10:09 AM, 1st March 2024, About 10 months ago 83
Text Size
Council leaders from across the political spectrum have asked the housing secretary, Michael Gove, to support an amendment to the Renters (Reform) Bill that would give tenants more time to find a new home if they are evicted.
Sky News says it has obtained a letter, signed by 103 local authority leaders, including the leader of Rishi Sunak’s constituency council in North Yorkshire, that urges Mr Gove to increase eviction notice periods from two months to four.
The letter, which was co-ordinated by the campaign group Renters Reform Coalition, says that this change would ‘give tenants more security and time to find a new home which suits their needs in the event they are evicted’ and would ‘reduce the number of people claiming homelessness support following the end of a private tenancy’.
The Renters (Reform) Bill, which is currently going through Parliament will ban Section 21 ‘no-fault’ evictions which allow landlords to reclaim properties without giving a reason.
The campaign manager at the Renters’ Reform Coalition, Tom Darling, told Sky News the Bill ‘has many positive aspects – but it is still insufficient to address the scale of the crisis in the private rented sector’.
He said: “The two months being proposed, like the status quo, will leave renters frantically scrambling to find a suitable new home in time, with many ending up presenting as homeless to their local council when this search comes up empty.
“Not only will increasing notice periods provide more security for England’s 11 million private renters and alleviate some of the suffering in our housing system, it will also provide some much needed respite to local authorities buckling under the growing cost of temporary accommodation.”
However, under the Bill, landlords would only be able to evict tenants in England for specific reasons, such as selling their house or having a relative move in.
The Bill would keep a two-month notice period for these cases, which the Renters Reform Coalition argues is not enough for many people to secure alternative accommodation.
The coalition says that the end of private tenancies is the main cause of homelessness, with recent data showing that more than a quarter of eligible claims for homelessness support were made because a private tenancy had ended.
The letter states: “As you will know, Section 21 evictions are a leading cause of statutory homelessness – many renters are unable to find new accommodation in the two months available after being served an S21 eviction and end up being housed in temporary accommodation.”
The number of households living in temporary accommodation has doubled since 2012, reaching record highs, including the highest number of homeless children – more than 138,000 – since records began.
Last year, councils in England warned that spending on temporary accommodation was threatening to ‘overwhelm’ their budgets.
Analysis from the Local Government Association (LGA) last year showed that ‘at least’ £1.74bn was spent supporting 104,000 households in the year ending in March – the highest amount since records began in 1998.
And this week, London Councils warned that several London boroughs are facing bankruptcy trying to meet homelessness bills.
Previous Article
Angela Rayner: The hypocrite who needs to come cleanNext Article
Unravelling the DOTAS Controversy - so what's next?
GlanACC
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up11:19 AM, 1st March 2024, About 10 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Happy housing at 01/03/2024 - 10:52
Happy, yes as I said it could be months or even years before they pop up into visibility agin. Not the fault of the credit reference agencies as non payers know how to 'go off grid'. You can do an 'everlasting' trace that retries every week to see if they are visible again. If they pop up within 6 years you can have another go at getting the money off them. I had one non payer who dissapeared and I got a CCJ against her. She got married 4 years later to some respectable chap, but when they applied for a mortgage they were turned down as she had become 'visible again' (just by moving house wont get you out of trouble as your previous addresses are linked to any new address). So I got my money as she had to clear the CCJ. If was > 6 years the CCJ would have been removed from her file and I would have got nothing.
Happy housing
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up11:19 AM, 1st March 2024, About 10 months ago
What about fixing it up. Tenants do cause much more wear and tear to a property.
Happy housing
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up11:22 AM, 1st March 2024, About 10 months ago
Reply to the comment left by GlanACC at 01/03/2024 - 11:19
Would the council pay off the arrears of x tenant? 6 yrs is a very long time to wait.
LaLo
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up11:22 AM, 1st March 2024, About 10 months ago
Passing the buck as usual! This will increase homeless numbers as yet more LLs will sell up. Homeless numbers have increased due to many LLs that have already sold up due to the increase in costly regulations plus £30,000 to unlimited fines if you get it wrong!! Bankrupt LLs plus evicted tenants will end up sharing the same shop doorway! I call on all LLs to mail Michael Gove direct to explained your views. If you think this is bad - take a look at Labours manifesto pages 11 - 13 !!
Happy housing
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up11:24 AM, 1st March 2024, About 10 months ago
Reply to the comment left by LaLo at 01/03/2024 - 11:22
What does it say?
GlanACC
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up11:24 AM, 1st March 2024, About 10 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Happy housing at 01/03/2024 - 11:19
Interestingly, a tenant does NOT have to return a property in pristine condition - this has been proven many times by many judges. Fair wear and tear must be allowed. So scuff marks around a light switch or worn stair carpets (and other similar things) may not be recoverable from the tenant.
Happy housing
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up11:26 AM, 1st March 2024, About 10 months ago
Reply to the comment left by GlanACC at 01/03/2024 - 11:24Yes that I dont mind. But when they sub let and drain it out and then say wear n tear not the same. They just say sorry didn't know after that.
Peter Watson
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up11:26 AM, 1st March 2024, About 10 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Landlord 123 at 01/03/2024 - 10:37
Totally agree. Government judge gives date to leave. Government Council inform tenants not to leave as they will have made themselves homeless
4 months is already there!!
GlanACC
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up11:28 AM, 1st March 2024, About 10 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Happy housing at 01/03/2024 - 11:22
Happy, NO the council will pay sod all. In my case I waited 4 years and I got the money because I had the new address - and they wanted a house so they would have had to wait another 2 years for the CCJ to drop off, but I threatened to raise another CCJ as I had only asked for £300 and not the full amount of rent arrears
LaLo
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up11:34 AM, 1st March 2024, About 10 months ago
Reply to the comment left by GlanACC at 01/03/2024 - 10:38That’s a very good point but I feel that there’s no national tenant register for a reason - it would creat yet more homeless!