Housing: The Key Battleground in the Upcoming Election

Housing: The Key Battleground in the Upcoming Election

by Adam Lawrence

Guest Author

11:25 AM, 24th June 2024, About 6 days ago 34

Text Size

As we edge closer to the next general election, housing has become a pivotal issue in the political arena – beyond our usual daily bubbles. The housing crisis, affecting millions across the country, is set to be a significant talking point, with each party vying to present the most compelling solutions (of course). Do you believe any of them?

The Labour Party’s Vision

Labour has pledged a transformative approach to tackle the housing crisis head-on. Their proposal centres around a massive house-building program aimed at delivering affordable homes at an unprecedented scale. By promising to construct 150,000 social homes annually, Labour seeks to address the dire shortage in the rental sector, which has been plagued by skyrocketing rents and limited availability. Spoiler alert – what they are suggesting is impossible – certainly in the first couple of years – and exceedingly difficult and expensive in the second half of what looks like their first term for nearly 15 years.

Additionally, Labour’s plans include implementing stronger rent controls and enhancing tenants’ rights. By abolishing Section 21 ‘no-fault’ evictions, they aim to provide renters with greater security and stability, a move that has garnered significant support from tenant advocacy groups. However, these proposals have gone down like a lead balloon among landlords. One argument is that stricter regulations will deter investment in the rental market. The interest rate has already done an incredible amount of heavy lifting in that department.

The Conservative Party’s Response

In response, the Conservative Party has put forward its own set of ambitious housing policies. Their focus is on homeownership, with a promise to help more people climb the property ladder. The Conservatives propose extending the Right to Buy scheme to housing association tenants, allowing them to purchase their homes at a discount – bridging the gap so “no-one” (read – everyone) is out of pocket.

Moreover, the party aims to simplify the planning process to expedite the construction of new homes. By cutting red tape and incentivizing developers, they hope to boost the supply of housing and make homeownership more attainable for first-time buyers. Critics, however, argue that these measures may not go far enough to address the root causes of the housing crisis, particularly the lack of affordable rental properties.

A Cross-Party Consensus?

Despite their differing approaches, there is a growing recognition among all parties that urgent action is needed to address the housing crisis. Both Labour and the Conservatives acknowledge the importance of increasing housing supply, though they differ on the methods to achieve this goal.

The Liberal Democrats and the Green Party also contribute to the housing debate, advocating for environmentally sustainable developments and greater support for local communities in housing decisions. Their emphasis on sustainability and community involvement highlights the multifaceted nature of the housing issue, which requires a comprehensive and collaborative approach. In the real world, we dream of cross-party consensus!

Reform

Not in the sector – per se – but the party. The only one really appealing to landlords, moving skilfully into the space left wide open over the past 9 years after the “legendary” 2015 Gideon Osborne budget. The hostile environment, revisited.

So simple – but of course moving into that space only works for Reform. It wouldn’t be congruent with anyone else’s ideology. A friend put it so eloquently this week (the sort of friend who you would describe as Tory, through and through):

“Have you read the Reform manifesto?

Not much to dislike in there!!

Ok it’s all unfunded and they are horrid racists but you can’t have everything.

I genuinely think I’m going to have to vote for them. My first ever time not ticking the blue box. Sniff.”

We aren’t in the same place – but it is fair to say we share some common ground in that quote.

I feel very conflicted over the Reform “contract”. Some parts – frankly – are completely correct. Other parts are extremely naive, particularly economically, which has me very worried.

The Electoral Implications

As housing becomes a central issue in the election campaign, voters will closely scrutinize each party’s proposals. The electorate’s decision will be influenced not only by the feasibility of these plans but also by their potential impact on everyday lives. With housing affordability at the forefront of public concern, the party that presents the most viable and appealing solutions is likely to gain significant traction. The chief issue is that none of these solutions are really viable, and we will have 5 more years of hurt coming our way. It will take a genuine miracle – that miracle being genuine political will to make a difference in housing.

In conclusion, the upcoming election will see housing as a crucial battleground, with parties striving to convince voters that they hold the key to solving the housing crisis. As we approach the election, it will be fascinating to see how these proposals evolve and how they resonate with the public. One thing is clear: housing will play a decisive role in shaping the political landscape in the days, weeks and months to come.


Share This Article


Comments

JB

15:25 PM, 24th June 2024, About 6 days ago

Reply to the comment left by Adam Lawrence at 24/06/2024 - 14:08
Its not PR spin

Adam Lawrence

15:28 PM, 24th June 2024, About 6 days ago

Reply to the comment left by JB at 24/06/2024 - 15:25
I'm just not willing to believe that "it's different this time" and "these are the ones telling the truth", I'm afraid - it's politics!

Cider Drinker

17:01 PM, 24th June 2024, About 6 days ago

Reply to the comment left by Adam Lawrence at 24/06/2024 - 14:10
The government should choose who migrates to the U.K.

Genuine asylum seekers should apply for asylum at the first safe country.

The remainder are not genuine asylum seekers,

Adam Lawrence

9:49 AM, 26th June 2024, About 4 days ago

Reply to the comment left by Cider Drinker at 24/06/2024 - 17:01
Don't directly disagree - but that's a very small fraction of the net migration numbers of the past couple of years.

The unspoken part is that too much of the public services are built on migrant labour, the Tories put in a scheme to make their pals some money to get around minimum wages by important labour, and Covid rocked the world and has changed the willingness of people in the UK to work.

All of those need addressing.

JB

10:12 AM, 26th June 2024, About 4 days ago

Reply to the comment left by Adam Lawrence at 26/06/2024 - 09:49
Reform want to increase the threshold at which you say tax to £20,000 to help people get off benefits

Adam Lawrence

14:45 PM, 27th June 2024, About 3 days ago

Reply to the comment left by JB at 26/06/2024 - 10:12
In theory I'm in support

In practice it is incredibly expensive and they are making up numbers as they go along, unfortunately.

JB

15:18 PM, 27th June 2024, About 3 days ago

Reply to the comment left by Adam Lawrence at 27/06/2024 - 14:45
There're not alone there then. Labour are not PLANNING any new taxes... and they're going to pay for everything by 'growing the economy' without saying how that little miracle will be performed. Ha Ha! we're about to be taxed into oblivian - at least those that haven't already left the country

Adam Lawrence

15:19 PM, 27th June 2024, About 3 days ago

Reply to the comment left by JB at 27/06/2024 - 15:18
Labour are lying about it and the "reason" - read excuse - for the hikes will come in time.

Cons can't afford their plans.

Reform aren't alone but they are the furthest out, but it isn't stopping the wind in their sails. Putin sympathy, however, is a bad look.

Farage isn't Trump (yet).

JB

15:28 PM, 27th June 2024, About 3 days ago

Reply to the comment left by Adam Lawrence at 27/06/2024 - 15:19
I agree, Putin sympathy is a bad look. If you mean Farage is a Putin sympahtiser then you are wrong - all he did was warn the EU that if they continued with their plans it would give Putin an excuse to invade. He was right - look what happened!
MSM mis-reporting again!

Adam Lawrence

17:19 PM, 27th June 2024, About 3 days ago

Reply to the comment left by JB at 27/06/2024 - 15:28
Not really.

Farage said "Reason" to invade. Putin had "reason" to invade.

He SHOULD have said "excuse" to invade. Because that would me a much fairer framing of the situation.

Those were his words - I don't worry about MSM, but I go to the horse's mouth. You need to say what you mean, but ensure that if you do get a reputation for saying what you mean, then say what you mean. Don't say reason if you mean excuse. etc.

Reason = sympathy.

If you will defend him at all costs, and say he can do no wrong, then that is your position and you are welcome to it - I will stick to the facts!

Farage simply imported Trump's position and didn't think about it too hard, but ultimately that is a position that sits badly with 98% of the public (Russia sympathy) as polled.

Leave Comments

In order to post comments you will need to Sign In or Sign Up for a FREE Membership

or

Don't have an account? Sign Up

Landlord Tax Planning Book Now