9:00 AM, 9th August 2024, About 4 months ago 6
Text Size
Social and private landlord possession claims, orders, warrants and repossessions all increased dramatically between and April and June, government data reveals.
When compared to the same quarter in 2023, landlord possession claims surged from 22,526 to 24,495 (9%), orders from 16,029 to 18,436 (15%), warrants from 9,957 to 11,172 (12%), and repossessions from 5,950 to 6,927 (16%).
Also, the median average time from claim to landlord repossession has increased to 25.4 weeks, up from 22.1 weeks last year.
The MoJ also says that mortgage possession claims increased from 3,991 to 5,343 (34%), orders from 2,529 to 3,395 (34%), warrants from 2,679 to 2,918 (9%) and repossessions by county court bailiffs from 660 to 854 (29%).
There were 7,668 private landlord possession claims in the second quarter and 8,448 were accelerated claims – which is a big increase on pre-covid figures when nearly two-thirds of claims came from social landlords but they now account for a third.
The data also shows that London is home to the highest claim rates for private landlord possessions, with seven of the 10 highest rates being found here.
Barking and Dagenham have the highest rate for private landlord claims, followed by Newham and Redbridge.
A Ministry of Justice spokesperson said: “Both mortgage and landlord possessions actions have continued to rise in the current quarter.
“Mortgage claims have reached their highest volume since Q2 2019 and are now close to pre-covid volumes. This increase has been seen across all mortgage possession actions.
“All landlord possession actions have also continued to rise compared to the same period in 2023, albeit at a lesser rate than mortgage possession actions and not yet at pre-covid levels.”
The spokesperson added: “These increases in landlord possession actions are reflected across all actions for social landlord, private landlord and accelerated procedure claims.”
The landlord possession figures come as separate government data reveals a surge in landlords using no-fault evictions.
According to the Housing, Communities and Local Government department figures, 6,100 households in England were evicted using Section 21 notices in the first quarter of the year, up from 24,260 in the same period in 2023.
This is the highest figure since records began in 2018-19.
Generation Rent also points to the government data which shows that households being evicted due to landlords selling or re-letting their homes reached a record high of 45,110 in the same period.
The organisation’s chief executive, Ben Twomey, said: “Our home is the foundation of our lives, but for private renters it can be snatched away only too easily.
“We get just two months’ notice to move and no support with the costs of moving or raising a new deposit.”
He added: “Government plans to end Section 21 will stop thousands of people being made homeless because their landlord feels like getting a new tenant in, but we will still face insecurity if selling up is to become a valid ground for eviction.”
Using the same data, housing advice charity Shelter says the number of children who are homeless and living in temporary accommodation has rocketed to 151,630 – an increase of 15% in a year.
That’s the highest figure since 2004.
Its chief executive, Polly Neate, said: “As we hit yet another devastating record on homelessness, and evictions continue to rise, this government must succeed where previous governments have failed and tackle the housing emergency head on.
“Without a clear plan to invest in genuinely affordable social homes, thousands more children will be forced to grow up in damaging temporary accommodation.
“The government must urgently establish a cross-department homelessness strategy and scrap no fault evictions if we are to end homelessness.”
Nick Emmerson, the Law Society of England and Wales president, said: “The scale of our housing crisis is staggering. The rising number of eviction claims in England and Wales means that more people are at risk of being made homeless.
“Many individuals and families struggle with rent and mortgage payments as the cost-of-living crisis continues to bite.
“When threatened with eviction or repossession, legal aid is often the only hope a family or individual has to keep their home. Unfortunately, legal aid has become increasingly unavailable, as 25 million people do not have a local legal aid provider for housing advice.”
He added: “We urge the government to commit to wider reforms to the rental market, including the funding of legal aid. We also ask the government to adhere to their pledge to ban ‘no-fault’ evictions with immediate effect.”
Fred M BARRETT
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up11:03 AM, 9th August 2024, About 4 months ago
2 things not normally mentioned. Are figures from Housing Associations included now they are counted as private landlords? It is said - but I have no figures - the proportion of actions taken overall by HAs - is higher than for other private landlords. The second is section 21. No fault means the landlord can give a glowing reference to poor tenants. The tenants have more chance of getting their next place and go with less fuss as it is to both parties advantage. Section 8 is a slammed door from prospective landlords. Section 21 also means the local authority has a statutory obligation to re-house. I suspect that is the real reason for govts to want to do away with section 21 as it will save money. Section 8 means local authorities can legally say - your fault, your problem, push off, but maybe more politely.
Cider Drinker
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up19:31 PM, 9th August 2024, About 4 months ago
The government are in complete denial about the problems that mass migration brings. One of the main problems is housing. We simply do not have enough properties for everybody.
Unfair taxation and over-regulation we causing some landlords to sell up. Others are switching to short term rentals and those that remain are being more selective in the tenants that they will accept.
London will have more evictions because higher house prices amplify the impact of Section 24. All London landlords are likely to be higher rate taxpayers by virtue of the high rents. The Tories made BTL a dreadful investment and Labour even to make it even worse.
So simple
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up10:08 AM, 10th August 2024, About 4 months ago
This PRS industry was created for a reason in 1988. Its not a complicated reason.
There was massive homelessness, especially in big cities in the late 1980's.
Councils had stopped building council housing.
Inversters were not investing in residential property because they had very few powers to get their property back if they wanted it back pre 1988. REGULATED tenancies gave all the rights to tenants pre AST. There was a critical lack of property available to rent because LL had lost their rights to their own property.
The result was the 1988 housing act, creating a more positive environment for private landlords investment, with the introduction of AST's.
The result of that AST creation was that in the following 36 years, some 11 million people are now housed in some 4.5 million homes, provided by the likes of me, with zero help from any part of successive governments.
By far the greater proportion of which WERE good quality affordable houses.
That sounds like a good news story for the vast majority of LL and Tenants alike.
Then enter people who were not born in 1988, who have no recollection of the uk homelessness in the 1980's.
Their aim is to once again strengthen tenants rights and remove landlord rights. Forget whether you agree with that aim for now, that is the stated aim of the likes of GR and Shelter. To strengthen tenant rights. Thus inevitably weakening landlord rights.
Now, read again the first 8 sentences of this post above. SOUND FAMILIAR?
Why is anyone surprised that, given the attitude of successive governments to the PRS, there is a lack of supply of rental housing in the whole of the uk? When the governments removed the attractiveness of the residential housing sector that created the 4.5m homes currently in the PRS since 1988, what did they think would happen to supply, and the inevitable subsequent rise in rents.
LABOUR, please take note. The harder you hit private landlords, the more you will find that they leave the sector, and that far fewer new landlords will replace those leaving, because the sums no longer add up. YOU, LABOUR, will end up exactly where the UK was pre the 1988 Housing Act. I remember it well. It was not good for tenants. My first tenant moved into her home in June 1992. She has lived in her home since that date. I have given her 1 year to find somewhere else to live so that I can access my own money. She has been evicted by the Tories actions, and the future fear of what Labour are talking about doing to the PRS.
Please LABOUR, do not make the same mistake. If you do want rid of the PRS then please make sure you get an alternative in place FIRST. 11 million people in 4.5m houses are relying on you. That's 16% of the entire population of the UK who live in the PRS, that you are taking back to the pre 1988 system of regulation that failed so miserably.
It's not rocket science. The PRS is not a charity.
Stop biting the hand that feeds you.
1987 and 2024 are beginning to look increasingly similar from where I sit.
Ade.
Reluctant Landlord
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up10:20 AM, 10th August 2024, About 4 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Fred M BARRETT at 09/08/2024 - 11:03
agree - I'd love to know the REAL breakdown of these figures in terms of evictions by private LLs, HA, and Councils.
THAT is what really needs to be revealed! Shelter can then go suck!
Stella
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up12:05 PM, 10th August 2024, About 4 months ago
Reply to the comment left by So simple at 10/08/2024 - 10:08You have summed the situation up very well.
I have said several times that if the people proposing and implementing these draconian laws were old enough to remember the last time we had these same laws (pre 1988) they might understand why all these good landlords are getting out.
Heather G.
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up18:12 PM, 25th August 2024, About 4 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Fred M BARRETT at 09/08/2024 - 11:03
According to the MoJ, Social LLs evict more tenants (about 47% more!): "Barking and Dagenham (London region) had the highest rate for private landlord claims (850 per 100,000 households owned by a private landlord), followed by Newham (London region) and Redbridge (London region) with 823 and 652 claims per 100,000 households owned by a private landlord respectively.
Tewkesbury (South West region) had the highest social landlord possession claim rate with 1,250 per 100,000 households owned by a social landlord."