7:16 AM, 11th March 2017, About 8 years ago 41
Text Size
The 2015 Conservative manifesto included the following pledge: “We will commit to no increases in VAT, National Insurance contributions or Income Tax”. To see a copy click here
Not everyone read it at the time, but very few people could have avoided seeing David Cameron on television on 29 April 2015 pledging that there would be no increase in income tax: click here
The Guardian printed the related press release that morning: click here
It stated: “David Cameron will pledge to introduce a new law within the first 100 days of a Conservative government to prevent any rises in income tax, VAT or national insurance in the next parliament.” And “In a keynote speech, designed to be one of the highlights in a week of Tory campaigning on the economy, the prime minister will say on Wednesday: “This is the clearest choice on the economy for a generation. And beyond the plain facts, it also comes down to gut instinct. When you’re standing in the polling booth, ask yourself: on the things that matter in your life, who do you really trust?
“When it comes to your tax bill: do you trust the people who taxed you to the hilt when they were in power and still haven’t come clean about the taxes they want to increase next time round? Or do you trust the Conservatives, who have cut income taxes for 26 million people and who will cut your taxes again next time?””
These were excellent questions.
This week Philip Hammond broke the promise by announcing an increase in NI contributions for the self-employed. This resulted in a media onslaught and several Tory MP’s spoke out against the breach of promise which would increase the NI deduction by 1% of someone’s income. The Daily Telegraph’s deputy editor Allister Heath described the move as an unforced error.
However, there has been a deafening silence from MP’s over the first breach of promise – which was announced a mere 10 weeks after Cameron made it on TV.
In July 2015 George Osborne announced Clause/Section 24, restricting the deductibility of mortgage interest for landlords who bought properties in their own names. This means that many will pay tax on a fictitious amount of profit with effect from April 2017, increasing their Income Tax.
The result of the NI increase for a self-employed person earning £50,000, according to Patrick Collinson’s video in the first article above, will be an increase of £500 a year, or 1%
Whereas Section 24 will more than triple the tax of one landlord that I know, and leave her without enough to live on, as described on page 12 of Dr Beck’s report: click here
She will not be entitled to any benefits though because of her fictitious income!
She will have to pay an extra 60% of her income in tax because her tax rate will go up to 83%. This increase will be 60 times as big as that resulting from the NI increase, but Tory MP’s have kept silent about that, despite the complaints they have received from taxpayers for the last 20 months.
Dr Beck’s report describes how, in order to be able to pay the extra tax and prevent bankruptcy, the landlords with the most properties have to increase the rents they charge, often for the first time in years. As tenants on capped benefits cannot afford the increases, they are being evicted and made homeless. Councils have to put them in “temporary” accommodation at greater cost.
Homelessness is going to increase enormously due to the breach of promise that is Section 24. It will be an unforced disaster, not just in terms of the human misery of the extra homeless, but in the economic lunacy of paying more to accommodate them in hotels and B&B’s.
But where is the media uproar? Where are the objections from Tory MP’s?
And where are the objections from Opposition MP’s for that matter?
Previous Article
Tax relief on renting a room is to be reviewedNext Article
Declaration of trust from company to individual?
Gromit
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up15:05 PM, 15th March 2017, About 8 years ago
Just sent this to my MP:
Dear Andrew,
I see that today both the Chancellor of the #exchequer and the Prime Minister have states that they will abide with the letter and the spirit of the Conservative manifesto.
Would you therefore write to both the PM and Chancellor requesting that in accordance with their statements to Parliament today that they repeal s.24 of Finance Act 2015 as it break the pledge make and increases the effective rates of Income Tax that Landlords have to pay to 60/70/80 and in some cases in excess of 100% of actual profits. Please ask them not to use weasel words saying that the rates have not been raised (which is true) but they’ve deemed that finance costs (mortgage interest) should be treated as taxable income.
I will eagerly await their answers.
Can I urge everyone to write to their own MP as well?
Gromit
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up21:51 PM, 15th March 2017, About 8 years ago
Received this reply:
I'll send your note but I don't think they'll see it that way since if people's incomes were the benchmark there would be no possibility of any changes at all.
He doesn’t quite understand “No Income Tax rises” means “no rises in Income Tax” - simples (except for politicians)
I now have to wait 4 weeks for another “standard” Treasury piece of sophistry.
NW Landlord
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up21:54 PM, 15th March 2017, About 8 years ago
Waste of time barry I'm afraid
Appalled Landlord
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up22:08 PM, 15th March 2017, About 8 years ago
On the BBC 2 Daily Politics programme today Andrew Neil interviewed Tory MP Rory Stewart about the NIC increase . Stewart is Minister of State, International Development.
Andrew Neil had said “If you were self-employed, and you voted Conservative in the last election on the basis of that [manifesto] promise, you voted on a false prospectus.”
Stewart replied “The majority of self-employed people will not be worse off under this measure.” Sound familiar? He later added “We take our manifesto commitments very seriously.”
After the news broke 13 minutes in, Andrew Neil asked why this government’s Chancellors were so useless, and mentioned Osborne’s U-turn over tax credits in his last budget.
He then asked Stewart if the U-turn was what he wanted to happen, and Stewart said it was the right thing to do, to comply with the spirit of the manifesto.
How can any Tory MP say the opposite?
Gromit
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up22:26 PM, 15th March 2017, About 8 years ago
Reply to the comment left by "NW Landlord" at "15/03/2017 - 21:54":
You're probably right but then nothing ventured............
One day I'll touch a nerve, and he'll get off the fence and do something.
NW Landlord
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up22:27 PM, 15th March 2017, About 8 years ago
Agreed barry didn't mean to sound negative
Gromit
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up22:40 PM, 15th March 2017, About 8 years ago
Reply to the comment left by "NW Landlord" at "15/03/2017 - 22:27":
These Tory politicians (probably all politicians) are totally shameless and without any kind of consience. My MP said to my face that he had nothing to do with Government policy, but had no answer when asked him if he'd voted in favour of this measure (which I knew he had) without which this measure would not now be on the statute books.
Dr Rosalind Beck
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up23:11 PM, 15th March 2017, About 8 years ago
Reply to the comment left by "Barry Fitzpatrick" at "15/03/2017 - 22:40":
Yes Barry. This whole thing has been a horrible eye opener.
Gromit
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up23:26 PM, 15th March 2017, About 8 years ago
Reply to the comment left by "Dr Rosalind Beck" at "15/03/2017 - 23:11":
With comments like his, it makes double glazing and used car salesmen look whiter than white.
TheMaluka
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up15:11 PM, 18th March 2017, About 8 years ago
Here we go again.
"Homeowners who let their spare rooms to holidaymakers, using sites such as Airbnb, could be taxed on more of their rental income under new government plans.
It is looking at removing or reducing the £7,500 per annum rent-a-room tax relief given to homeowners who take short-term guests."
http://www.travelmole.com/news_feature.php?news_id=2026297
No doubt it will be spun as taking away a relief rather than increasing a tax.