Labour MP calls for seizing properties from criminal landlords to tackle housing crisis

Labour MP calls for seizing properties from criminal landlords to tackle housing crisis

0:01 AM, 17th November 2023, About A year ago 32

Text Size

Rental properties should be seized from landlords who consistently break the rules and take advantage of tenants, says a Labour MP.

Clive Betts, the chair of the levelling up, housing and communities select committee, told the Guardian, that confiscated homes could become the property of councils, which could then use them to house people in need or sell them off to raise money for social housing.

In an interview with the Guardian, Mr Betts also said Section 21 abolition may not become a reality until after the next election and criticised Labour’s social housing policy.

Stop landlords from mistreating tenants

The Labour MP said tougher actions are needed to stop landlords from mistreating tenants.

Mr Betts told the Guardian: “Some landlords are putting tenants in appalling accommodation, they’re using the threat of eviction to make sure that they don’t get complaints and they are oblivious to the fines that are levied against them.

“All that needs to change and needs to change quickly. Not waiting for some court reforms in five or six years’ time.”

He added that a threat of properties being confiscated would be a “significant deterrent”.

“The threat of seizure would bring landlords up fairly sharply because some of those properties are worth quite a lot of money.

“This would create a significant deterrent to landlords who treated fines for letting out squalid, unsafe and overcrowded homes as simply a cost of doing business.”

Awful situation

Mr Betts said he was “extremely angry” with the government over the delay of Section 21.

The government recently announced plans that Section 21 will be shelved until the court system has been improved.

He said: “Because of the delay, no one who rents privately or under the current tenancy arrangements could have any certainty about where they would be living in a year’s time.

“It’s an awful situation for a family thinking not only about where their home will be but about where your children’s school will be, how you are going to get to work”.

Fail to build the social housing needed

The chair of the Housing Select Committee expressed criticism of Labour’s housing policy, which he said would fail to build the social housing needed to help resolve problems within the private rented sector.

Angela Rayner, the shadow housing secretary, told the party conference that a Labour government would require private developers to build more affordable housing as a price of planning consent.

The cross-party housing committee has estimated that 90,000 new social homes need to be built each year and relying on developer contributions would not deliver that.

Mr Betts told the Guardian a multibillion-pound increase in state subsidies for social housing was needed instead.

He said: “As one witness very simply said to us, you can’t have subsidised housing without subsidies, that’s going to be a challenge for any new government.”


Share This Article


Comments

dismayed landlord

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

9:48 AM, 18th November 2023, About A year ago

Reply to the comment left by Route Meister at 18/11/2023 - 09:15
Some of us already feel like we are! One of the reasons I am out. No point being made the villain of the piece when you have done you best for nearly 30 years. I can do better elsewhere for a whole lot less hassle.

Happy housing

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

9:53 AM, 18th November 2023, About A year ago

Reply to the comment left by dismayed landlord at 18/11/2023 - 09:48
Social housing cannot sustain. Building maintenance service charges have all risen drastically.

LaLo

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

11:03 AM, 18th November 2023, About A year ago

This can’t be real - it’s a sick joke in very poor taste!

Martin Hicks

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

11:22 AM, 18th November 2023, About A year ago

Reply to the comment left by Happy housing at 18/11/2023 - 09:53
One reason Margaret Thatcher sold off council properties was because of the inability of local authorities to raise sufficient funds to keep them in good repair. Her thinking was that if the new owners wished to maintain and improve the value of their newly acquired homes they would make the necessary investment and care for them. It worked.

David100

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

11:35 AM, 18th November 2023, About A year ago

Margret Thatcher was asked in an interview, "isn't selling off council houses like selling off the family silver" And she smugly replied "but we are selling the family silver, to the family" I remember at the time thinking......"you dozy old bird, you only get to do that once, and then its gone. What about the next generation"

LaLo

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

12:59 PM, 18th November 2023, About A year ago

I’m writing to my local mp about this and £30k fines - so should we all.

Ray Guselli

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

15:17 PM, 18th November 2023, About A year ago

What a coincidence?

In 2003, Betts was suspended from the House of Commons for seven days for irregularities involving the employment and visa of Jose Gasparo, a Brazilian student with previous experience as a male escort.[7] The Daily Telegraph newspaper reported on 10 July 2010 that Betts' partner and parliamentary assistant, James Thomas, had tried to edit this fact from Betts' English Wikipedia page in an attempt to cover it up.[8]

Betts was found guilty of breaching the MPs' code of conduct, with the Standards and Privileges Committee stating that he had acted "extremely foolishly" and had risked damaging public confidence in the integrity of Parliament. Particular concerns involved his failure to disclose Gasparo's background to parliamentary authorities and the fact that Betts had knowingly photocopied an altered document on Gasparo's behalf.[9] Betts gave an "unreserved apology" in a personal statement to MPs when the report was published.[10]

In 2003, Betts was subject to criticism for his accommodation expenses after he had previously campaigned for an increase in MPs' entitlements on the ground of "hardship". It was reported by The Times that Betts had "flipped" his designated second home to Yorkshire before buying a "country estate" there, before "flipping it" back to London and taking out a larger mortgage on his flat there.[11] Betts denied wrongdoing, arguing the Yorkshire property had been "two dilapidated listed buildings" and that when he became a whip he had to declare his main residence as his London flat.[12]
In 2004, he was criticised by the British Medical Association for going to Portugal with 15 fellow MPs on an all-expenses trip paid for by the fast food chain McDonald's. Betts responded that if MPs had a "puritanical" attitude about food then people would ignore what they said.[13] He faced further criticism in 2010 after it was reported that he was one of eight MPs who were renting out a "second home" in London while claiming for the cost of renting a '"third home" in the city at taxpayers' expense. Although legal, critics argued the "loophole" was allowing MPs to increase their income after the rules on parliamentary expenses were tightened.[14]
Betts employs his partner as his Senior Parliamentary Assistant on a salary up to £45,000.[15] He was listed in articles in The Daily Telegraph and The Guardian which criticised the practice of MPs employing family members, on the lines that it promotes nepotism.[16] Although MPs who were first elected in 2017 have been banned from employing family members, the restriction is not retrospective – meaning that Betts' employment of his partner is lawful.[17]

Harjit Mahal

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

18:52 PM, 18th November 2023, About A year ago

Yeah. This ain't gonna happen.
Landlords that take the p should be penalised and everyone else should increase the standard of their property and management whilst increasing rent to cover the cost.

Labour will build homes and seek to end this crisis.

Darren Sullivan

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

1:47 AM, 19th November 2023, About A year ago

What about criminal
Politicians that take a world economic forum view of you will
Own nothing and be happy? 15 minute cities which is laughable!

If this idiot were to get his way how
Long before all landlord owned
Properties were seized? How would he like it if some fool threatened to seize some of his property? where do we get these people from who once they get a bit of power think they can start threatening people.

Route Meister

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

7:50 AM, 19th November 2023, About A year ago

Reply to the comment left by LaLo at 18/11/2023 - 12:59
Writing to MPs is all a bit pointless unless they are a minister for housing.

They are not going to get government or party policy changed for you.

Leave Comments

In order to post comments you will need to Sign In or Sign Up for a FREE Membership

or

Don't have an account? Sign Up

Landlord Automated Assistant Read More