Labour: Landlords can’t evict tenants if it makes them worse off

Labour: Landlords can’t evict tenants if it makes them worse off

10:09 AM, 5th August 2024, About 3 months ago 94

Text Size

Labour is looking to prevent landlords from evicting tenants who have nowhere else to live, the Telegraph reports.

It says government ministers will propose imitating a French scheme which has ‘hardship tests’ that must be followed before an eviction is allowed.

The rule effectively bans evictions that would leave a tenant worse off.

Supported by housing minister Matthew Pennycook, the rule is aimed at reducing homelessness.

Labour is also, the newspaper highlights, in talks about the proposals to reintroduce a minimum energy performance certificate (EPC) of C for the private rented sector.

A new ‘war on landlords’

The Telegraph says the moves will raise fears of a new ‘war on landlords’ which includes losing tax breaks on mortgage interest, more red tape and stamp duty surcharges.

The newspaper says that the housing minister wants to amend the new Renters’ Rights Bill to include the hardship test.

When the Renters (Reform) Bill was making its way through Parliament, Mr Pennycook tried adding an amendment to make it harder for tenants to be evicted.

That would have seen a judge refuse a possession order if it would lead to ‘greater hardship’ to a tenant.

The amendment highlighted three issues when the hardship rule would be met: a tenant losing their job if evicted, a tenant who has terminal cancer and if the eviction leads to homelessness.

Pennycook’s amendment failed to make it

Mr Pennycook’s amendment failed to make it in the RRB, but Labour now has a 174-seat majority in Parliament.

The Telegraph also highlights that Labour will reintroduce EPC targets for landlords with a 2030 deadline.

Many landlords will be looking at expensive upgrades, but the government might have a £10,000 cap on costs.

However, those close to the discussions say that Labour might choose a higher cap – or none at all.

EPC plans for landlords

The EPC plans for landlords would, the Conservative MP for Harrow East, Bob Blackman, be ‘unfair’.

He also told the newspaper that the target for energy efficiency was ‘not practical’.

Mr Blackman also said that many PRS properties cannot be upgraded which would see landlords sell-up.

He also warns that the costs would be put onto tenants with higher rents.

The MP also says that the hardship test would be unfair for landlords who are providing a service.

‘Renters’ Rights Bill will make renting fairer for all’

A government spokesperson told the Telegraph: “The private rented sector is in desperate need of reform, and our Renters’ Rights Bill will make renting fairer for all.

“The energy shocks of recent years have also shown the urgent need to upgrade British homes so we can secure our energy independence and reduce fuel poverty.

“Responsible landlords who provide quality homes to their tenants have nothing to fear from the sensible overhaul of private rented sector regulation we intend to implement.”


Share This Article


Comments

Stella

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

12:06 PM, 9th August 2024, About 3 months ago

Reply to the comment left by Property Flipper at 09/08/2024 - 11:28
If the goverment implement the rules that existed pre 1988 housing act and getting rid of section 21 is the first step (which I think is their ultimate goal) it would be very difficult to turn this situation into a positive!

Frank Jennings

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

12:31 PM, 9th August 2024, About 3 months ago

Reply to the comment left by Property Flipper at 09/08/2024 - 11:28
That's a constructive point, indeed. How can one profit from this declining and dystopian future? That's the thing with a dystopian future, though isn't it? There is no good thing about it, no profits to be made, everybody suffers. Landlords, Tennants, housing companies, everybody!
Just like in the 1970's nobody wins! It's a loose-loose situation. I can't see how anybody can't understand that!
However, trying to be more positive, is a good approach, and selling up and investing in something more profitable and less hassle is only common sense. Of course we have the imminent arrival of CBDC's and more dystopian legislation, more tax, more hidden tax, and more fines, and traps, and fees and licences, and unfairness, and more corruption in the already corrupt system.
Investing in gold coins is a fairly safe bet. As things get worse, gold coins get even better as an investment. Physical gold coins, not the paper certificates that are too risky, and over leveraged.
Paying off your mortgage(s) if possible is important, but I'm thinking of moving abroad now, as the only viable option to protect myself from all this downward financial pressure. Escaping while you can to a fairer society has to be the best option. To go where you are treated best.
I daresay that the pendulum will swing so far and eventually stop, and start swinging in the other direction. How long this will take is anybodies guess, 10 years 20 years maybe more? Who can say?
All I know is things are getting pretty bad, and are going to get a lot worse, before it gets better. As soon as my current tennants leave, I'll be selling up, and cutting my losses. They are great tennants, and I'll bare the onslaught from our govenment as long as I can, but once a Tennant hands in their notice, the property will be up forsale.
Amen! Hasta la vista, baby!

NewYorkie

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

12:36 PM, 9th August 2024, About 3 months ago

Reply to the comment left by northern landlord at 05/08/2024 - 17:52
I have one BTL remaining. She's been a decent tenant. No arrears even when she was unemployed. But I feel she isn't being upfront in terms of who's living there, and she's being more demanding, most recently for new carpets throughout because they're 'dirty' [I haven't agreed, not my problem]. I have moved her to market rate with 2 large increases over the past 2 years, but I'm not making a profit because an eviction cost me £20k,
and there's no capital appreciation. So why am I doing this when I just want an easy retirement?

I am hesitating issuing a S21 because I will most likely have a void for some time due to the ground rent, even though it's now RTM and it's a nice city centre 2 bed with secure parking. But if I leave it too long, I fear I will be stuck for years to come.

Property Flipper

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

12:49 PM, 9th August 2024, About 3 months ago

Reply to the comment left by Sheralyne Stamp at 09/08/2024 - 11:38
How about investing in businesses that help large property companies deliver on their ambitions, consultants, construction firms etc.

Buy up commercial units and convert to residential.

Look for apartment hotels.

There are loads of businesses opportunities that spring out of change. Better to be looking out for them than raging against the machine.

David Lawrenson

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

13:01 PM, 9th August 2024, About 3 months ago

Reply to the comment left by Property Flipper at 09/08/2024 - 12:49
Always a strong and enduring demand as migrant accommodation, it would appear?

PH

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

13:01 PM, 9th August 2024, About 3 months ago

Reply to the comment left by Frank Jennings at 09/08/2024 - 12:31
It may be too late by then as I reckon this government will make it very difficult to sell . They don't want the responsibility of tenants .

Omar Kouch

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

7:33 AM, 10th August 2024, About 3 months ago

Reply to the comment left by Frank Jennings at 09/08/2024 - 12:31
Everyone should listen to this.
Not to negate this thread, but we must open our eyes to what their long term goal is. No matter what 'political party' is selected to be in power, they all have the same end goal. This should be clear as the main issues that were being pushed by the Tories as are plainly being pushed by the current Labour gang.
Absolutely people should look at bullion (silver as well as gold) as future investment. Buy it, hold it, and keep holding onto it. There is a reason for all the 'cash for gold' adverts and shops we have witnessed over the years.
At the same time, we must be astute in our current approach as threat of legislation often makes people play their cards early. It's important to be discerning and maximise the longevity of our current rental investments without giving in to easily.

Phil T

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

7:37 AM, 10th August 2024, About 3 months ago

I'm starting to belive the attack on landlords is about taking property back from private individuals and putting it back into the hands of the superwealthy, banks and wealthy owned corporations.
Why else would so many rules be made to deliberate force private landlords out of the market.
If you are a private landlord with a mortgage, rental is no longer viable. There are far safer and much less stressful ways to make return.
The only thing I'm surprised about is why so many landlords still haven't sold up while they are still allowed to.

Phil T

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

7:41 AM, 10th August 2024, About 3 months ago

Reply to the comment left by Frank Jennings at 09/08/2024 - 12:31
Id sell it now while you still can, you might not be able to I a years time

Dennis Forrest

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

8:20 AM, 10th August 2024, About 3 months ago

Reply to the comment left by PH at 08/08/2024 - 10:09
Longer term there is little risk with shares if you have them in a well constructed portfolio. Stick to a spread of FTSE 350 shares where risk of total loss is rare but can happen e.g. Debenhams. As an addition or an alternative you can also buy investment trusts which are similar to unit trusts having a spread of different shares but they are bought and sold on the stock market. They can never be forced sellers of their holdings unlike unit trusts. I have had a few shares which have lost my money completely but I have many more shares that have more than doubled in value. I would advise anyone to invest only via an ISA. Taxes on dividends are high otherwise. My ISA has increased over the years and I have recently stopped re-investing the dividends. I am currently get tax free dividend payouts of just over £50,000 per annum.

Leave Comments

In order to post comments you will need to Sign In or Sign Up for a FREE Membership

or

Don't have an account? Sign Up

Landlord Automated Assistant Read More