Summer Budget 2015 – Landlords Reactions

Summer Budget 2015 – Landlords Reactions

14:00 PM, 8th July 2015, About 10 years ago 9619

Text Size

Budget 2015 - Landlords Reactions

The concern is;

Budget proposals to “restrict finance cost relief to individual landlords”Summer Budget 2015 - Landlords Reactions

To calculate the impact of this policy on your personal finances download this software


Share This Article


Comments

TheMaluka

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

9:24 AM, 18th March 2016, About 9 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "Mark Alexander" at "18/03/2016 - 08:53":

Mark please do not credit this government with having any coherent plan or mindset. In my humble opinion everything Osborne has done is not for the good of the country neither will his actions solve any of the perceived problems with the economy.

Dr Rosalind Beck

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

9:30 AM, 18th March 2016, About 9 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "David Price" at "18/03/2016 - 09:24":

Yes, David, he is not an evil genius, more like an evil nincumpoop. Although, as Mark and Kathy say, he has been able to get away with it because of current interest rates and is keen to get that money off us. No-one cared when we were paying interest rates of around 7% and facing potential bankruptcy around 2007. No-one wanted a share in our losses.

Mark Alexander - Founder of Property118

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

9:43 AM, 18th March 2016, About 9 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "David Price" at "18/03/2016 - 09:24":

I'm not crediting his decisions with any intelligence whatsoever, they are very short sighted decisions because the unintended consequences have not been considered despite having been laid out before him in simple terms.

Nevertheless, I wanted to understand his mindset. I think it's what Kathy said, it's based on very simplistic logic that he needs money right now and the low interest rates means that landlord are likely to have money that he can grab, which we would not have had if it wasn't for low interest rates.
.

Andy Bell

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

13:05 PM, 18th March 2016, About 9 years ago

Gideon knows what he is doing:
Extra tax revenue even when it comes from tenant - win
Landlords forced to sell, pre-election capital gains tax - win
Higher rents makes buying corporate rabbit hutches more attractive -win.
City mates buy up all these new Ltd. Co. and get the HB - win
Any backlash it'll still be nasty grabbing landlords fault - win
Tenants, students, poverty stricken etc. non-voters - win
More votes for bashing landlords and benefit scroungers - win
No political opposition - win
Homelessness, lack of housing devolved to regions - win

Chris Novice Shark Bait

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

14:08 PM, 18th March 2016, About 9 years ago

George has excluded P.R.S. from C.G.T. deductions. This is further discrimination against us and introduces another argument for the JR team in this dynamic.

He has fouled up on P.I.P. big time. R.I.P.

Sugar tax: a red herring.

Let's not be diverted.

His mind set? make it up as I go along. David keeps smiling my way.

Hopeless!

Chris Novice Shark Bait

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

14:20 PM, 18th March 2016, About 9 years ago

George has discriminated against us again with C.G.T surcharge on residential property. This is a dynamic. The J.R. team need to look closely at this.

As to his mind set he seems to make it up as he goes along without doing his homework. Even when we share our homework he sticks to his dogma which supports an abundantly clear ulterior motive, consoled, presumably by the fact that David keeps smiling at him.
Has anyone noticed whether or not David's teeth are gritted?

Chris Novice Shark Bait

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

14:34 PM, 18th March 2016, About 9 years ago

I would if I could but struggling to do so not sure why????

Dr Rosalind Beck

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

17:01 PM, 18th March 2016, About 9 years ago

Check out my latest article on Professor Philip Booth's reaction to the CGT reduction and exclusion of landlords from this:

http://www.property118.com/tax-neutrality-abandoned-budget-states-professor-philip-booth/85526/

Jim

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

20:08 PM, 18th March 2016, About 9 years ago

I feel a bit cheeky asking this one but I think it could be a really useful tool if the people who developed the spread sheet for showing us how much extra tax we will be paying because of clause 24 could also produce a spread sheet showing us how our tax position would be improved if we were to incorporate. We could then physically compare one to the other and see how much extra tax we could save.

Matthew Stuart Haig

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

20:22 PM, 18th March 2016, About 9 years ago

My advice is ask your accountant to do it for you accurately.
we roughly worked it out but there are so many factors it'll be really hard to produce a one size fits all. We met with our accountant yesterday and he did projections for us, based on our average property income over the last 3 years added to our main income. we had a real shock because currently the property income is split 50/50 even though my hubby does 100% of the work. my property income takes me over the threshold of loosing my personal allowance so I end up paying 60% on my share. we have decided that incorporating makes sense because we can pay my hubby a wage, then only pay 20% corp tax or reinvest profits before the end of the tax tear. our accountant worked out that we would significantly lose money if we didn't and the clause came in, but incorporating was better regardless of whether it did or not, that was the eye opener for us. it makes sense if you want to hold properties for a long time, reinvest your profits and grow without paying tax and if you have a high wage

Leave Comments

In order to post comments you will need to Sign In or Sign Up for a FREE Membership

or

Don't have an account? Sign Up

Landlord Automated Assistant Read More