Massive cost after Grenfell cladding found on my building?

Massive cost after Grenfell cladding found on my building?

10:49 AM, 2nd November 2017, About 7 years ago 43

Text Size

The Grenfell fire has quite rightly forced all owners of high-rise blocks of flats to consider their safety, and in particular, analyse their cladding, if any.

I am the leaseholder of a flat in such a building.

It has been told it has the same cladding as Grenfell Tower, and must be removed and replaced, at a cost of over one million pounds. Each of the 90+ privately owned flats is about to be billed (over two years) for £13,500, plus a further £5000 for additional safety measures that have been recommended (fire-watch, etc.)

The insurance company have stated that as the building has not been damaged, they are not involved.

The Management company is convinced we should all have to pay – apart from their employer – the Freeholder.

It will ruin many leaseholders, including me.

Is the Freeholder liable – for allowing such a situation to take place about eight years ago, or inheriting such a situation (before they actually bought the Freehold!) We are putting our faith in our local M.P.

Anyone else having this same problem?

James


Share This Article


Comments

Paul Fay

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

17:22 PM, 7th November 2017, About 7 years ago

Reply to the comment left by Chris Daniel at 07/11/2017 - 16:48
If you were proceedings in contract, the freeholder may be the target but not in negligence. In practice i suspect that it would be the management company on the hook in contract.

Giles Peaker

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

11:19 AM, 8th November 2017, About 7 years ago

Reply to the comment left by Chris Daniel at 07/11/2017 - 16:48
Chris, the freehold is worth very little, and handing it over would still leave the leaseholders having to pay. If freeholder is a company, they would simply go bust. Or assign the freehold to another company.

That is even if there was a claim against the freeholder. Which there isn’t.

Giles Peaker

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

11:23 AM, 8th November 2017, About 7 years ago

Reply to the comment left by Paul Fay at 07/11/2017 - 17:19
And the manufacturer will point to the fire safety lab company that certified their products. No contractual claim (and out of time even if there were) and no negligence claim as no duty of care and no damage (and out of time even if there were).

1 2 3 4 5

Leave Comments

In order to post comments you will need to Sign In or Sign Up for a FREE Membership

or

Don't have an account? Sign Up

Landlord Automated Assistant Read More