PRS landlords face a future with furry friends

PRS landlords face a future with furry friends

0:02 AM, 23rd June 2023, About A year ago 28

Text Size

It may be good news for our furry friends that under the Renters’ Reform Bill they might be allowed in rented properties, but what does this mean for landlords?

The proposed rules mean that landlords cannot reasonably refuse a request to have a pet in the property.

How will this work and what does it mean for insurance? This Property118 investigation looks at how the new rules will affect landlords and what this means for our furry friends.

What do the new proposals mean for landlords?

The Renters’ Reform Bill says landlords will be required to fully consider all requests on a case-by-case basis.

A landlord must give or refuse consent in writing on or before the 42nd day after the date of the request, although there are some exceptions detailed in the Bill.

Chris Norris, policy director, of the NRLA told Property118 that the government must provide greater clarity to landlords on what grounds they can refuse a pet.

He said: “It still remains unclear as to the exact grounds on which landlords can refuse to let to tenants with a pet, so the government must provide greater clarity on this point.

“Until we receive further clarity from the Government, we advise landlords to show flexibility wherever possible when liaising with tenants on the question of whether to allow pets in private rental properties.”

Propertymark says that the government must take into account the suitability of the property.

A spokesperson told us: “Propertymark will continue to make the case that the ability for landlords to not allow tenants to rent in certain properties must be based on suitability such as taking into account the type of pet and property type.”

If a tenant disagrees with the landlord’s decision or believes that the landlord has ‘unreasonably’ refused, the tenant will be able to choose to escalate their enquiry to the new property ombudsman.

Cats Protection took in 1,300 cats last year

Cats Protection says that last year it took in around 1,300 cats – the equivalent of at least three cats each day – due to landlords not allowing them in their properties, making it the eighth most-cited reason as to why cats are given up to the charity.

Cats Protection’s head of advocacy and government relations, Madison Rogers, said: “For too long, renters have been denied the chance to own a pet cat simply because they rent rather than own their home.

“These new proposals will finally give renters the chance to experience the comfort, joy and companionship that comes with owning a cat, along with the security of knowing they can feel settled in their rented home.”

She added: “We were pleased to join up with our friends at Dogs Trust to highlight to politicians why these new proposals are so important to millions of people.

“We are looking forward to continuing to work with the government to ensure the proposals give more renters the chance to finally own a pet in a way that is fair and affordable for all.”

‘We are a nation of animal lovers’

While building his property portfolio, Mark Alexander, the founder of Property118, would conduct checks on tenants with pets to make sure the property was suitable.

He said: “What I am interested in with dogs is seeing the tenant’s previous house and any tell-tale signs like chewed shoes, chewed doors etc.

“If I get there and the pets are running wild, wrecking the property and snarling at me whilst I’m filling in the application forms, it’s an easy decision to make.”

However, Mr Alexander says some of the best tenants he’s ever had have owned pets.

He explains: “My personal experience is that people with pets move less often, perhaps because it’s so hard for them to find another landlord who accepts pets.

“We are a nation of animal lovers, and many people would go without food to make sure their pets are well cared for.”

Mr Alexander continued: “The best story I have was about a single lady in her 30s and when I went around to do the application I looked around and I said I thought you had two dogs.

“She said yes and introduced me to her Rhodesian Ridgeback dogs. These two dogs were so well-behaved, let me stroke them and laid at my feet.”

He added: “She was one of the best tenants I’ve ever had.”

Landlords will hike rents to deal with pets

People with pets may now find it even harder to find somewhere to rent as landlords plan to hike rents to deal with pets.

The survey by Mortgages for Business found only a small percentage of landlords currently market their properties as ‘pet-friendly’.

The same survey also found 75% of landlords will raise rents to deal with pets.

Jeni Browne, a director of Mortgages for Business, said: “Government statistics suggest only 7% of landlords currently market their properties as ‘pet-friendly’. This is not an accident.

“It’s expensive to be a landlord to tenants with pets: they can damage properties and can lower the market value of a property.”

57% of 537 surveyed landlords and agents were unable to recoup the costs of pet damage

What will now happen to insurance especially when a pet could damage a property?

Under the Tenant Fees Act 2019, a landlord cannot require a tenant to enter a contract with a third party to provide a service or insurance related to the property.

As part of the Renters’ Reform Bill, the government will amend the Tenant Fees Act 2019 to include pet insurance as a permitted payment. This means that landlords can require pet insurance to cover any damage to their property.

Under the reforms, agents and landlords who consent to the tenant keeping a pet must inform the tenant in writing that either:

  • The tenant maintains insurance to cover the risk of pet damage to a reasonable level
  • The tenant must pay the landlord’s reasonable costs of maintaining insurance that covers the risk of pet damage.

The government says: “In the very rare cases where the insurance and deposit do not cover the cost of the damage, a landlord could take the tenant to court to recoup additional funds in line with wider rules in the sector.”

Propertymark told Property118 that the UK government must make sure that there are suitable providers that offer pet insurance.

Timothy Douglas, head of policy and campaigns, at Propertymark says: “As was highlighted by Propertymark and others, one of the unintended consequences of the Tenant Fees Act and the cap on deposits is that landlords have become more risk-averse to allow a tenant to rent with a pet.

“This is not surprising when our research in July 2022 uncovered that 57% of 537 surveyed landlords and agents were unable to recoup the costs of pet damage.”

He added: “The UK Government must also ensure that there are adequate providers to offer pet insurance and where the tenant takes out the insurance cover, the provider must be able to underwrite non-payment if the policy is cancelled by the tenant before the tenancy ends.”

The Association of British Insurers told Property118 that landlord and home insurance policies don’t protect you against accidental damage but sometimes can be included as an add-on.

A spokesperson said: “Most standard landlord and home insurance policies won’t protect you against accidental damage caused by pets, but it can be included as an add-on.

“We would always recommend shopping around to find the best policy that meets your needs, not just based on price. If you’re not sure what your policy includes, speak to your insurer who should be able to help.”

Even harder to find a place to live

Whilst the Renters’ Reform Bill claims to make it easier for tenants to rent with pets, many will find it even more expensive.

And while there are positive stories of landlords letting to pet-owning tenants, rising costs and uncertainty in the PRS means our furry friends may find it even harder to find a place to live than they do now.


Share This Article


Comments

Seething Landlord

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

10:47 AM, 24th June 2023, About A year ago

Reply to the comment left by Dennis Forrest at 24/06/2023 - 10:36
I have no idea. My question was directed to those who seem to think that they will simply be able to give notice.

Luke Dreyer

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

10:55 AM, 24th June 2023, About A year ago

I used to rent out my 3 bed mid terrace. I always said that my tenants were welcome to keep pets if they wanted to, subject to them agreeing to and signing an addendum form with additional clauses for their AST.
They had to purchase and keep up to date with tenancy pet insurance, I must have a copy of their certificate and a copy of their terms to ensure my property was fully covered against any damage their pets may cause.
They had to fix any caused damage straight away and notify me that it has happened.
They had to ensure any pet they kept was kept within a legally suitable enclosure attending to the health, wellbeing and welfare of the animal.

If they didn't do all of these things, then they were in breach of their AST and a review would be conducted. It was discussed that if a review was conducted, that could mean a rent increase if they wished to stay at the property etc. All legally binding.

RGJ25

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

16:53 PM, 24th June 2023, About A year ago

Councils and housing associations allow pets because you get a shell when you move in.
The previous tenants flooring is stripped out, any cooker or fridges are scrapped and the walls are reset to magnolia.
Private tenants often want more flexibility and a home that is ready to use.
Who is going to carpet an entire house and arrange appliances if they only want to stay a year?
This bill is counterproductive.

JamesB

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

10:38 AM, 25th June 2023, About A year ago

Reply to the comment left by Luke Dreyer at 24/06/2023 - 10:55
Except it couldn't mean a rent increase if they had already had one in the last year?

peter edwards

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

15:40 PM, 25th June 2023, About A year ago

Reply to the comment left by Stella at 24/06/2023 - 06:49
And what will happen to the feral drug dealing families with pit bulls who have moved into private rented in my street ? These people are obviously above the law, as nobody does anything about them.

AnthonyJames

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

1:20 AM, 26th June 2023, About A year ago

And what about HMOs? A tenant of mine "rescued" a kitten without my permission and this lead to massive disputes within the houseshare. Another tenant complained the cat worsened her asthma and gave her a rash. The kitten wasn't housetrained and scratched my sofas to ribbons and peed and s**t everywhere..Three of the tenants said either the cat leaves or we do. What is a landlord meant to do in future when an HMO tenant pulls the "I want a pet" card?

This is not a short-term problem either. Once cat lint gets into the carpets, prospective tenants with allergies can detect it for years afterwards, no matter how much you spend on "professional cleaning".

GlanACC

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

7:30 AM, 26th June 2023, About A year ago

I would rather have pets in my properties than smokers who caot the rooms with hard to paint over tar

Smiffy

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

10:59 AM, 26th June 2023, About A year ago

Dog barking and winding up the neighbours
and
Cat brought into a HMO affecting the other tenants

Both must be classed as anti-social behaviour. Sounds like grounds to me.

Dennis Forrest

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

11:56 AM, 26th June 2023, About A year ago

Reply to the comment left by GlanACC at 26/06/2023 - 07:30We sold a flat 2 years ago with badly stained walls ceilings and woodwork.. Tenants were father and son, both heavy smokers. We turned a blind eye to their smoking as they always prompt with rent payments, agreed to reasonable rent increases and the property was unfurnished. We replaced all the carpets which were badly worn anyway and painting with either emulsion or gloss paint was no problem as we used the right primer.
ZINSSER COVER STAIN PRIMER WHITE 2.5LTR
Interior and exterior primer, sealer, stain sealer and bond coat.
Touch-Dry in 35 Minutes
Adhesion to any Surface without Sanding
Seals Water & Stains
Blocks Cedar & Redwood Bleed
Tintable to Mid-Tone Colours
Recoat in 2 Hrs

GlanACC

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

12:36 PM, 26th June 2023, About A year ago

Reply to the comment left by Dennis Forrest at 26/06/2023 - 11:56
Thanks Dennis, My handyman now sugar soaps the walls before painting them. I would still rather have pets than smokers. Having said that I now have wired in smoke alarms and that puts them off a bit

Leave Comments

In order to post comments you will need to Sign In or Sign Up for a FREE Membership

or

Don't have an account? Sign Up

Landlord Automated Assistant Read More