Property sector responds to the Renters (Reform) Bill latest

Property sector responds to the Renters (Reform) Bill latest

0:05 AM, 25th October 2023, About A year ago 3

Text Size

The Renters (Reform) Bill’s second reading has been passed without a vote which has prompted various leading figures in the property sector to offer an opinion on what comes next.

One of the big issues is that the government’s planned abolition of section 21 ‘no-fault’ evictions will not happen until the court system has been improved.

Critics – including Labour’s Angela Rayner – fear this means that it could be years before section 21 is abolished.

The potential delay has also led Goodlord’s chief executive William Reeve to say: “This is an unexpected announcement that could mark a potentially huge change for the sector and the trajectory of the bill.

“Under these conditions, it could take years for scrapping Section 21 to actually come into force.”

‘The scrapping of Section 21’

Mr Reeve added: “Interestingly, although still overall very opposed to the change, landlords had recently started to soften slightly in their position to the scrapping of Section 21.

“According to our research, in 2022 71% of landlords believed the abolition of Section 21 would have a negative impact on the sector. In 2023, this had dropped to 62%.”

Laura Southgate, a partner in the property disputes team at legal firm Cripps, said: “Despite the Bill having passed through a second reading in Parliament, renters will understandably be disappointed to hear that the abolition of no-fault evictions will be delayed ‘until reforms to the justice system are in place’.

landlords have questioned whether the courts can keep up

She continued: “But many landlords, who have questioned whether the courts can keep up with the proposed changes, will welcome the news.

“Landlords want certainty that if a tenant fails to comply with their tenancy agreement – for example by not paying rent – they would be able to repossess their property.

“A key factor in that is the reliability and efficiency of the court process for recovering possession.

“Unfortunately, however, the courts are vastly overstretched: possession claims and the following eviction process can take many months, sometimes more.”

Student rental sector should not move to periodic tenancies

When introducing the Bill, Mr Gove acknowledged that the student rental sector should not move to periodic tenancies and said an annual solution would be delivered.

Frankie Malpass, the product Lead at Vouch, said: “One of the key areas that the government has recognised is the impact of periodic tenancies on private student renters.

“Students generally have different renting needs compared to the wider private rental sector – with a greater requirement for cyclical tenancies – so the blanket switch to periodic tenancies doesn’t serve students or their landlords well.

“It’s therefore encouraging to see that this issue has been recognised by the Government by the introduction of a process to complete the tenancy at the end of the academic year, ready for a new cohort of students to move in, enabling students to line up their housing in advance.

“However, more specifics will be needed to ensure the concerns of student and student landlords have been truly addressed.”


Share This Article


Comments

Easy rider

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

9:01 AM, 25th October 2023, About A year ago

Why do we persist with labelling Section 21 Notices as ’no fault evictions’.
They’re not evictions, they’re notices seeking possession. Only a judge can order eviction.
They’re not ‘no fault’ either. They are ‘no reason given’ which is not the same thing. Section 21 Notices are often used because their outcome is certain (if served correctly) and they’re often cheaper and less confrontational.
Section 8 includes grounds that are ‘no fault’ such as possession by the lender, landlord needs to move in, owned by a minister of Religion or property required for close family member of the landlord. They plan to add ‘landlord wishes to sell’ to Section 8 - another ‘no fault’ reason.
If fewer tenants are evicted following the RRB then there will be fewer homes available to new tenants. The Bill does nothing to address the real problem but then, it wouldn’t be the U.K. government if they thought policies through.

Reluctant Landlord

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

10:35 AM, 25th October 2023, About A year ago

I read the transcript from the Renters (Reform) Bill Volume 738: debated on Monday 23 October 2023.

One MP made a significant observation which I had not picked up on. Craig Whittaker (Calder Valley) (Con) explains....

"Let me give a couple of examples about using section 8 evictions to replace section 21. Ground eight is currently the most heavily relied on ground for landlords trying to gain repossession, and it currently provides a two-week notice period. It applies where the tenant is two months in rent arrears at the date of the section 8 notice and the date of the possession hearing. In the Bill, the notice period has been extended to four weeks. Also, any outstanding universal credit payments that the tenant is due to receive are not to be included when calculating the arrears, if the universal credit payment would reduce arrears below the two-month threshold. The Government cannot say to landlords on one hand that the contract for UC is between the landlord and the tenant, but in the Bill say that the landlord has to take off the pending UC payments for rent. It is a nonsense."

Thsi is one of many things that need to be addressed in bill. Its now passed the second reading...all MP's can now input to this next stage. I suggest we all go heall for leather on our MP's - whatever colour they represent. The RB is not fit for purpose and I am not convinced that the delay using the court backlog is going to wash long term

Mick Roberts

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

15:01 PM, 25th October 2023, About A year ago

One example.
At the moment, my rent increases are done informally. Quick chat, u know all rents are £900, u only paying £600, Can we agres £650. Job done.
Then my standard letter.
Same with my Letting agent houses.

I believe this RRB insists on Section 13. I'm not filling that in. My Letting Agent charges £50 to send Section 13 out. Who's paying for that? An extra £4 on the monthly rent.

Please wake up Govt.

Leave Comments

In order to post comments you will need to Sign In or Sign Up for a FREE Membership

or

Don't have an account? Sign Up

Landlord Automated Assistant Read More