham.
Grumpy Doug
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up17:51 PM, 19th October 2023, About A year ago
Reply to the comment left by Crouchender at 19/10/2023 - 10:26
My inspector actually admitted that my HMOs were nicer than his own house!
He still managed to find a few things for me to do - as you say, he can now point to those "improvement" notices as a justification for his existence. Went through it all at considerable expense in 2018, looking forward (NOT!) to it all again next year.