0:01 AM, 8th September 2023, About A year ago 11
Text Size
Many people think that being a landlord in the private rented sector (PRS) is easy money. They assume that all you have to do is buy a property, find a tenant and collect the rent every month. They think that landlords are greedy, exploiting tenants and contributing to the housing crisis.
Unfortunately, they also listen to organisations like Shelter and Crisis, who claim that landlords are responsible for the poor conditions, insecurity and unaffordability in the PRS.
But this is far from the truth.
Being a landlord is not easy money. It is hard work, risky and stressful.
And, if it really was that easy, then why doesn’t Shelter offer homes to those who it continually carps are ‘facing homelessness’? Let’s look at some of the reasons why everyone wants to have a go at landlords providing a home and why they don’t want to provide homes instead of finger pointing.
Landlords must deal with many challenges and responsibilities that are often overlooked or ignored by our critics.
So, to tenants and those who judge us, here are some of the reasons why being a landlord is not easy money:
Just to highlight the financial penalties that landlords face are steep to the point of bankruptcy. Not registered as an HMO in a selective licensing area? That’s up to £30,000. Not meeting every regulation? That’s another £5,000 for EACH transgression.
Then add into the equation the cost of a new boiler, fixing plumbing problems or repairing the roof. All this costs money – money that landlords MUST find.
Apparently, anti-social behaviour from tenants is the responsibility of landlords. But when we try to evict for this reason, we get lambasted if we use a section 21 ‘no fault’ eviction because this is the quickest way of dealing with the issue.
Renting a property is a demanding and challenging business that requires a lot of time, money, effort and skills. It is not fair or accurate to portray landlords as villains or parasites who are exploiting tenants or causing the housing crisis.
It is also not helpful or constructive to demonise or vilify landlords or call for more regulations or restrictions that will make our lives harder or drive those who get fed up out of the market.
Instead of attacking landlords or blaming us for everything that is wrong with the PRS, organisations like Shelter should try to work with us to improve the sector. They should try to understand the challenges and difficulties that landlords face and help us overcome them.
They should try to encourage more investment and innovation in the sector that will benefit both landlords and tenants.
That’s why I think that Shelter and Crisis should put up or shut up.
Either start renting out homes to all those families you claim are being made homeless by heartless landlords, or rein in the rhetoric that all landlords are bad people.
You will soon learn that being a landlord is not a route to easy money.
We deliver a valuable and vital service that provides homes for millions of people in the UK who cannot or do not want to buy their own property.
Landlords deserve respect and recognition for our contribution and role in society.
But I doubt that will change any time soon.
And that is a shame because with the benefit of hindsight when tens of thousands of homes have left the rental sector, perhaps then you might appreciate us.
But we won’t be here for your apologies and regret – the unwarranted character assassination and the extra legislation helped to push us out.
The critics of landlords won’t bother to house people desperate for a home, that’s not the game they play, but they will have made a bed they will be forced to lie in.
I hope they enjoy it.
Until next time,
The Landlord Crusader
Next Article
Is my letting agent responsible for a poor repair?
Paul Essex
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up10:24 AM, 8th September 2023, About A year ago
Sad state of affairs but so true.
We can do nothing right; too many houses bought by landlords they insist one week, not enough houses to rent the following week.
Demands for the highest standards of accomodation, followed by a cry of the rents are too high.
Landlords must tackle anti-social behavior but want to get rid of Section 21 and are happy to pay wealthy barristers to use every trick to prevent you dealing with the problem.
Russell Cartner
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up11:25 AM, 8th September 2023, About A year ago
Excellent
but
If you want to make your point confront your Local MP by email and explain due to Government anti Landlord policies you will not be voting for him at the next election Better if you email M Gove michael.gove.mp@parliament.uk
Brilliant to wiipe the smile off his smug face when he loses his £150,000 job
Ofer Moses
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up12:00 PM, 8th September 2023, About A year ago
Reply to the comment left by Russell Cartner at 08/09/2023 - 11:25
I did confront my local Labour MP, unfortunately he is in cahoots with the likes of shelter, gen rent etc, and unsurprisingly did not even have the decency to reply!
We're on our own and at the mercy of governing bodies, so stay in or out is for every landlord to decide for themselves
Russell Cartner
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up12:42 PM, 8th September 2023, About A year ago
Reply to the comment left by Ofer Moses at 08/09/2023 - 12:00
Thats ok just email to let him know because he hasn't replied You will definitely not be voting for him.
Gove is the main man you really should email him. In fact all your family should
SimonP
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up0:09 AM, 9th September 2023, About A year ago
And when my tenant leaves in a few weeks, I shall end up having to pay 3 times what he was paying in Council Tax since an empty property is, quite obviously, a much larger drain on council services than a single-tenanted home. Right! Got it!
Mick Roberts
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up8:04 AM, 9th September 2023, About A year ago
Yes, I've said to em many a times
Please u buy it, u welcome to look after em. I'll do u 10k discount if u promise to keep em in there for 10 years at current rate.
Fergus Wilson
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up8:24 AM, 9th September 2023, About A year ago
There are easier ways of making a living!
If you take single mums on housing benefit you are taking advantage of vulnerable people!
One local council official said I was. Quite easy, stop taking people on Housing Benefit!
Then you are a nasty landlord!
Well 82% of PSLs do not take people on Housing Benefit!
If you are a Landlord you have a target on your back!
Easy rider
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up15:02 PM, 9th September 2023, About A year ago
Reply to the comment left by SimonP at 09/09/2023 - 00:09
Move in yourself. Single person discount on your main home and the rental property. Or move a student in (family member perhaps) or somebody under 18.
Teessider
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up13:22 PM, 10th September 2023, About A year ago
My properties have an average value of around £90k (2, 3, 3 and 4 bedroom properties).
Shelter’s income in 2022 was over £75million.
That would be enough money to buy 833 x houses outright in one year alone. With 75% mortgages they could buy 3,333 houses in one year alone.
Imagine how many people could have been housed by Shelter since they started their ‘charity’ in 1966 if they’d chosen to spend just half of their income on buying houses.
Of course, answering the phones to give out repetitive advice that could be provided by AI bits and advertising for more funds is far easier than being a landlord.
I bet the CEO has a nice house.
Russell Cartner
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up13:38 PM, 10th September 2023, About A year ago
Reply to the comment left by Teessider at 10/09/2023 - 13:22
I would love it if they were investigated
All you need to do us ask whether they have misaproted funds