I don’t think I need to be concerned about GDPR

I don’t think I need to be concerned about GDPR

12:38 PM, 5th May 2018, About 7 years ago 104

Text Size

I don’t think I need to be concerned about GDPR, here’s why.

I live overseas and whilst my property rental business in the UK is a substantial one, I keep no records either written or electronically in regards to any of my tenants. The day to day liaison with tenants is all dealt with via my letting agent, who simply accounts to me the rental income for my properties.

Occasionally, if for example I need to replace white goods, then my letting agent will provide me with the contact details of my tenants to organise this. That is the only purpose for which I use that tenants data and it is then destroyed.

On this basis, do you agree that I should not concern myself with GDPR?


Share This Article


Comments

Hamish McBloggs

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

10:01 AM, 24th July 2018, About 6 years ago

Reply to the comment left by Mike at 23/07/2018 - 18:17The response Companies House stated that if I believe that I am at personal risk then I can apply to have personal information removed. If the application is successful then it's £55 per document.
'Only documents registered with us on or after 1 January 2003 can be amended'
I was a victim if ID fraud 2 years ago. Transcription errors made by Companies House themselves meant I had the wrong DOB. This is how I know the data dame from CHS. I haven't corrected their mistake.
So, let's play 'Hunt the signature'. Double points for a personal address. A game that can be played from any internet café in any country outside UK law.
'I am sorry to send a disappointing reply, but hope I have clarified the registrar's position and the legal framework within which we must operate'
I call it controlled flight into terrain.
Hamish

Ian Narbeth

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

11:15 AM, 24th July 2018, About 6 years ago

Reply to the comment left by Mike at 23/07/2018 - 18:17
Mike
The publicity of a company's affairs is a quid pro quo for limited liability. It was not such an issue in the past but is becoming so now. There is an interesting discussion on this blog: https://companieshouse.blog.gov.uk/2016/01/21/our-register-advice-on-protecting-your-personal-information/

Identity theft is a new phenomenon and Companies House (along with other organisations) is struggling to keep up. The ease of finding and downloading information is staggering.

Hamish McBloggs

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

20:08 PM, 24th July 2018, About 6 years ago

Reply to the comment left by Ian Narbeth at 24/07/2018 - 11:15
Ian,

I completely understand the quid quo pro.

And am familiar with that blog.

'The operation of the register is not impacted by the introduction of the GDPR. As the registrar is required by the Companies Act 2006 to make information on registered companies available to the public, she is entitled to rely on the following exemption to GDPR which is contained in paragraph 5 of Schedule 2, Part 1 of the Data Protection Act 2018'.

There's no 'consent' required.

I guess that until until someone important has a couple of masked men knock on the door late at night things won't change.

I will continue my argument with CHS by gathering the personal information of CHS people using CHS resources and writing to them to point out the issue.

Until then, every time someone opens another phone account or bank account in my name I will have to waste the time of Action Fraud. You our tax.

Oh yes, documents before 1 Jan 2003 can't be amended.

Hamish

Mike

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

12:40 PM, 19th November 2019, About 5 years ago

Data Protection is another Quango idea, waste of time and quite annoying at times , try to help someone who cannot communicate over the phone and data protection stops you right there and the poor chap who needs your help cannot be helped because any organisation now will not speak to anyone on behalf of someone who cannot speak.

reporting crime is also hindered as even of you tried to tip off an organisation they will not accept what you say due to data protection law.

What has it done for me:
1.it has cost me fees for absolutely no gain
2. My tenants or anyone I deal with don't give two monkeys if I do protect their data, if I didn't they don't give a tiny bit of hoot.
3. I tried to report a benefit cheat, but could not and was instead told that I could be prosecuted if I revealed the cheats details to anyone.
There you go ......No wonder we are going down the pan

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Leave Comments

In order to post comments you will need to Sign In or Sign Up for a FREE Membership

or

Don't have an account? Sign Up

Landlord Automated Assistant Read More