19:09 PM, 27th September 2023, About A year ago 38
Text Size
The Liberal Democrats have pledged to give private rented sector (PRS) tenants and landlords a ‘fair deal’ in their newly published policy paper which would see three-year tenancies and ‘rent smoothing’ – or rent controls – being introduced.
Plans would also see landlords having to apply for a licence – ‘much like getting a driver’s licence’ – before they could rent out a property, and the system would see a national register of landlords being created.
Landlord licensing would see service quality being improved, the party claims, and ‘bad landlords would have their licences revoked’. Landlords with holiday lets would also need to be licensed.
The proposals also include a pledge to ban section 21 ‘no-fault’ evictions.
The policy paper – ‘Tackling the Housing Crisis’ – comes after the Lib Dems’ annual conference in Bournemouth, alongside the publication of other policy documents.
However, party leader Sir Ed Davey made no mention of the party’s plans for the PRS in his speech on the final day of the conference.
In their policy paper, the Lib Dems state that England’s PRS is ‘unfair and under-regulated’ and want to introduce powers to tackle bad landlords and tenants.
They say: “England’s private rental sector is fundamentally unfair and under-regulated. For decades, the assumption has been that private rental was a temporary stop gap before homeownership, or a lifestyle choice.
“This is no longer the case; millions of people, especially the young, ethnic minorities and those on lower incomes, are stuck permanently in private rentals, with no prospect of the affordability of a council or housing association home or the security of homeownership.”
Under its proposed plans, all landlords would need a licence to rent out their property and there would be a national register of landlords – maintained by local councils.
The party says to gain the licence, landlords must meet minimum standards on safety and service provision. The process would set out what is required of landlords and would be administered locally.
The policy paper says: “We do not believe requiring landlords to get a licence and meet minimum standards would deter investment in the sector.
“We believe a licence would drive up the quality of service provision in the private rental sector, as bad landlords would have their licences revoked or denied if they failed to meet the requirements.”
The new licensing system would also require all rental properties to meet national minimum standards on safety, the environment and service provision. There would be a specific focus on ending the ‘national scandal’ of damp and mould in homes.
The party also says that all rental properties will have to meet high environmental and safety standards under energy efficiency requirements for landlords it would introduce.
The party also plans to remove the proposed £10,000 cost cap on the energy performance certificate (EPC) improvements that were scrapped by the Prime Minister, Rishi Sunak.
The party would give landlords five years to reach an EPC rating of C, and 10 years to reach an EPC B rating.
The party claims a survey from 2021 indicates that 8% of private renters in England had received a no-fault eviction that year, while 32% were concerned they would be asked to move out in the next 12 months.
The paper states: “It goes against the liberal principle of equality that landlords have the power to make someone homeless on a whim. We would scrap Section 21 of the 1988 Housing Act, ending no-fault evictions.”
Eviction rules will also be changed so that landlords can only evict tenants in specific and proven circumstances, such as failure to pay rent or damaging the property.
The party says to prevent landlords from evicting tenants and increasing rents, they plan to introduce ‘rent smoothing’ – which is a form of rent control since rents can only increase by the Bank of England Base Rate during the contract period.
The Lib Dems say: “The interest rate, rather than inflation, is more relevant to the costs a landlord faces since property is a financial and investment asset rather than a labour-intensive business. This would not lead to the harms caused by blanket rent control, as landlords could increase rents at the end of a contract period.”
The party also plans to extend the default tenancy from one year to three years – and says that three years ‘strikes the right balance’.
In the policy paper, the party says: “Tenants, especially vulnerable people and children, need stability, whilst not starving the rental market of available properties. We believe three years strikes the right balance.”
The paper also says that the Local Housing Allowance (LHA) would be linked ‘to the real level of local rents’.
The policy paper ends with this statement: “We do not see evidence that the proposals outlined here would significantly reduce the availability of privately rented properties on the market. Bad landlords who exploit their tenants may leave the market – but ultimately their property would either be sold to better landlords or to new owner-occupiers.”
You can read the full Housing Policy Paper on the Lib Dems website.
Previous Article
Council reveals its housing crisis as private landlords sell up
Mr Blueberry
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up14:06 PM, 28th September 2023, About A year ago
The Lib Dem reports says,"We do not see evidence that the proposals outlined here would significantly reduce the availability of privately rented properties on the market.
This Lib Dem statement is untrue.
There is a significant percent of PRS Landlords leaving the sector now. The estimated number is 143,000 for 2023. Over half are not being sold to other landlords as the properties no longer fall into the category of a good PRS investment.
When rental incomes fall below other alternative investments landlords do leave the sector. For example NS&I investment bond at 6.1% provides a better income than 30% of all existing PRS investments.
Michael Booth
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up14:49 PM, 28th September 2023, About A year ago
Absolute bonkers there are new builds that don't reach epc b, thank goodness they will never get in , only by coalition if that's the case sell up .
Dickie Withers
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up15:57 PM, 28th September 2023, About A year ago
We are doomed. So does that mean I will have to evict my tenants of seven years? Apply for a licence and then re-let to new tenants? I can't see my properties reaching an EPC of B unless they are knocked down and rebuilt
Teessider
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up16:26 PM, 28th September 2023, About A year ago
If they bring back some decent Feed in Tariffs, I’ll consider Solar PV.
However, I cannot justify spending £8,000 when the annual rent is £6,000 or less. Rent would rise by around 15% to recover my investment and the tenants wouldn’t benefit financially.
Neil Robb
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up17:30 PM, 28th September 2023, About A year ago
I love these well educated people that don't have a glue.
Having a 5 % in crease on rent is not the same as a 5% mortgage increase.
Government already acknowledge 2 million homes will never reach EPC of C.
In Scotland northern Ireland have had licensing for landlords for years . Not made a single bit of difference .
What does he call the 194 pieces of legislation that the private sector landlord has to comply with.
Scotland brought in rent evict ban .
I for the time being stopped buying there.
It needs pointed out sec 21 34% increase was to do with a few things COVID ban and also if other sections were mandatory rent arrears criminal anti social behaviour were mandatory the use of sec 21 would be rare.
Out of the five million private tenancies very few get evicted when you look at the figures.
Around 66% of court time is taken up evicting social housing tenants
Slooky
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up9:39 AM, 29th September 2023, About A year ago
"not labour intensive". Is he joking, these people have absolutely no idea. My husband has spent practically a whole year at our rental building working 6 days a week.
The year prior to COVID he spent more than a year refurbing one of our flats, which also involved works to the roof. He is a self employed builder and when COVID money was being thrown at everybody we found out he wasn't entitled because he had spent so long working on our rentals rather than his self employment. It was hard to hear people laughing about the "easy" money they received when we needed help. During COVID when people were told to stay at home and not go out, landlords were told they had to carry on as normal. At our age we did not want to visit our properties because all the tenants were young and thought they were invincible and therefore they did not take as much care as we did. I remember when I had to go to a builders merchant at the beginning when no one could get any masks I put hand sanitiser up my nose, 🤣. The government's attitude towards landlords was terrible at this time but people are generally unaware of this.
Our building is very cost intensive because it is a 4 storey end of terrace listed building. Maintenance costs are high. To say that the only variable we are subject to is the interest rate is the most stupid thing I have heard. Material costs have gone through the roof, contractors are so busy they give you ridiculously high prices which has been a real eye opener. My husband is getting older, so jobs he has always done we have had to get quotes and it has been a real eye opener. They seem to want double what he would have charged. We just had 3 lead valleys re- leaded at a cost of £13500. Scaffold alone costs £5000 to put round the building. Our flats are starter flats mainly for young people just starting out so we can't charge the massive rents that many other listed properties charge. The current housing crisis is helping us because we have been able to increase the rents and I will continue to do so online with other market rents. This finally means that the rents are coming somewhere near to matching the costs of the building. Ordinary houses and purpose built flats will always have the potential to make more profit than us because their maintenance costs are so much lower than ours. But it is finally our time because hopefully if listed buildings are exempt from EPC regs it will finally be our time. But who knows what will happen. At some point they may break us, and if that happens we will likely sell our own house and move into the property and convert the 5 flats into one house. So a loss of 5 value for money rentals. We will not likely sell because of the capital gains tax. The tax will be about 90K. Which I realise some people will say what am I complaining about but if we sell the property the proceeds are not even enough to buy a 3 bed house in our town. (These listed buildings are valued at so much less than people imagine)
JamesB
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up10:37 AM, 29th September 2023, About A year ago
Reply to the comment left by Slooky at 29/09/2023 - 09:39
I thought it was only us that lived like this!
I am the husband in this set up. I have worked intensively on my rental properties since I gave up my full time job over 20 years ago and became a builder/developer. I had a very well paid but high pressure job but it had become impossible to carry on working with the phone constantly ringing with issues in our rentals. I thought I would try to be hands off so I borrowed money to employ 2 separate teams of builders in 2 separate areas and both basically ripped me off because I was a young guy wearing a suit and stuck in an office, One said "if you can do it so much better do it yourself", so from that moment on I did.
I have since worked solidly on property for 20 years.
I literally finished refurbishing a trashed house a couple of weeks ago. My wife was fed up because I had been there 7 days a week since March. I do this. Hit a project 7 days a week for long hours for months or occasionally years at a time, but what is the point? It just keeps coming at me and on top of that every bloody politician seems to want to twist the knife.
I am not sure what has gone wrong. A decade ago I could afford to have people working with me and it was reasonably fun. Now I need to do everything alone because even a slightly experienced worker is wanting £200plus a day now which is basically £50k a year, meanwhile my profits are lower than they were 20 years ago. My van isn't ULEZ compliant, my mortgages have gone up and even more is continuously expected from an ever decreasing pot. I think I have reached my breaking point, so much so that I couldn't face anything today for the first time.
Moron policy ideas from people that don't get their hands dirty don't help.
Mick Roberts
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up11:03 AM, 29th September 2023, About A year ago
Reply to the comment left by Slooky at 29/09/2023 - 09:39
Some of us can remember
The government's attitude towards landlords was terrible at this time but people are generally unaware of this.
When Corbyn in March 2020 stood up in Parliament & demanded a rent holiday for tenants. He instantly made thousands of tenants homeless.
JamesB
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up11:37 AM, 29th September 2023, About A year ago
Reply to the comment left by Mick Roberts at 29/09/2023 - 11:03
All I will always remember is consistently across my HMOs the young twenty-something tenants in paddling pools in the gardens having a merry old time, whilst I still had to go around fixing things and then, as you say, them all being told that they didn't have to pay. For a while I thought it was the end.
Reluctant Landlord
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up13:40 PM, 29th September 2023, About A year ago
totally taklking out their ar$3.
Waffle dismissed.