9:52 AM, 24th April 2024, About 6 months ago 52
Text Size
As the Renters (Reform) Bill heads back to Parliament, the proposals have led to criticism from both renter campaign groups and the National Residential Landlords Association (NRLA).
MPs will debate the Bill today with 122 pages of nearly 200 amendments to debate and agree on.
But while the NRLA says the Bill is a fair compromise, with the abolition of Section 21 ‘no-fault’ evictions and new protections for tenants, like a Decent Homes Standard and a property portal.
Landlords would also be banned from discriminating against families or benefit recipients.
That’s not the view of the Renters’ Reform Coalition and Generation Rent – who say the Bill ‘will be a failure’ because the government has made too many concessions to backbench MPs.
The NRLA’s chief executive, Ben Beadle, said: “This Bill delivers a fair deal for tenants and responsible landlords. In the interests of certainty for the sector it is now time to ensure the Bill passes through Parliament.
“For renters, the Bill will abolish section 21 repossessions and fixed term tenancies, introduce a Decent Homes Standard for the sector, a new Ombudsman and Property Portal which landlords will have to join as well as measures to protect families and those in receipt of benefits from discrimination.
“Going forward, it will always be for the courts to decide if landlords have met the threshold to repossess a property based on a series of legitimate reasons.
“This includes tenant anti-social behaviour, serious rent arrears or where a landlord plans to sell a property.”
He adds: “A number of the amendments proposed to the Bill enact recommendations by the cross-party housing select committee.
“Taken together they would ensure a balanced Bill that protects tenants and ensures it is viable for responsible landlords to continuing renting properties out.”
The Renters’ Reform Coalition says that the Bill ‘will be a failure’ in its current form.
The group says that the Bill would need major changes to meet its aims of achieving a ‘better deal for renters’.
A spokesperson said: “We have been clear from the outset that the Renters (Reform) Bill would have no chance of achieving these aims without significant changes.
“Unfortunately, as groups representing and working alongside private tenants in England, our concerns have not been taken seriously.
“It is revealing that ministers have met with lobbyists for landlords and estate agents twice as often as they have met groups representing renters.”
They added: “The result of all the government’s backtracking is that we have now have a bill that abolishes section 21 in name only – there is no guarantee it would ever fully abolish section 21, and even then, the new tenancy system set to replace it will be little better.
“This legislation is intended to give the impression of improving conditions for renters, but in fact it preserves the central power imbalance at the root of why renting in England is in crisis.”
The group says that tenants face insecurity with more than a quarter living in three or more private rented homes in the previous five years.
They also claim that poor conditions ‘are rife’ and that 22% of privately renting households don’t make complaints because they fear eviction.
There are also worries over affordability and ‘record numbers’ are being made homeless.
The coalition says it wants all concessions made to backbench MPs to be reversed, tenants to get four months’ instead of two, not ‘trapping’ tenants into six month tenancies.
They also don’t want the selective licensing burden on landlords to be reviewed and protecting tenant evictions in the first two years of a tenancy.
And give the courts discretion over whether an eviction should take place.
They also want rent rises restricted so there are no Section 21 ‘economic’ evictions, so the rise is not unaffordable to the tenant.
Ben Twomey, the chief executive of Generation Rent, said: “Everyone deserves to feel secure in their own home, which is why the government committed to end section 21 ‘no-fault’ evictions over five years ago.
“The Renters (Reform) Bill does not deliver the original promise that landlords will ‘no longer be able to unexpectedly evict families with only 8 weeks’ notice’.
“Renters were promised once-in-a-generation change but if this Bill passes in its current form, we could still be just a couple of months away from homelessness, even if we play by all the rules set by landlords.”
He added: “That’s why as a bare minimum we’re calling on the government to double eviction notice periods to four months, while increasing the time tenants can spend in their home without fear of eviction from six months to two years.”
Previous Article
Renters (Reform) Bill - The key amendments to look out forNext Article
BRP cards to be scrapped?
Stella
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up13:39 PM, 24th April 2024, About 6 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Lee Bailey at 24/04/2024 - 11:06
The government make little efford to conceal what is happening.
The legal right to control our assets is being taken from us and it is all done in plain sight.
Neilt
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up14:09 PM, 24th April 2024, About 6 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Reluctant Landlord at 24/04/2024 - 08:54
As a long term member I cancelled my subscription a few years ago. Maybe others should too.
Carol
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up14:14 PM, 24th April 2024, About 6 months ago
I have sold 14 of my 15 properties over the last 3 years. Some were HMO's. All bought by owner occupiers. I have been a good landlord over the last 20 years, helped many onto the property ladder and have many testimonies from grateful tenants.
The NRLA do not represent landlords and the help line is a joke.
I could see the writing on the wall. Last landlord out switch off the light. You are no longer valued or wanted.
Freda Blogs
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up14:45 PM, 24th April 2024, About 6 months ago
There may be worse news than shown here - another Labour proposal that I have seen on Landlord Zone: 'Leading landlord warns sector over Labour's 'radical plans' suggests
Labour "is proposing to remove rent arrears entirely as a ground for possession and introduce a ‘test’ for all other grounds to ensure an eviction did not cause a sitting tenant to endure any hardship."
Seriously? How many landlords could or would enter into any new tenancy in the knowledge that the tenant has complete freedom not to pay rent without facing eviction. This is a completely unsustainable proposition.
To cap it all, with Labour wanting "to stop landlords from selling a property for two years after a tenant moves in and that the property is offered for sale to the incumbent tenants before putting it on the open market" - could this mean that a LL, being financially stuffed because of the non-paying tenant and needs to sell, then has to offer the house to said tenant? LL can’t get possession because of the new rules so tenant can offer a silly price to buy the property? LL may have no money left so can’t refuse. Great win for a savvy but unscrupulous tenant.
Nothing in the proposed RRB seems reasonable, proportional or fair to LLs.
Stewart
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up18:16 PM, 24th April 2024, About 6 months ago
The NLA have done a poor job. Section 21 was perfectly sensible and it was very useful to help tenants who wanted to move but didn't want to make themselves homeless. Now if they are in private housing but want social housing they will have problems.
Cider Drinker
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up18:29 PM, 24th April 2024, About 6 months ago
What gets my goat is that many of the grounds under Section 8 are ‘no fault’ of the tenant. Many Section 21 Notices have been served for reasons not disclosed.
It is absolutely essential that court reform precedes the abolition of Section 21. Property owners must have confidence that their investments are reasonably secure.
The NRLA is a disgrace.
I suspect Ben Beadle is looking for an OBE or peerage (similar to the OBE and peerage awarded to Boris’s sycophants, Simon Clarke and Ben(t) Houchen.
Stella
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up19:23 PM, 24th April 2024, About 6 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Cider Drinker at 24/04/2024 - 18:29
Ben and others who are supposed to represent us are very quick to agree to the removal of section 21 because I assume they do not know what it was like when there was no section 21.
It will be the last straw if we do not have a mandatory ground for when we need to sell or renovate.
Keith Wellburn
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up23:06 PM, 24th April 2024, About 6 months ago
Stating a minority of renters have lived in 3 or more homes within 5 years is utterly meaningless without any context. It’s possibly even an endorsement of a sector that allows those who seek mobility whilst studying or for career advancement to move about.
For crying out loud, I OWNED 3 consecutive homes (my own home not rental investments) in a four year period in my younger days. I appreciate that many younger people can’t own as easily, but just imagine the stamp duty, legal, mortgage and estate agent fees, not to mention the hassle, of doing that nowadays if circumstances dictated being mobile.
Stella
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up23:24 PM, 24th April 2024, About 6 months ago
Just had a look at the NRLA website and apparently it will be up to a Judge to decide whether we can sell our property or not.
It will obviously be a discretionary ground.
This is their idea of being fair to landlords!
Crouchender
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up7:04 AM, 25th April 2024, About 6 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Stella at 24/04/2024 - 23:24Mangall was the only MP that lead the debate with support for LLs and he even said he would vote against the bill in the end. Yes the Labour lot will bring in eviction ban straight away as Scotland did and they will also make the Portal a heavily regulated selective licensing system with bolt and whistles on it like use of Section 8 notices. Boy are we in for a very rough ride for at least 5 years and with no-one to protect us. The only way to protect yourself is unfortunately to sell