9:06 AM, 19th July 2024, About 4 months ago 22
Text Size
So, where do we begin? The Renters (Reform) Bill is dead, long live the Renters’ Rights Bill! But is it better or worse than what the Tories had planned for the private rented sector? Well, I think the prospect of bringing in rent controls should alarm landlords everywhere.
I’ll come onto the other issues later, but the prospect of tenants objecting to rent rises will lead to a huge issue.
Of course, lots of them will object – they don’t care if their landlord can afford their buy to let mortgage, selective licensing fee and the other onerous running costs.
But Labour will be knocked sideways by this idea because there’s something coming down the train tracks, they haven’t factored in which could decimate the PRS as we know it – and there’s nothing they can do about it.
The idea that tenants can object to rent rises will play well to the activist groups because all PRS landlords are just mean. Right?
Wrong. Most of us just want to invest in a property that we can sell at some point, inevitably to fund a pension pot, so we need tenants. Good tenants, that is.
How many landlords will decide that an objection will be upheld since the courts are apparently so anti-landlord?
And if we don’t raise the rent to at least cover our costs or make a small profit, we have one of two options: not put the rent up or sell.
Which would you do? I’m guessing it’s going to be easier to sell, rather than put up with more nonsense from the naïve socialists.
I’ve mentioned before that we should also expect to see restrictions on selling – and a big increase in CGT, obviously.
This lack of understanding consequences of actions is going to be a serious issue over the coming years as landlords struggle to make sense of the new law.
It looks like there will be a tribunal of sorts for tenants to object to which will then reject or limit the rent increase. It would be nice if they would accept it, but I’m not holding out much hope.
That’s because we already have a court system that is weighed heavily against landlords and here’s a legal hurdle that will, in all likelihood, side with tenants.
This means the Renters’ Rights Bill will effectively bring in rent controls without a debate and by the back door.
The Bill is aimed entirely at scapegoating landlords and plays to the crowd. This is one battle that landlords cannot win.
Having seen some of the amendments that were made to the Renters (Reform) Bill by Labour, I’m dreading what else might be delivered.
Essentially, landlords are being held accountable for the failings of various governments.
We didn’t build enough homes to house the millions of people who have turned up here. You did.
Labour says the Bill introduces a fairer rental market, but for whom? It certainly won’t be for landlords, and as time will prove, it won’t be fair for tenants either.
And should de facto rent controls be brought in then we will have a holy mess of a PRS to sort out.
Just look at Scotland and the antics of a Lefty, SNP government that punished landlords with a rent cap – rents rocket and landlords leave.
Reading Property118 and what impact the Bill will have, here’s my response:
Let’s wrap up with my mention earlier about what is coming down the tracks that could blow the PRS apart.
It’s in a story on Property118 about renters getting older and portfolio landlords expanding.
The story ends with this sentence: ‘With 350,000 buy to let mortgages due to mature in the next year, landlords who are refinancing could see mortgage bills increase by £225 per month.’
It seems such a casual fact to bandy about but that’s a lot of landlords who will be looking at increasing the rent by a hefty amount.
And if tenants can object to a rent rise, what will the government, the councils, tenants and landlords do when the rent doesn’t go up?
I imagine there will be a lot of finger pointing and landlord blaming.
But don’t worry renters, the government is building 1.5 million homes in the next five years.
That won’t be quick enough to house you but, wait, Labour has already said most of that number will go to illegals and asylum seekers in temporary accommodation.
So, you won’t be getting houses, and your landlord will sell up – also hurting house prices – and you’ll struggle to find somewhere else to live.
We really do get the politicians we deserve.
Until next time,
The Landlord Crusader
Previous Article
Invented gas and electricity charges?
NewYorkie
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up11:57 AM, 19th July 2024, About 4 months ago
Reply to the comment left by dismayed landlord at 19/07/2024 - 10:16
Clarkson's Hawkestone Cider is excellent.
NewYorkie
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up12:01 PM, 19th July 2024, About 4 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Ron H-W at 19/07/2024 - 10:19
And then there will be all the net zero EPC costs to hermetically seal older properties, many of which simply can't comply.
Simon Lever - Chartered Accountant helping clients get the best returns from their properties
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up12:09 PM, 19th July 2024, About 4 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Ian Narbeth at 19/07/2024 - 11:42"It is perfectly possible that a landlord might receive two offers, one at £1200 a month and one at £1250. He might then ask the bidder at £1200 if he/she is prepared to bid higher than £1250. Alternatively, the landlord might receive two offers at the same price and then invite both to increase their bids."
Now look at it another way:
Landlord goes to prospective tenant 1 and says I would like you to become my tenant but I have been offered a higher rent by prospective tenant 2 so cannot accept your offer. Thank you and goodbye.
Prospective tenant 1 comes back and says - OK I will increase my offer to £1,275.
That is not an auction but just a revised offer. It depends on how the paperwork trail is seen and the point of view of the parties.
There will always be a way around stupid regulations.
Ian Narbeth
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up12:14 PM, 19th July 2024, About 4 months ago
Reply to the comment left by dismayed landlord at 19/07/2024 - 11:45
"Why keep picking on landlords!!"
Because they are Socialists and have no grasp of economics and of the concept of trade-offs. They think you can solve a problem by diktat and don't think through the consequences. When, predictably, bad stuff happens they double down on foolish policies and make matters worse.
dismayed landlord
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up12:16 PM, 19th July 2024, About 4 months ago
Reply to the comment left by NewYorkie at 19/07/2024 - 11:57Thank you for that recommendation. I normally prefer real ale ( not crafted) like Nelson’s Blood. Yes I live in Kent . Perhaps the government of what ever shade of any colour would also factor in the cost to the NHS of landlords with anxiety, stress , mental health and alcohol addiction issues. Add that to the true cost of housing. Who really wins in all this . No one except politicians and Polly - and her friends- who slag us landlords of and house no one. At least as I am dragged away screaming in a straight jacket I can grin to myself that Pollys income tax is paying for my care🤣🤣
NewYorkie
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up12:20 PM, 19th July 2024, About 4 months ago
Reply to the comment left by dismayed landlord at 19/07/2024 - 12:16
Now she's got her pals in No10, let's see how critical she will be of them when they don't deliver... because they won't!
NewYorkie
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up12:26 PM, 19th July 2024, About 4 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Ian Narbeth at 19/07/2024 - 12:14
With ideology built on communism, it's hardly surprising they believe rule by dictat is the way forward. The only problem is, we have a capitalist economy, where investors can choose where to invest, without worrying about a Chinese or North Korean dictator throwing you in jail and confiscating your wealth if you don't do as you're told.
dismayed landlord
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up12:41 PM, 19th July 2024, About 4 months ago
Reply to the comment left by NewYorkie at 19/07/2024 - 12:26
Wish you had not said that - you will be giving the new government ideas! 🤣
The pandemic allowed several pieces of legislation to take priority over landlords and others contracts and rights as it was declared a crisis.
Angie would not be adverse to claiming a crisis and evoking similar restrictions and uk wide changes. It would make her a household name - promotion would be automatic - and good or bad she achieves fame . Who shot Kennedy and Lennon. Fame is fame. Liz is still talked about!
Reluctant Landlord
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up16:27 PM, 19th July 2024, About 4 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Ian Narbeth at 19/07/2024 - 11:42
as long as a LL does not formally write to any T to ' I invite you to bid...XYZ', I can't see how any of this is enforceable anyway??
Like you say all it means is rent will be advertised at a higher amount to start with even if the LL has no intention of charging that much in the first place.
The LL could even market it at 'offers no lower than XYZ'. Everything will be subject to affordability anyway no matter what number a tenant offers...
Cider Drinker
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up22:28 PM, 19th July 2024, About 4 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Ian Narbeth at 19/07/2024 - 10:17
In any transaction there is the Zone Of Possible Agreement (ZOPA).
My point regarding the £250k property is that if Labour introduce rent capping, what should the rent cap be for a property valued at £250k?
Obviously, a rent of £1 would be too low for any landlord to accept. A rent of £250k would be too high for any tenant to accept. The ZOPA lies somewhere between these extremes
If I can earn 5% in £250k in a bank account, I would need more than this (after other costs) to rent out a property.
I saw a property that was sold in February and subsequently let achieve a gross yield of 8.8%. My property in the same street, based on the same selling price was achieving just 5.5%. My property is empty at present. Even if I could earn a gross yield of 8.8%, I’d prefer to sell. The risks introduced by tge Tories and those yet to be introduced by the Labour are just too great for me to accept.