16:45 PM, 23rd September 2024, About 2 months ago 92
Text Size
Ed Miliband is willing to risk a fight with landlords to meet EPC C targets, according to The Times.
In a speech at the Labour party conference, Ed Miliband says landlords must provide decent standards for private rented homes including reaching EPC C targets by 2030.
The Department for Energy Security and Net Zero has announced that it will soon hold a consultation on proposals aimed at helping landlords meet EPC C targets for private and social rented homes.
The energy secretary told the Labour party conference: “We all know that the poorest people in our country often live in cold, draughty homes, many rent from private landlords whose properties are below decent standards.
“That is a Tory legacy and scandal. This government will not tolerate this injustice and we will end it. Decent energy standards for private rented homes that will mean warmer homes and lower bills for renters.”
The Department for Energy Security and Net Zero has now confirmed, a consultation is expected later this year, which is expected to include a cap on the amount landlords will have to spend on energy-efficiency upgrades.
This was set at £10,000 under previous plans by the Conservative government and Mr Miliband is expected to stick with a similar figure.
The government has also announced a new Warm Homes: Local Grant to help low-income homeowners and private tenants with energy performance upgrades and cleaner heating, and confirmed the continuation of the Public Sector Decarbonisation Scheme, as well as the Warm Homes: Social Housing Fund, which replaces the Social Housing Decarbonisation Fund, to support social housing providers and tenants.
The Times reports Labour sources are willing to risk a battle with landlords to reach their green goals.
Chris Norris, policy director for the National Residential Landlords Association (NRLA) says more detail is needed on how the government will help landlords meet energy-efficiency targets.
He said: “The NRLA wants to see all rented properties become as energy efficient as possible. However, the government’s approach must involve a clear and comprehensive plan which recognises that the sector has some of the oldest, and hardest to improve, properties in the UK’s housing stock.
“The sector needs a clear trajectory setting out what will be expected of it and by when. This plan must also ensure sufficient numbers of tradespeople are in place to undertake the work that will be required.
“Alongside this, as the Committee on Fuel Poverty has warned, is the need for a financial package to support investment in energy efficiency measures. At present, the private rented sector is the only housing tenure without a bespoke package to support work to upgrade homes.”
Reacting to the news, Ben Twomey, chief executive of Generation Rent, said “The commitment to raise minimum energy efficiency standards in privately rented homes to EPC Band C is welcome, but must happen as soon as possible. This is a no-brainer to lift tenants out of poverty, improve our health, and address climate change all at once. One in four private renters live in fuel poverty, and we cannot face another six winters in cold homes.
“Any consultation must keep tenant concerns at the centre of this change, and home improvements should be paid for in grants that already exist for households at risk of fuel poverty. Renters must be protected from eviction and exploitation when grants received in our name improve the value of our landlords’ assets, while the government needs to be prepared to get tough with non-compliant landlords.”
A spokesperson for the Country Land and Business Association (CLA) said: “For many rural homes, often historic or off the grid, these targets range from unrealistic to physically unachievable.
“Landlords could be forced to spend £10,000 with no guarantee of improving energy efficiency, but the real burden will fall on rural communities.
“While we agree that practical solutions to help make homes warmer are to be encouraged, the proposed approach is blunt, regressive and will not work.
“Our recent findings show that concerns around changes to energy efficiency standards are driving landlords to sell or repurpose properties, worsening the rural housing crisis. We need to cut emissions, but the government must work with landlords on realistic solutions.”
Beaver
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up15:35 PM, 2nd October 2024, About 2 months ago
Reply to the comment left by GlanACC at 28/09/2024 - 09:36
Apparently Red Ed is going to give landlords grants of up to £15K but only if they rent to low income tenants.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/property/landlords-handed-15000-epc-grants-low-income-tenants/#:~:text=%2F%20Property-,Landlords%20handed%20%C2%A315k%20%E2%80%93%20but%20only%20if,let%20to%20low%2Dincome%20tenants&text=Landlords%20will%20be%20handed%20grants,let%20to%20low%2Dincome%20tenants.
I'm not going to be costing Ed much because low income tenants wouldn't be able to afford my property.
TheMaluka
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up15:43 PM, 2nd October 2024, About 2 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Beaver at 02/10/2024 - 15:35
Nor mine.
Beaver
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up15:47 PM, 2nd October 2024, About 2 months ago
Reply to the comment left by TheMaluka at 02/10/2024 - 15:43
It seems to me that they could make more of a difference if they made improvements tax deductible (currently improvements are capital expenditure so you've got to finance them and can't deduct the cost).
I can't see this making any difference. So is this response to climate change just more hot air from Ed? Or am I being too cynical? Does anyone on here have any experience of getting grants for low-income tenants and was it worth it?
Ryan Stevens
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up15:53 PM, 2nd October 2024, About 2 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Beaver at 02/10/2024 - 15:47
There should be a way to divert all the hot air in parliament to the homes of the poor, cuddly tenants.
GlanACC
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up16:29 PM, 2nd October 2024, About 2 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Beaver at 02/10/2024 - 15:35
I have already had 2 properties upgraded on the EC04 scheme. Tried with another tenant who was earning less than £31k but property was EPC D so was rejected. With the new scheme that property might be accepted. Also might get my other D property reassessed as it was done so long ago it might be an E now, so here's hoping
Beaver
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up16:32 PM, 2nd October 2024, About 2 months ago
Reply to the comment left by GlanACC at 02/10/2024 - 16:29Sorry...that appears to say that the property that was EPC D was rejected because it was EPC D. Was that really what you meant?
GARY RIVETT
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up16:42 PM, 2nd October 2024, About 2 months ago
Reply to the comment left by GlanACC at 02/10/2024 - 16:29
Good luck with that, I too have had 6 properties upgraded with the EC04 scheme, however, due to 2 of the property's tenants not being on DWP benefits, they remain lower than a C, but I am well chuffed that I got the grants. This has saved me loads, it also saved the tenants their homes, as I would have had to evict them due to the cost.
So, I am grateful to whoever initiated this scheme, which has allowed me to keep these tenants in their homes, of course, I have not and will not raise their rents because of these upgrades, in fact, I will ensure that they can live in these homes as long as they keep to their contracts which I am sure that they will.
Beaver
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up16:45 PM, 2nd October 2024, About 2 months ago
Reply to the comment left by GARY RIVETT at 02/10/2024 - 16:42
OK then. It seems that I was being too cynical and whilst there's no way my tenants will benefit from Red Ed's new scheme it appears that somebody else may do.
GARY RIVETT
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up16:49 PM, 2nd October 2024, About 2 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Beaver at 02/10/2024 - 16:45
Beaver, I don't think that you were being too cynical. I believe that the EP04 scheme was brought in well before Red Ed's and co's reign began. I started my improvements campaign before the election and was just trying to mitigate the disastrous impact that the socialists were going to have on our business.
Beaver
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up16:53 PM, 2nd October 2024, About 2 months ago
Reply to the comment left by GARY RIVETT at 02/10/2024 - 16:49
I would have done the same if I could but in reality my tenants are not low income tenants and they would not qualify. Making energy efficiency/performance improvements tax deductible might make a difference but in reality I would be expecting to raise rent for an improved property.