Buy to let mortgage dilemma- transfer of equity?

Buy to let mortgage dilemma- transfer of equity?

13:30 PM, 15th July 2015, About 10 years ago 6

Text Size

I wondered if anybody has experience of can advise on the following:dilemma

My sister and I started building a property portfolio around 15 years ago.

Two of the properties have mortgages in our joint names, the others are solely in one name. We have always recognised the properties as shared and have declared a split of the rental income/ losses on our respective tax returns over the years,

We are now realising this may cause significant problems for inheritance tax planning and are trying to seek the best way forward. We have spoken to our financial advisor and one of the simpler ways would be to add each other’s names to the properties in one name, however our mortgage lenders appear to be resistant to this idea.

Has anybody had experience of doing this and if so, any advice?

We are also looking at life assurance to enable our beneficiaries to be able to pay the ‘owed’ equity to the beneficiaries of the estate when one of us dies…. Any advice gratefully received.

June


Share This Article


Comments

Neil Patterson

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

13:34 PM, 15th July 2015, About 10 years ago

Hi June,

One of the reasons the BTL lenders may be unwilling to transfer to sole names is that you are reducing their security from 2 to 1 person.

A mortgage is joint and several. Meaning you are both equally liable for repaying not just half the loan but all of it if the other does not pay.

You may find it easier thought to remortgage to another lender in sole names if the LTV and stress testing are within current criteria.

Mark Alexander - Founder of Property118

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

20:18 PM, 15th July 2015, About 10 years ago

Hi June

Yes I have a lot of experience in this and one solution involves using a Declaration of Trust – see http://buytoletconveyancing.co.uk/declaration-of-trust/

However, this is not without its complications because transfer of equity (even beneficial interests) can trigger capital gains tax liabilities where the owners are not spouses or civil partners.

I recommend you contact the law firm I’ve linked to and that you seek professional advice from them.
.

Michelle O'Connor

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

20:21 PM, 15th July 2015, About 10 years ago

Hi June. If anything, providing the person being added to the deed and mortgage hasn't an adverse credit history, I would have thought the lender would be fine with this. For them, it spreads the risk over two people. If I have read the post correct, the deeds are in joint names, it is simply a mortgage issue.

Puzzler

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

15:50 PM, 17th July 2015, About 10 years ago

Lenders usually require the title deeds to reflect the names on the mortgage. The problem is that they'll have to go through all the hoops of checking out the person to be added as it will effectively be a new loan. Simply a mortgage issue is not "simply" any more due to the new affordability checks etc.

Neil, I think they want to add each other not reduce from joint to sole.

I presume all the sole properties are in the same name?

June Freeman

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

10:28 AM, 22nd July 2015, About 10 years ago

Thx everyone...and yes we want to add each other, where the mortgage is in a sole name. I'm going to speak to the inland revenue for advice too.

In terms of transferring equity by a declaration of trust, which we are happy to do, I would assume the 'gain' would not be taxable until realised? It's confusing because would the person transferring the equity be deemed to have made a capital loss?

We realise we have created a problem for ourselves and/or our beneficiaries and want to find the most practical/tax effective way forward.

Mark Alexander - Founder of Property118

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

11:04 AM, 22nd July 2015, About 10 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "June Freeman" at "22/07/2015 - 10:28":

Any gains become subject to tax at the point of transfer.

The person making the transfer would only be making a loss if the property is worth less now than was paid for it.
.

Leave Comments

In order to post comments you will need to Sign In or Sign Up for a FREE Membership

or

Don't have an account? Sign Up

Landlord Automated Assistant Read More