8:55 AM, 17th June 2024, About 6 months ago 11
Text Size
One of the most common questions landlords ask is how to give notice to end a tenancy. To address this, I’ve crafted this article to explore the various scenarios under which a standard Assured Shorthold Tenancy (AST) may be terminated and to outline the correct processes for each situation.
Throughout this article, we will assume the tenancy is a standard Assured Shorthold Tenancy (AST).
A common misconception is that tenants must give notice to end a tenancy. However, if a tenant plans to vacate on the last day of their fixed-term agreement, they are not legally required to give notice. While it is helpful for management purposes if they do, tenants cannot be expected to pay an additional month’s rent if they don’t provide notice.
When the fixed term of an AST ends, the tenancy can become either a statutory or contractual periodic tenancy. It’s crucial to know which type you have, as the rules differ:
Sometimes, tenants may need to leave before the fixed term ends. While landlords are not obligated to agree to early termination, it’s often beneficial to cooperate to minimize losses and avoid void periods. Any costs associated with early termination must comply with the Tenant Fees Act 2019, which allows landlords to charge:
Prohibited fees, such as check-out and check-in charges, must not be applied. It’s advisable to have the tenant sign a deed of surrender that outlines the agreed termination terms and costs. The security deposit will be handled as usual upon the tenant’s departure.
Many tenancy agreements include break clauses that allow either party to terminate the tenancy early with specific notice. However, the wording of break clauses can vary, and some may be poorly constructed, leading to ambiguity. It is important to thoroughly understand your AST’s requirements regarding the break clause. Note that you cannot charge a tenant for vacating early if they are exercising a break clause.
As a landlord, you can end a tenancy in two primary ways:
Ending a tenancy can be complex, requiring careful consideration of legal and ethical factors. Both landlords and tenants should understand their rights and responsibilities. Clear communication, proper documentation, and adherence to legal protocols are essential for a smooth and fair transition. By following these guidelines, landlords and tenants can navigate the end of a tenancy with confidence.
With over 30 years of extensive 360° experience in the Private Rented Sector, Julie Ford brings a wealth of knowledge and expertise to the table. Her career has encompassed roles from Housing Law Caseworker at a national solicitor firm to Head of Property and Asset Management in the City. She has had the privilege of managing properties for high-profile clients, including premiership footballers, actors, and A-list comedians.
Julie successfully founded and ran a Lettings and Property Management company, building an impressive portfolio of over 500 single-let properties. After selling the business, she transitioned to the third sector, providing specialist housing and homelessness law advice for Citizens Advice and working with a local homeless charity to optimize their mixed property portfolio and lease options.
Currently, Julie serves as a board member on the Zoopla Lettings Advisory Board and acts as a judge for several industry award ceremonies. She is also a frequent property commentator in the media. In addition, she is a qualified property and civil mediator with over 600 mediations to her credit, and a registered expert witness for the courts.
Previous Article
iHowz manifesto: rent-free proposal and tax fairness for landlordsNext Article
Labour abolishing Section 21 from day one?
JB
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up11:33 AM, 17th June 2024, About 6 months ago
This will soon be irrelevant. If the tenant doesn't leave before 5th July, they may not conclude if Red Angela pulls them retrospectively.
However, I, like many others have served some and will be serving more.
Julie Ford
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up11:43 AM, 17th June 2024, About 6 months ago
Hi JB, if Labour do get into power they will not be able to abolish s21 with immediate effect as they are claiming.
All legislation has a process that needs to be followed before it becomes law
It must pass through both Houses and receive Royal Ascent, this won’t happen in 1 day
Now, we saw during covid how quickly laws can be passed, but that’s when all parties and houses agree and have no amendments
Abolishing s21 is not as simple as just issuing a ban and that’s that.
It has a knock on effect which will need consideration
JB
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up15:13 PM, 17th June 2024, About 6 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Julie Ford at 17/06/2024 - 11:43
Well that good news! There will be lots of landlords issuing section 21's in the coming weeks. Lets hope possession can be obtained where required
PH
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up15:21 PM, 17th June 2024, About 6 months ago
When S21 is abolished where do we stand regarding selling a property if there are no amendments in S8 ?
Mark Alexander - Founder of Property118
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up16:04 PM, 17th June 2024, About 6 months ago
Reply to the comment left by PH at 17/06/2024 - 15:21
Surely that would be speculation at this point?
Julie Ford
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up16:17 PM, 17th June 2024, About 6 months ago
Reply to the comment left by PH at 17/06/2024 - 15:21
That is one of the reasons why an immediate ban of s21 wouldn’t be legally possible, because landlords would need to be able to regain possession for reasons other than the tenant breaching the tenancy.
In the now defunked Renters Reform Bill we did see additional s8 grounds allowing the landlord to sell or move back in.
It would be anticipated that Civil servants who write the Bills will bring these concerns forward.
There is a small possibility that if Labour get in they could issue a monetorium on issuing section 21 as secondary legislation, similar to what we saw during covid, but this can only be temporary
peter kessler
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up16:28 PM, 17th June 2024, About 6 months ago
Attn. Julie Ford.
Further to your article today, I would advise that I am in the process of trying to evict two separate tenant rentals based in the Newham area. I have Possesion Orders on both.
According to the tenants, they have been advised by Newham Housing to remain in the flats pending arrival of Bailiffs and if they choose to leave earlier they will be deemed to have made themselves Homeless and miss out on alternative house placements.
I am contemplating litigation against Newham for loss of anticipated income. Do you have statistical records of similar actions by Newham and indeed other Councils to facilitate the Legal Action?
Rob Crawford
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up17:16 PM, 17th June 2024, About 6 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Julie Ford at 17/06/2024 - 11:43
Agreed, and it makes a mockery of Labour's intent to "immediately" abolish section 21. How does this reflect on labour's other manifesto intent!
Julie Ford
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up8:03 AM, 18th June 2024, About 6 months ago
Reply to the comment left by peter kessler at 17/06/2024 - 16:28HI Peter, This is an all too common situation i am afraid. Local councils across the Country are telling tenants the same. This advice actually goes against the Homeless Code of Guidance which states “Housing authorities should not consider it reasonable for an applicant to remain in occupation until eviction by a bailiff.”
Former Housing Minister Branden Lewis also wrote an open letter to all councils informing them this practice goes against legislation and guidance, but sadly they didn't seem to listen. I do not have statistics for specific councils, but you will certainly be in a positive position to take legal action. I would recommend seeking specialist legal advice rather than using a high street solicitor for this. You may also be interested in an article from March 2023 https://www.property118.com/are-councils-acting-illegally-when-telling-tenants-to-stay-put/ I hope this works out for you and id be interested in the outcome.
moneymanager
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up18:06 PM, 18th June 2024, About 6 months ago
'S21 issued to end a tenancy without fault'?
I may be a hair splitting pedant but my non legally trained mind has a problem with that commonly broadcast, deployed, notion. My understanding is that only two people can end a tenancy, a tenant by leaving or a judge ordering them to do so, the SOLE purpose of serving a S21 notice is not a notice to leave, there is no power of a landlord to do that, but to bring to the renant's awarened that their contractual tenancy (not the housing tenancy) is coming to an end AND THAT there may be recourse to legal process if they neither agree renewal terms or meet their contractual obligations by vacating, please correct me if I'm wrong.