Summer Budget 2015 – Landlords Reactions

Summer Budget 2015 – Landlords Reactions

14:00 PM, 8th July 2015, About 9 years ago 9619

Text Size

Budget 2015 - Landlords Reactions

The concern is;

Budget proposals to “restrict finance cost relief to individual landlords”Summer Budget 2015 - Landlords Reactions

To calculate the impact of this policy on your personal finances download this software


Share This Article


Comments

Barry Fitzpatrick

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

8:30 AM, 16th September 2015, About 9 years ago

@Saeef,

I agree but it does indicate the strength of feeling ecevn though it is far from perfect.

Our opponents will use a low number against us.

Saeef Khan

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

8:37 AM, 16th September 2015, About 9 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "Barry Fitzpatrick" at "16/09/2015 - 08:30":

Barry absolutely right. The treasury could argue that, out of 2 million landlords only 29000 have raised their voice hence majority does not seem to have any issues with legislation.

However, I attended one of property seminar yesterday (free of charge of course) and I spoken to at least 11 people if I can count correctly and all of them responded that, it does not affect us as we are basic rate tax payers and will remain so.

I recall making my protestations to them you could be pushed into higher rate tax bracket as result of your gross turnover, however it seemed to fall on deaf ears.

Moral of story is more than 80% of people have not got a clue that, it will actually affect them...hence low numbers of petition.

Saeef Khan

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

8:45 AM, 16th September 2015, About 9 years ago

One of the lady who I spoken to, who I can categorically say is living under false pretences used exact words:

"Oh...it won't affect me dear, I earn around £28K a year and most of the profits I make from property I chuck it back in refurbishment therefore my profits remain zero as I own multiple properties, my interest costs as well refurb costs will never let me make any profits...all I do is sit back and look forward make Capital Gains"

As I attempted to explain, she responded "Anyway dear, nice chatting to you, good luck" and walked away.

TheMaluka

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

8:48 AM, 16th September 2015, About 9 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "Saeef Khan" at "16/09/2015 - 08:37":

Weather affected or not, landlord or not, tenant or not, in fact whatever you are or are not, you should vote against this draconian and immoral tax on turnover for it is the tip of the iceberg.

Aaron Levenstein said in one of my favourite quotes "Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital.”. The same principle may be applied to the 'Alice tax', what it may conceal is a move towards a turnover tax on all business.

Saeef Khan

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

8:48 AM, 16th September 2015, About 9 years ago

She resembled and spoke like John Cleece's wife from Fawlty Towers.

Harold Levine

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

8:49 AM, 16th September 2015, About 9 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "Appalled Landlord" at "15/09/2015 - 18:21":

Corporate entities still receive an allowance for inflation through indexation relief.

The previous commentary regarding highlighting the long term changes in the market as a result I think is very valid.
It would be a shame if that comment was overlooked.

Essentially he is saying there will be a short term boost to the tax base but in the longer term the housing market would move to a larger percentage of corporate ownership who will be paying tax at a much lower rate.

Saeef Khan

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

8:53 AM, 16th September 2015, About 9 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "David Price" at "16/09/2015 - 08:48":

David, I could not agree less, I influenced all my family, friends, (who own BTL properties) estate agents, broker and accountant to sign a petition and I am very passionate about getting this madness reversed.

However, as it is stated on petition website quite clearly that, once 100k signatures are reached it will be considered for debate (not guaranteed).

Joseph Bloggs

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

8:54 AM, 16th September 2015, About 9 years ago

Lisa S

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

9:23 AM, 16th September 2015, About 9 years ago

This link:

http://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=2015-09-09.9770.h&s=landlord#g9770.r0

as posted earlier by BTLIS has a button to vote whether you think David Gauke answered the question.
As he spouted the usual 'playingfield' answer, please can we all press the NO button.

Dr Rosalind Beck

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

9:28 AM, 16th September 2015, About 9 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "Ian Simpson" at "16/09/2015 - 06:53":

Hi Ian.
Thanks for letting us know. Just when we wanted to combat this myth that we drive prices up, this guy publishes nonsense about it. It really makes me think I have to question everything I (lazily) read in the papers from now on. We have to have a more critical eye and read behind the statistics and the way they are presented.

I suppose on the other hand, the Telegraph isn't our poodle - but it is disappointing. Hopefully, Richard Dyson won't feel he can't write a contrary article to his colleague - I don't see why that should be a problem for him - but it is a bit stupid of the Telegraph to not co-ordinate their articles, when they launch a campaign against something. I suppose they're not seeing the whole - the way that these statistics are selected to present a case about the bad old landlords.

Leave Comments

In order to post comments you will need to Sign In or Sign Up for a FREE Membership

or

Don't have an account? Sign Up

Landlord Automated Assistant Read More