New owner of downstairs flat saying I can’t let out property

New owner of downstairs flat saying I can’t let out property

22:56 PM, 18th June 2015, About 10 years ago 24

Text Size

I own a 1st floor London flat in a 2 story purpose built maisonette in a residential street where the majority of flats are let out. It is share of freehold with a shared garden. New owner of downstairs flat saying I can't let out property

Recently the ground floor flat was sold and the new owner wanted me to exclude my tenants (4 people) from the garden as he wanted to enjoy sole access. I declined as my tenants have cleary rented my property on the basis that they can use the garden but I suggested he might want to buy it from me. Now he is quoting the lease (“… to keep and use the demised premises and all buildings for the time being standing thereon as a private flat and curtilage only in the occupation of one family and for no other purpose”) and insinuating I cannot let the flat out.

Clearly it was rented when he bought his, he knew this and was happy to proceed. The icing on the cake however is his last comment saying that if I effectively give him the garden he doesn’t mind me renting the flat out. So I guess a form of blackmail.

Anyone got any experience that may help here?

Clearly I am minded now to ensure he never, ever gets sole access to the garden.

Thanks in advance

Colin


Share This Article


Comments

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

17:20 PM, 9th July 2015, About 10 years ago

Brazen it out, he's all talk, tell him you will sue him for your legal costs, interfering with your rights to quiet possession, and let him do is worst, be Mr Cool ... County Court fear often stops them in their tracks ..

Itchy Scratchy

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

23:09 PM, 9th July 2015, About 10 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "Bob Sherwood" at "09/07/2015 - 17:20":

A friend had a very similar problem a few years ago with the term 'family' being on the covenant. His solicitor concluded that 'family' was such a loose term that the 3 sharers that were in the flat could be classed as such - problem solved.

Freda Blogs

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

12:55 PM, 11th July 2015, About 10 years ago

Did the new owner know about the four sharers before he bought the flat and proceeded anyway? If so, it might be argued that he has 'acquiesced in the breach' (a legal term), and has no basis to complain now.

Col Mac

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

9:51 AM, 13th July 2015, About 10 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "Freda Blogs" at "11/07/2015 - 12:55":

Thanks Freda yes they knew!

Leave Comments

In order to post comments you will need to Sign In or Sign Up for a FREE Membership

or

Don't have an account? Sign Up

Landlord Automated Assistant Read More