Corbyn – Government “in the pockets of Rogue Landlords”

Corbyn – Government “in the pockets of Rogue Landlords”

10:30 AM, 30th January 2018, About 7 years ago 36

Text Size

Jeremy Corbyn was responding to a Guardian article “Hundreds of thousands living in squalid rented homes in England” when he accused the government of being unwilling to fix the housing crisis because they were “in the pockets of rogue landlords.”

Corbyn said: “The squalid and unsafe conditions that hundreds of thousands of people face are at crisis level. The broken housing market is in urgent need of a complete overhaul. The Conservatives can’t fix the housing crisis because they’re in the pockets of property speculators and rogue landlords, not on the side of tenants.”

By property speculators if Corbyn means BTL landlords he is sorely mistaken following the Conservative party attacks on landlords through Section 24 mortgage interest relief restrictions, Stamp Duty surcharges for second homes and continued one sided legislation.

The Ministry of Housing put out a statement saying: “Everyone deserves a safe and decent home and we have given councils strong powers to crackdown on bad landlords and we expect them to use them. We have brought in £30,000 fines, are introducing a database of bad landlords and given councils £12m to enforce the law in hotspot areas. We are also supporting Karen Buck’s private member’s bill which will require all landlords ensure their properties are safe and give tenants the right to take legal action.”

There appears to be a never ending supply of political gain to be made out of confusing all good landlords with the term rogue, which should actually be criminal, landlord and the reason for the housing crisis.


Share This Article


Comments

Mark Alexander - Founder of Property118

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

8:40 AM, 3rd February 2018, About 7 years ago

Reply to the comment left by Neil Patterson at 03/02/2018 - 08:32
Who were you replying to Neil? It doesn't show, hence this comment to test whether it shows I'm replying to you.

Mick Roberts

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

9:57 AM, 3rd February 2018, About 7 years ago

Reply to the comment left by Mark Alexander at 30/01/2018 - 10:46
I concur Mark if that's how u spell it.
On these images they show and say BAD Landlords, the public think AHH Disgusting Landlord.
But if someone would explain, u look at the washing on the floor, is that the Landlords?
U look at the messy unmade bed, is that the Landlords?
The rubbish on the floor, is that the Landlords? It's normally the BBC that shows stuff like this.

Mandy Thomson

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

19:40 PM, 4th February 2018, About 7 years ago

Reply to the comment left by Wayne Hoban at 30/01/2018 - 11:00
True. When evictions by private landlords are counted, this often includes housing associations. It's also a fact that councils as social landlords do more evictions than private landlords.

Mandy Thomson

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

19:52 PM, 4th February 2018, About 7 years ago

Reply to the comment left by Asif Ahmed at 31/01/2018 - 13:57
Yes, many people who are "landlords" don't even think of themselves as such. I have to ask myself if landlord registration was brought in if this would go some way toward improving the image of landlords, though most landlord detractors seem to hate landlords because they charge rent for properties the envious feel should be theirs as of right.

DALE ROBERTS

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

20:10 PM, 4th February 2018, About 7 years ago

Reply to the comment left by Mandy Thomson at 04/02/2018 - 19:52I'm totally bemused by the UK governments attitude to landlords. It appears they have taken the easy populist route of deflecting attention away from their own massive shortcomings in attending to the housing crisis by a collective and sinister attack on landlords. When will they accept we are part of the solution? Not only do we provide accommodation that has to meet strict criteria, but this is at a discounted rate. We stabilise the property market. Every effort should be made to ease our investment exposure. Speaking as a landlord who has been subject to the very discriminatory laws that protect tenants, I find myself becoming less enchanted with the whole business as regulations become more punitive. I don't know of any other industry that would have to bear the cost of non-paying "clients" for up to a year - whilst the law takes it's very slow course in dealing with them- and trashed properties with no likelihood of recouping those costs.
I will be selling my properties in the UK and they are going to remain empty whilst I market them. Presently though, I am involved in the nasty and expensive process of evicting a serial non paying tenant who is more aware of her entitlements than her obligations. You know ... the kind of tenant that JC thinks should be even more protected.

Mandy Thomson

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

20:31 PM, 4th February 2018, About 7 years ago

This is not the first time that Jeremy Corbyn and his supporters have misrepresented facts to promote their political agenda and score points against their political opponents. John McDonnell tried to use the Grenfell tragedy to score points against Tory policy and private landlords (which was interesting, as the Grenfell tower is owned by a local authority, but hey hum) just days after several people died horribly in that disaster.

So using the same tactics, Jeremy Corbyn is himself a private landlord (or was in the recent past) and moreover is (or was) the type of landlord that has a much greater reputation for sharp practice and making renters lives miserable than the more usual live out landlord. If the cap fits...

Mandy Thomson

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

8:34 AM, 6th February 2018, About 7 years ago

Reply to the comment left by Mandy Thomson at 04/02/2018 - 20:31
Correction, it appears Mr Corbyn is no longer a landlord https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2016/01/jeremy-corbyn-no-longer-living-with-the-enemy/ (though I wonder if his lodger left of his own volition or was asked to move out AKA evicted...)

Mandy Thomson

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

9:16 AM, 6th February 2018, About 7 years ago

Reply to the comment left by Annie Landlord at 30/01/2018 - 13:29
And even more concerning still is that he failed to condemn Josh Connor's disgusting behaviour at Rees Mogg's speech the other day. Several other Labour MPs condemned it, but not the party's leader. I wonder why not?

IMHO a politician who founds movements with "populist" rhetoric and whips up ill informed thugs for support is a rogue. History has many examples of such leaders, and unfortunately, Corbyn is not the only "populist" extremist elected to a position or power of influence - look at Trump.

No, they're not poles apart, when you examine their ideologies, their beliefs and what they stand for they are very similar.

10 years ago, such politicians were simply odd balls on the fringes of politics (and society) - that's where they should stay.

DALE ROBERTS

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

10:56 AM, 6th February 2018, About 7 years ago

Reply to the comment left by Mandy Thomson at 06/02/2018 - 09:16And why is it presumed by these "champagne socialists" that all rented property is cheap and nasty. My units are in a very upmarket development overlooking the Thames, fully furnished and with Bosch appliances in the kitchen. The units are worth about GBP500 000.00 each. As they are quite new builds - it is impossible for me to recoup my costs against the rentals and as such my tenants enjoy very subsidised living at my expense.
In addition I have to adhere to a plethora of regulations regarding safety requirements, maintenance, replacement of broken fittings and furnishings, loss of possession during a rental, arrears, service charges, ground tax, trashed property, agents commissions and increasingly hostile UK government legislation that discriminates against me.
I'm determined to sell everything and invest elsewhere.

Old Mrs Landlord

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

11:30 AM, 6th February 2018, About 7 years ago

Reply to the comment left by Mandy Thomson at 06/02/2018 - 08:34
I see you use the neutral term "evicted" whereas the term invariably used by Labour, Shelter, Generation Rent etc. is "kicked out", giving the impression that landlords use physical violence to remove their tenants. This pejorative and inflammatory term reveals their bias and takes no account of the fact that most tenancies are ended by the tenant.

Leave Comments

In order to post comments you will need to Sign In or Sign Up for a FREE Membership

or

Don't have an account? Sign Up

Landlord Automated Assistant Read More