10:47 AM, 25th July 2018, About 6 years ago 71
Text Size
Fergus Wilson, a Kent portfolio landlord has made the headlines recently for the wrong reasons. Mr Wilson has stated that he will start evicting tenants with children under 5. Horrible headlines indeed. Exactly the type of landlord that should not inhabit the PRS, or maybe not?
Mr Wilson has now explained that his Local Council has demanded, that where properties are rented to tenants whose children are under 5yrs old, boilers must be fixed within 24 hours. Excellent in theory, but what if a plumber is not available ? What if a plumber lets a landlord down? What if a part for a boiler is not available and must be ordered? What if a boiler fails and a new unit must be installed?
In these scenarios, a landlord may not be able to repair within 24 hours and thus he would be in breach of the onerous conditions foisted upon him by the Council zealots. The landlord then becomes a criminal, as per these horrific local authorities.
Mr Wilson, in order to avoid becoming a criminal, must regretfully evict his tenants, who by all accounts have been excellent tenants. The landlord loses rent, the tenant loses their home. What sheer stupidity, but who can blame Mr Wilson? I certainly would not, and lets call a spade a spade. This disgraceful episode is down to the council.
Moving on, the Government, as we know, has introduced min bedroom sizes. Meanwhile, there is the new phenomenon, especially in London, where working adults on the ‘minimum wage’ cannot afford housing. Surely it would be better to allow these smaller rooms to be let? Instead we have these potential tenants sleeping in shelters, if they are lucky, or on the streets if they are unlucky.
The zealots, however, feel it is preferable to take these badly needed rooms out of the market. It seems they think it is safer to sleep outside in the elements. The stupidity is mind blowing. Day by day the PRS is under attack.
Councils everywhere are on the bandwagon, sucking cash from landlords with their sham schemes, under the guise of improving the lot of tenants. Even the landlords ability to evict under Section 21 of the Housing Act is under threat!
Wake up landlords and smell the coffee!
If in doubt, issue your Section 21 notices now, and rid yourselves of high risk problems before your tenants acquire indefinite leave to remain in your property. If at all possible, cease taking benefit tenants. Hand these problems back to Government and Councils.
If you do sell up, consider investing your hard earned cash in foreign property or foreign equities. Do your research. Take your investment where it is appreciated.
Only when the PRS is smashed will the powers that be wake up. In the meantime, prepare for 3 year tenancies, and possibly rent controls. This will restrict mobility as accommodation will become scarce.
There seems to be an agenda here, and that is that the Government wants rid of small individual landlords in favour of portfolio landlords.
It is time to fight back!
No benefit tenants, argue every step of the way on licensing. We may not be able to stop it, but we can certainly make life difficult for Councils. Hold them to account on every detail. Film inspections, get tenants onside and give them hell. The alternative is to surrender and lose your business.
Go hard or go home.
Landlords, stop whinging and fight back!
Larry Sweeney
Previous Article
Property sales down 8.8% from last year
RH
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up16:06 PM, 31st July 2018, About 6 years ago
Reply to the comment left by Luke P at 28/07/2018 - 16:37
Comments like this is why the PRS is in such a mess. You are a website...a good website...but nothing more.
Neil Patterson
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up16:22 PM, 31st July 2018, About 6 years ago
Please see our win against the West Brom. No other Body has achieved anything remotely comparable for landlords.
TheMaluka
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up16:47 PM, 31st July 2018, About 6 years ago
Reply to the comment left by RH at 31/07/2018 - 16:06
Check your facts, Luke P is correct.
Mark Alexander - Founder of Property118
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up16:57 PM, 31st July 2018, About 6 years ago
Reply to the comment left by RH at 31/07/2018 - 16:06
I met Luke P once at an exhibition in London. I’m quite certain he was a person, and I know for a fact he was not a website
TheMaluka
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up17:02 PM, 31st July 2018, About 6 years ago
Reply to the comment left by Mark Alexander at 31/07/2018 - 16:57
I rather assumed that RH was referring to the 118 website, perhaps I was wrong?
Luke P
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up17:28 PM, 31st July 2018, About 6 years ago
Reply to the comment left by David Price at 31/07/2018 - 17:02
I. Am. Not. A. Website. [said in a rubbish robot voice] 🤖
Whiteskifreak Surrey
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up7:45 AM, 1st August 2018, About 6 years ago
Reply to the comment left by David Price at 31/07/2018 - 17:02
My understanding was exactly like yours, David. RH seems to be talking about this website, Property 118.
Luke P
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up8:37 AM, 1st August 2018, About 6 years ago
Reply to the comment left by Whiteskifreak Surrey at 01/08/2018 - 07:45
I knew what RH meant, but is still incorrect.
Neil Patterson
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up10:10 AM, 1st August 2018, About 6 years ago
Update from Fergus Wilson:
The final position is that I met with a Group of Ashford Landlords over the weekend and the summary is as follows:-
1) Landlords, Council Officers, reporters have to understand the difference between a Plumber and a Gas Safety engineer.
2) A normal “jobbing” plumber is not allowed to touch the Boiler. It is only a Gas Safety Engineer that can touch a boiler.
3) The Council recognises the difficulties in getting hold of an available Gas Safety Engineer. It has a mechanism to assist in locating a Gas Safety Engineer.
4) However, that mechanism is difficult to access during holiday time!
5) A Landlord is “On Duty” as soon as he is notified. He is responsible from that point. If the Agent is notified then the Landlord is vicariously responsible of the Agent.
6) It was compared to the NHS Service, Just because you need a GP does not mean you can access one. Just because you need a Brain Surgeon does not mean you can access one and there are long queues.
7) Everyone is entitled to the repair to be done immediately! However, the Council seeks to teach a lesson if the Landlord does not deal with the matter immediately where young children are concerned. (Under 5). That you cannot access a Gas Safety engineer is no excuse.
8) Independent Gas Safety Engineers must be used and not direct employees.
9) One Kent Council in response to a FOI request admitted that 11% of its Council Stock did not have a current Gas Safety Certificate.
10) A PSL would be prosecuted if he did not have a current Gas Safety Certificate.
11) The long term requirement is for a National Training Programme to increase the number of Gas Safety Engineers but we as landlords, at the coal face, have to deal with the immediate shortage.
Mick Roberts
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up10:36 AM, 1st August 2018, About 6 years ago
That's interesting statistics.
11% don't have one.
As u know, some of us HB landlords struggle to get in with tenants not answering phone, changing number etc.
But who's to blame? We are.
With no accountability on the actual person causing the problem in first place.
And the more the Govt allows em to blame someone else, the more they will think F__k the Landlord then.
Just as I've been doing my tenants HB claims for 20 years. Now I wish to slow down, they say Oh you've always done it for us Mick. I thought you'd be making sure rent is paid as we're going Skeggy for the week.