Pennycook: Why a landlord exodus is DEFINITELY underway

Pennycook: Why a landlord exodus is DEFINITELY underway

9:32 AM, 25th October 2024, About 3 days ago 16

Text Size

It’s almost like something out of the novel 1984, when the evidence of your eyes is not to be trusted. I’m talking, of course, about housing minister Matthew Pennycook at the Renters’ Rights Bill committee hearing.

He went to great lengths to downplay the landlord exodus saying there was no evidence for it.

He does say that despite warnings for years that landlords are leaving, there’s apparently ‘no proof’ of a mass landlord exit.

Mr Pennycook admits that a trend of smaller landlords, particularly those reliant on buy to let mortgages, are selling properties. He attributes this to the tax changes introduced in 2015.

It’s a strange world when we have a growing population with regular reports that rents are rising because demand is higher than supply.

Ergo, we don’t have enough PRS landlords.

Mr Pennycook highlights that the overall size of the PRS has doubled since the early 2000s.

That’s a selective benchmark because it avoids the issue of landlords selling since 2016.

We all know of landlords who have sold up or are thinking of doing so. All of us.

If they aren’t selling, they are moving into holiday lets (out of the frying pan??).

Exit the private rented sector

The decision of landlords to exit the private rented sector (PRS) is influenced by a complex interplay of factors.

Along with the section 24 changes, we’ve had higher interest rates which has hit highly geared landlords.

Then there are the regulatory changes that will include the nonsense EPC standards which are costly to implement.

Plus, we have the Renters’ Rights Bill which will tip the playing field very much in favour of tenants.

It was nice to see Ben Beadle of the NRLA at the committee declaring – straight out of the gate – that landlords are in favour of abolishing section 21.

We really aren’t Ben.

Discuss a landlord exodus

However, if we are going to discuss a landlord exodus, we also have to confront some truths – a lot of us are planning to retire.

Most landlords invested years ago and are now looking to cash in and put their feet up. Who can blame them?

That was the purpose of the investment.

But there are fewer investors following us into the PRS. I can understand why.

The new Bill will make life more difficult, and can you be bothered with it anymore?

Why struggle trying to get your property back when the courts don’t care about landlords?

Landlords selling up

I read every week on Property118 about landlords selling up, so here’s a quick rundown for Mr Pennycook to stop saying daft things in public:

And let’s finish with this classic from the same committee meeting when the bloke from Shelter said that the abolition of section 21 won’t lead to an increase in homelessness – and tenants need tighter eviction rules.

Now THIS is the kind of nonsense that will frustrate landlords and help them towards the exit.

Landlord exodus not being taken seriously

I added my previous column because I suspected at the time that the landlord exodus was not being taken seriously enough.

That was just three weeks ago, and the housing minister’s statement proves this issue is being ignored.

If so many good/reputable organisations are stating clearly that a sell-off is underway, who are we to disbelieve them?

Why would a housing minister decide that he knows better than they do?

And why does everyone STILL misunderstand the role of Section 21 in possession proceedings?

Renters’ Rights Bill is nonsense on stilts

But the fact is that the Renters’ Rights Bill is nonsense on stilts – landlords are being held to account for the antics of tenants and a court system that can’t cope.

We won’t be allowed to refuse most tenants, but we will have to impose stricter criteria on the tenants we do want.

Mainly, those that can pay!

The bottom line is that we don’t need any landlord to leave – the level of demand keeps growing and we need a PRS that functions.

No one seems to understand this basic fact.

These are dangerous times for all landlords, both large and small.

I knew that Labour in government was going to be bad, but I didn’t appreciate how bad they would be and so early in their reign.

And we still have the potential disaster of the Budget next week from Rachel ‘Thieves’.

If Pennycook doesn’t believe the figures now, let’s see his reaction after the death knell is sounded by his Chancellor and a huge wave of selloffs begins.

Housing crisis? You ain’t seen nothing yet.

Until next time,

The Landlord Crusader


Share This Article


Comments

NewYorkie

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

20:23 PM, 25th October 2024, About 3 days ago

Reply to the comment left by Tom McGrath at 25/10/2024 - 18:44
Where did the money go from the homes they sold?

Cause For Concern

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

11:37 AM, 26th October 2024, About 2 days ago

Reply to the comment left by Neil P at 25/10/2024 - 11:07
Ben Beadle is truly pathetic! It's like being attacked by an angry lamb.
Wake up man, you're supposed to be fighting for landlords' rights, and not appeasing Pennycook and agreeing with all the notions which the labour party has which will serve to destroy the PRS.

Tony Edwards

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

12:46 PM, 26th October 2024, About 2 days ago

investors in many properties tell me they are only interested in HMO now,Ipswich council restricting permission for these now probably due to a big increase in HMO properties as a result of this. So many cannot afford the £600 pcm for a room being asked in registered properties.

berkstunt

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

14:54 PM, 26th October 2024, About 2 days ago

Reply to the comment left by NewYorkie at 25/10/2024 - 11:02
I became a landlord in the early 80's, letting to university students. Fortunately, a transient source, so never a problem getting possession,
The thought of having a sitting tenant scared the life out of me, until one day I learned of the new Housing Act (1988?) whereby a Section 21 Notice to Quit, if issued correctly, was a mandatory ground for Possession (a court HAD to grant it), It enabled me to get my property back on two occasions, when lumbered with absolute rogue tenants. I now let to family members (which presents its own problems) but as sure as "eggs is eggs", I will NEVER ever be a landlord again, now that S21 is set to be abolished. I could just about cope with all the punitive anti-landlord regulations, but . . .

PAUL BARTLETT

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

21:13 PM, 27th October 2024, About 11 hours ago

Reply to the comment left by Retired banker at 25/10/2024 - 14:36
"Maybe they do deserve a bigger cut? After all the successive failure of governments of all hues to build sufficient houses for many years is in large part responsible for the increases we have seen in capital values and rents."

Quantitive Easing, AKA printing money is also a large factor in the capital values so indexing should eliminate that from capital gains tax because government is fully responsible for that delusion.

Clearly the Right to Buy should have been paired with a proportionate Duty To Build on the Local Authorities in order to maintain the Social Housing stock. Central government should have integrated that Duty with an Industrial Strategy and Planning law reform that would drive Volume efficiency and redevelop brownfield sites that otherwise are land banked.

Stella

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

22:28 PM, 27th October 2024, About 10 hours ago

Reply to the comment left by berkstunt at 26/10/2024 - 14:54
We had a protected tenant in the late seventies and eighties and it is not something I would want again.
Not only did they have security of tenure and paid only a nominal rent they could even pass the property on to relatives and under certain circumstances to others who moved into the property.

The thoughts of the RRB is very scary and in many ways it will be worse than things were pre 1988 housing act because back then we did not have selective licensing and all the cmpliance, rent repayment orders etc.

History is repeating itself and we will now have protected tenants and rent capping by the back door with very little possibility of ever getting the property back.

Leave Comments

In order to post comments you will need to Sign In or Sign Up for a FREE Membership

or

Don't have an account? Sign Up

Landlord Automated Assistant Read More