9:17 AM, 18th July 2024, About 4 months ago 48
Text Size
Landlords have another battle on their hands with news that the Renters’ Rights Bill will pick up where the Renters (Reform) Bill failed to deliver.
Despite a 2019 manifesto pledge, the RRB was binned by the Conservatives after Rishi Sunak called a General Election.
Now Labour is promising to ‘take action where the previous government has failed’ on the protection for renters.
Below, we give details of what landlords can expect from the new legislation.
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said: “Too many people currently live with the threat of insecurity and injustice, and so we will make sure everyone can grow up in the secure housing they deserve.
“We will introduce tough new protections for renters, end no-fault evictions and raise standards to make sure homes are safe for people to live in.”
The Labour says that more than 11 million renters in England face constant anxiety because they could be evicted with little warning and for no reason.
It adds that this fear traps many tenants in poor-quality housing because they’re afraid to complain about being kicked out in retaliation.
The Labour Party says: “We value the contribution made by responsible landlords who provide quality homes to their tenants and believe they must enjoy robust grounds for possession where there is good reason to take their property back.
“However, the Government is determined to level decisively the playing field between landlord and tenant by providing renters with greater security, rights and protections and cracking down on the minority of unscrupulous landlords who exploit, mistreat or discriminate against tenants with bad practices such as unfair rent increases intended to force tenants out, and pitting renters against each other in bidding wars.”
It goes on: “The Renters’ Rights Bill delivers our manifesto commitment to transform the experience of private renting, including by ending Section 21 ‘no-fault’ evictions – we will take action where the previous government has failed.
“The Bill will give renters much greater security and stability so they can stay in their homes for longer, build lives in their communities, and avoid the risk of homelessness.”
Labour also says the PRS must provide flexibility for those who want it, and that too many renters are ‘being exploited by a minority of unscrupulous landlords’.
The government says this Bill will tackle the challenges faced by millions of private renters in England, including 1.4 million families with children and 444,000 households with over-65s.
In 2023, ‘no-fault’ evictions threatened a record 25,910 families with homelessness, while 2,682 were evicted – a worrying 19% increase in just a year.
The government also points to soaring rents which have jumped from a 2% annual growth to 9% in March.
That rise means tenants, on average, spend 38% of their income on rent, compared to 21% for homeowners and 27% for social housing tenants.
Also, one million private rented homes are considered non-decent, and more than half a million have serious health hazards like damp and mould.
To help private landlords understand what is planned under the Renters’ Rights Bill, here are the full details published by the government:
Previous Article
Propertymark urges clarity on Section 21 abolition
Carchester
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up8:25 AM, 20th July 2024, About 4 months ago
I am afraid that the King’s speech did nothing to address the levelling up that is allegedly needed and which if anything, should level up in a balanced manner for all --------so penned Ray Guselli.
Levelling Down is more appropriate.
Carchester
city boy
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up8:57 AM, 20th July 2024, About 4 months ago
Reply to the comment left by David Houghton at 18/07/2024 - 10:37
Indeed - they won’t pass affordability criteria for many properties - I won’t accept anyone with CCJs also. I won’t rent without rent protection - if the tenants don’t qualify I don’t rent to them.
Also my property insurance has a condition of working tenants.
Pets - anything leasehold has a no pet clause - so another ill thought out rule. Insurance paid for by the tenants for pets? How does that work / it’s me with the insurance interest not the tenant - how do we ensure they keep up payments? Don’t cancel the insurance and so on … so much hear has got more holes than a Swiss cheese..
Judith Wordsworth
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up10:25 AM, 20th July 2024, About 4 months ago
Reply to the comment left by David Houghton at 18/07/2024 - 10:37
Better they insist on the claimant working the allowed 18 hours pw.
Interestingly it’s 18 hours pw not on how much the pay is per hour
Judith Wordsworth
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up10:32 AM, 20th July 2024, About 4 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Cider Drinker at 18/07/2024 - 10:54
Brilliantly said.
The How Many depends if family members are also being termed renters.
Aren’t statistics easily manipulated to suit the scenario 😉
Judith Wordsworth
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up10:33 AM, 20th July 2024, About 4 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Carchester at 20/07/2024 - 08:25
I’ve been saying levelling down since levelling up was first introduced lol
Judith Wordsworth
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up10:38 AM, 20th July 2024, About 4 months ago
Reply to the comment left by JB at 18/07/2024 - 14:05Surely breaches GDPR if allowing data about a landlord?
Now where’s the Tenants register proposal with info about prospective tenants? Ahh of course not as that would breach GDPR
Judith Wordsworth
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up10:42 AM, 20th July 2024, About 4 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Darren Sullivan at 18/07/2024 - 15:16
No need for any debate to remove s21. A Statutory Instrument can amend any primary legislation in 24 hours or even immediately in an emergency.
Labour is already falling down on their manifesto and PR promises. But then nothing in a manifesto has actually be carried through.
Manifestos are a PR exercise to win votes
Judith Wordsworth
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up10:49 AM, 20th July 2024, About 4 months ago
Reply to the comment left by jane macswayne at 18/07/2024 - 16:01
Your gas safety engineer will have a copy.
Beaver
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up10:37 AM, 22nd July 2024, About 4 months ago
So if this is what they have committed to:
"The Labour Party says: “We value the contribution made by responsible landlords who provide quality homes to their tenants and believe they must enjoy robust grounds for possession where there is good reason to take their property back."
Then let's hope that collectively they understand that they need to tone Angela Rayner down and if whatever they end up with is so extreme that like the extreme SNP policies in Scotland they would make the situation worse, the House of Lords tones it down for them.
If you need to sell your home or move back in then you need to be able to get your property back. If you can't then many people thinking about renting their homes now won't be able to do it; and many people currently renting their homes out won't be able to run the risk of doing it, so they'll have to evict before the new laws take effect. If they make a mess and apply badly conceived laws retrospectively many landlords would have to go to court and fight to get their properties back to avoid financial devastation. Bad laws would tie the courts up for years.
Ian Narbeth
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up10:56 AM, 22nd July 2024, About 4 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Beaver at 22/07/2024 - 10:37"The Labour Party says: “We value the contribution made by responsible landlords who provide quality homes to their tenants and believe they must enjoy robust grounds for possession where there is good reason to take their property back."
Being a responsible landlord and having "robust grounds for possession" is little help if the tenant stops paying rent and (a) it takes 6 to 12 months to get to court and (b) many weeks after that to get the tenant out.
As I have warned on this platform about the Renters Reform Bill - and I urge people to take note and to tell other landlords - the new Renters Rights Bill is likely to contain the same nasty trap for landlords: Claims for rent arrears will be thrown out if the landlord has not served Prescribed Information and protected the deposit correctly.
Contrast that with the situation now where that only applies to s21 claims. Unless you are very experienced, I recommend taking professional advice before serving a s8 notice.