16:25 PM, 6th March 2018, About 7 years ago 56
Text Size
Follow up letter to Nottingham City Councillors regarding disastrous Selective Licensing that will force me into making 350 people homeless
Dear Rav & John,
Regarding your letter dated 2 March 2018.
You say you are not sure if I’m aware, but the Council undertook an extensive consultation. No I was not aware of the consultation nor were my many tenants and many landlord colleagues. I’m one of the biggest Housing Benefits landlords in the Nottingham and despite my many weekly conversations with your team, Selective Licensing was never mentioned. Why did you not contact HB tenants, probably the most important people that were and are going to be effected?
One of my colleagues turned up and Councillor Urquhart said she had to leave in 10mins-Was that wise?
Jon, IF the cost was less than £2pw, do you think we would be moaning?
Where do you get £2pw from?
What about the accreditation cost? Which in my case is £840 EVERY 3 years. (DASH is FREE everywhere else in the East Midlands apart from your City)
The Landlords so far that have had the DASH checks are getting bills of £700 upwards.
Add up the Licence fee £400.
Add the DASH fee £120.
Add the works fee £1000.
Add the Letting Agents set up fee £600.
Add the Letting Agents weekly 10% + VAT of rent fee £15.23 PER WEEK. £791 PER YEAR.
Whose paying for the floor plans you require, the DBS checks, the tenant referencing checks, the insurance loading, PAT testing, landlord training etc? Sort of makes your £2 a week claim very weak.
It will cost us over £3,000 per property in the first year. I may be exaggerating these figures, but you don’t rent a house thinking you never gonna’ spend a penny on it. You budget for ‘what could happen’.
Please sit down with us & discuss how we are going to do this for £2pw!!! And the conditions too. Worse than any Letting agent with the poshest tenants would ask.
You keep mentioning 2 part fee. It still got to be paid? Are you advocating finance?
Come look at my business and tell me what I can do with 70 houses, 350 people living in them. Which I manage perfectly well. Give me and my tenants a solution ‘cause I’ve already issued 10 section 21’s which I didn’t really want to do. But the clock is ticking.
You seem to reject everything. Time will tell. I have new boilers kitchens doors etc. Your fees will now take away from that budget. Does that not bother you?
You and David Hobbs seem to be copying the same letter. So you are losing me with your confusing comments which need to be discussed verbally. Real shame when homelessness is at stake.
Please stop mentioning Universal Credit ‘cause you han’t got a clue on that.
And let me tell you for a fact, tenants from Housing Aid referrals Housing Benefit ARE more likely to cause damage. Do you want me to bring 10 Landlords with HB tenants to prove this?
I want Long term tenants, your policies and conditions will be getting them chucked out.
I’m speaking to Letting Agents this morning Your Move, big National Brand, showing them ALL YOUR conditions, they said anyone with more than a few houses cannot physically do all them conditions without a letting agent.
You go through the conditions, add up the time with each one, And times it by a fair number of houses, and tell me if I’ve got the time to do that?
To put houses with a Letting Agent are fees of £42,000 alone set up fees. This is on top of the £112,000 we mention. Where is the money coming from?
Bigger problem, Letting Agents won’t take my current HB tenants. What now?
They have said with a few houses, yes, but not with the amount of houses I’ve got. Impossible.
Me and some of my colleagues with HB tenants would like a meeting with you. This is very serious & we need a meeting ugently.
I’m shocked that you have not even spoken to Housing Aid yet and understand the impact it’s having on them with Landlords going for eviction because of this Licensing.
I think you should back down now before it does get really messy with lots of evictions and do it on new tenancies.
You haven’t answered the question on Thumbturn locks, the tenants don’t want them ‘cause their kids will let themselves out and get knocked over on the road.
24 hour number?
What if tenants aren’t letting you in?
I’m providing basic good all essentials accommodation let’s say Travelodge. Your conditions now require us to run it like the Marriott. On the same money? And you think £2pw more will cover this? Come on, please.
Who is paying for tenant referencing, inventories, floor plans, checks etc.?
Let me tell you what will happen. I and many Landlords will have to give rent increases to cover this increased cost. A lot of tenants won’t be able to pay this rent increase. We then give them the Section 21. They go homeless and get housed in bed and breakfast which costs THOUSANDS.
This will be the same for the HB tenants that tend to look after the property less, but I don’t have to fix their self-caused damage as not dangerous, but you will make me fix this, so they too will have to be evicted.
I will also call the Nottingham Post to cover and photo the first eviction because of Nottingham Selective Licensing.
Once these HB tenants go, I will do the property up, to the Marriott standard, and get the Marriott standard tenants in, as I have 3 Letting Agent tenants already and they are SUPER. Super posh Letting agent tenants that will be easier to comply with your conditions.
Is this judgement affecting anything you do?
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2018/242.html
We don’t have low housing demand in my areas.
The unanimous CoA decision was “…any selective licensing condition that requires the *provision of new facilities* or that *requires works*, which go *beyond normal non-structural repairs*, were imposed by a local authority in their discretion is unlawful.”
You haven’t answered these questions:
I understand you have 27000 homes.
If they you NCH can’t do this, how can I be expected to do this?
You probably have more staff ratio per houses than I do.
But I do manage my houses well as is, and all new boilers, new kitchens, doors, windows etc.
But if you couldn’t do what is asked of Selective Licensing, how can I be expected to?
I work 70 hours pw now on the tenants houses, admin, managing. I physically could not do or have the time to do these conditions. So I have to leave with a Letting Agent. Problem is, Letting Agent will not take these tenants. What do we do? When my houses come empty, all my future tenants was going be Letting Agent tenants, as I’ve been doing it 20 years & have no more energy to carry on with my current HB tenants, but for now the only option you are leaving me with is giving them Section 21’s.
What if my tenants have signed a tenancy, they’ve signed this tenancy, as long as don’t have to comply with any future Licensing scheme that current or future authority may bring in. Something like:
The tenant doesn’t give permission for anyone to enter property apart from the Landlord or The Gas safety man, unless anything is dangerous & workmen need to get in quick. Do we now have to break tenancy law?
Where is your answer to where my tenants have caused internal damage? Have we now got to fix these internal doors she has smashed? What do you think is going to happen when we have fixed them and she smashes them again?
Does she deserve to be homeless for that?
What are you on about offer from Housing Aid? You’ve lost me?
Housing Aid can no longer house their tenants with your conditions. I CANNOT believe you haven’t spoke to them yet to find this out.
As said, a meeting is urgently needed to avoid some disastrous homelessness and business’s going bust in the next 2-5 years.
Mick Roberts
Previous Article
JRF report is a missed opportunity to sort out Government's mess
Luke P
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up14:04 PM, 9th March 2018, About 7 years ago
Here you are, Mick...perhaps some more ammo for you to show SL will increase rents *even further* than the result topping E. Mids data shown here: http://www.propertyindustryeye.com/headline-growth-in-rents-masks-real-terms-fall-figures-suggest/
Gromit
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up8:48 AM, 10th March 2018, About 7 years ago
You couldn't make it up. They drive out Landlords and then have spend (via NCH) £10m to house 50 families.
https://westbridgfordwire.com/city-council-loan-10m-improve-conditions-homeless-people/
Arnie Newington
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up9:44 AM, 10th March 2018, About 7 years ago
In Scotland when they brought in HMO licensing they brought in standards for fire detection that were higher than current building standards.
I complained to the council who blamed the fire brigade who blamed the councillors, who blamed the Scottish Government, who blamed the fire brigade.
In short I spent a long time fighting a battle that I couldn’t win and would have been better spent in getting a better solution to the problem (I had originally been quoted £4K for a new alarm system and in the end only paid £1200).
In the meantime rents for HMO properties rose significantly as other landlords left the sector and they are now a highly sought after cash cow.
I suspect if the landlord who wrote the letter sold one property he could fund the upgrade costs and give it a year and rent will increase significantly as the supply of properties meeting the standard falls which will cover licensing costs. He would also be advised to move away from the Housing Benefit sector when current tenants move out.
I now have an attitude to government regulation similar to Willy Wonka when he says stop, no, don’t as I know that it doesn’t really hurt me as a landlord and trying to explain to Shelter, the media and government that they are making a mistake is like reading to a dog.
Finally I would say that they have since dropped the fire safety standard to the same as new build housing and it only took ten years before they realised their mistake.
Mick Roberts
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up10:04 AM, 10th March 2018, About 7 years ago
That's interesting, showing the figures.
And that's before the effects of the Licensing.
Yes my argument this week with them was:
Wed 7 Mar 18 Nottingham Licensing says thumbturn locks are standard on new house. BINGO. You’ve just hit the nail on the head. WE AIN’T GOT NEW HOUSES!!!!!
tony tony
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up12:50 PM, 10th March 2018, About 7 years ago
Reply to the comment left by Mick Roberts at 10/03/2018 - 10:04
mick have all councill houses got thumbturn locks on , also are all councill houses upto scratch in that matter and who are going to pass theres probably them selves, also are they putting the same amount of money per house in the kitty to pay towards the extra staff as landlords or do they get away with all this malarky ?
Monty Bodkin
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up13:53 PM, 10th March 2018, About 7 years ago
Reply to the comment left by tony tony at 10/03/2018 - 12:50Nottingham council estates clearly don't have any problems;
file:///C:/Users/si_hu/Downloads/Selective%20Licensing%20Scheme%20-%20FAQs%20(1).pdf
The Council has undertaken evidence based research that shows there are problems with privately rented properties, including high crime, high antisocial behaviour, poor property conditions and high levels of deprivation.
...............................
7. Will registered social landlords be required to apply for a licence?
No.
Michael Barnes
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up14:31 PM, 10th March 2018, About 7 years ago
Reply to the comment left by Barry Fitzpatrick at 08/03/2018 - 20:52
"Council say scheme will be cost neutral" = "tenants will pay, not council tax payers".
In other words "we are spending someone else's money".
tony tony
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up14:55 PM, 10th March 2018, About 7 years ago
Reply to the comment left by Monty Bodkin at 10/03/2018 - 13:53
why is that then any idea ?
Luke P
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up15:40 PM, 10th March 2018, About 7 years ago
Reply to the comment left by tony tony at 10/03/2018 - 14:55
Is simply a matter of the wording of the legislation. It is a specific piece of law that only targets, and therefore references, privately owned BTL properties. In much the same way as many other (all-encompassing general industry legislation only applies to rental properties and not owner-occupied), e.g. smoke/CO alarms…not necessary in your own home. Double standards, with this being yet another example.
Mick Roberts
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up15:43 PM, 10th March 2018, About 7 years ago
Tony, Yes they ain't even listening to the Council house ain't got this stuff argument.