Robert M

You are running a House in Multiple Occupation (HMO), so it is YOU that is responsible for paying the Council Tax, and you that is responsible for paying the utility bills (gas, electricity, water, broadband, etc). You are also the person responsible for insuring the house as a HMO, and ensuring you have permission from your mortgage lender to let the house as a HMO.

You are also responsible for maintaining the property, and this includes not just repairs and property maintenance, but also ensuring the cleanliness of the communal areas.

You also need to look at your responsibilities not just as a landlord, but as a HMO manager (the HMO regulations), as well as HHSRS and other regulations.

Hopefully you have got the mains interlinked fire alarm system and compliant fire doors throughout, and have a Fire Risk Assessment for the property.

You should also check whether the property is in an Article 4 area, or selective licencing area, and understand the implications accordingly.

I would suggest that you seek professional help from an eviction specialist that understands the HMO regulations and is able to assist you with the evictions. Then, if you still wish to be a landlord, stick to whole house (single tenancy) lets to a single household, (or a lease to a housing association or charity).... Read More

Debts owed by former tenants, can sometimes be recovered, even if they are in receipt of benefits. This is our process:
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/rkhu1hbx2vu09mattbzhb/CHT-Shergroup-Debt-Recovery-Process-Dec-2022.docx?rlkey=v1nr5avrci545hj0g23hczmeb&st=3dl5mx1m&dl=0

While this process doesn't work every time, overall it does seem to be an effective debt recovery strategy for rent arrears. However, you may need to have clauses in your AST or other documentation that allows this type of debt recovery.... Read More

I have a second floor flat where there were frequent reports of water leaks into the flat below. Upon invasive investigation it was found that the copper pipework had been set into the concrete floor of the flat, without any protective lagging, so that over time the acids in the concrete gradually dissolve the copper causing "pinholes" in the pipework.

This is clearly a construction defect as it is built in to the fabric of the structure.

The freeholder denied responsibility, the block management company denied responsibility, and of course I as the leaseholder of the flat also denied responsibility (as it was nothing to do with my flat itself, it was a construction fault, and the same issues were happening with other parts of the building).

After 2 - 3 years of arguing with the block management company, and temporary repairs via the block insurance policy (via the block management company), it was eventually agreed that the block management company would pay for the re-piping of the water system so that all pipework is above the flat's floor level (so would no longer be set in corrosive concrete, and pipes could be accessed without digging channels and holes into the concrete floor of the flat). - There's been no problems or leaks reported since that date (about 5 years ago).... Read More

The post didn't make it clear as to how the situation jumped from talking to the tenants, to the landlord having regained control of the property, but you have then explained to Paul Essex that you utilised the forfeiture clause to "cut out" the R2R operator.
This case does show the importance of using a proper lease agreement, which contains the forfeiture clause, for any R2R agreement, whether to a private R2R operator, or to a social landlord, charity/not for profit organisation, or local council.
Overall, a positive outcome for the individual residents, and the landlord.... Read More

Did any of the councils or housing associations take you up on your generous offer Mick?... Read More

If they are a limited company housing association (as may be the case with smaller housing associations) then you can check their current trading status (active, dissolved, in administration, struck off, etc) on Companies House website.

If they are a Registered Provider of Social Housing (as most large housing associations are), then you can check for them on the website of the Regulator of Social Housing.

If they are a registered charity (some, but not all, housing associations may also be a registered charity), then you could check with the Charity Commission.

If the housing association is a Community Interest Company (CIC) then you could check with the CIC Regulator.

In relation to your ability to end the lease, (and the legal consequences of this), this should be stated in your lease agreement, and you may need to obtain professional legal advice on how to deal with the situation lawfully.... Read More

We are a not-for-profit provider of supported housing. We lease properties from private landlords. When one of our landlords needed to sell their property at the end of our lease term they decided to sell to the Council.

We were required by the council to evict 4 residents from the property we leased, so that the council could buy the property from the owner with vacant possession.

We did ask the council to buy with the residents in situ, but they would not do this.

We asked if they would buy, and re-lease lease to us so that we could keep the residents housed and supported, but the council would not do this.

We did ask the council to rehouse our four residents, as it was the council that was requiring them to be evicted, but the council initially said they would, but then reneged on this and failed to house them.

We were left with no choice but to evict our four residents, effectively at the council's insistence (as they would only complete the purchase once the property was vacant).

At the last moment we did manage to rehouse one of the four residents, but the other three became street homeless (rough sleepers), as the council refused to even provide emergency accommodation for them.

The council now own that property, and I believe it has stood vacant ever since (from March 2023).... Read More

This is not a new problem, for decades people experiencing homelessness are placed in a homeless hostel where they can receive housing and support, but when they are ready to move on into self-contained accommodation, there is simply none available.

The shortage of affordable 1 bedroom "move on" properties is a major problem for all supported housing providers (e.g. homeless hostels), and leads to the same type of "bed blocking" type issues as is encountered in hospitals. If people have nowhere to move on to, then there is no space in the hostels for other homeless people to move in to.... Read More

There are many things that the government (or government supported agencies such as TDS and Crisis and Shelter, etc) could do to improve access to the private rented sector, but they are not willing to do, and instead they "tinker" at the edges and achieve little if any positive outcomes.

Rent deposit schemes, rent in advance schemes, "renting ready" training courses, are not new, these and a myriad of other initiatives have been around for decades, and have little effect on reducing homelessness.

There is a housing shortage, and this is particularly acute for renters. Those needing or wishing to rent a home face the barriers of lack of supply and a high demand, so why would any private landlord choose to let their property to a homeless person or family, or those in receipt of benefits (Local Housing Allowance) who are usually considered to be a much higher risk?

The answer perhaps lies with reducing the risk so that it is lower risk than letting to another household. This can be done by a combination of initiatives, such as those proposed, BUT I think the most important thing that the government, local government, Shelter, Crisis, Generation Rent, et al could do would be to put their money where their mouth is and actually act as a GUARANTOR (rent AND damage guarantor) for all the households that they want the private landlords to house for them.

If government and Shelter etc really do want to house the homeless, then they need to either build or lease properties themselves and then house the people in those properties, OR act as a legally liable guarantor so that private landlords have the assurances they need to take on that risk.... Read More

The failure of councils to be able to effectively run projects that are, in effect, letting and management agents for private rented housing, is widespread and there are examples of this from around the country.
This is of course with the benefit of taxpayer money to prop up their operational costs, plus a much less regulated operating environment (should be the same enforcement criteria as for private landlords, but as councils are the prosecutors, they are obviously not going to prosecute themselves).... Read More

I run a small not for profit company that leases properties in Sheffield from private landlords, for use in providing supported housing for people experiencing homelessness. We have been doing this since 2004, so have 20 years experience.

We have made mistakes along the way, but have learnt from those mistakes and improved our service offering to both the owner landlords, and also to our residents. We usually offer 6 year lease agreements at around the LHA rate for that size property, but we also provide full maintenance and repairs (non-structural), and we pay for some improvements (e.g. fire doors, fire alarm systems, electrical upgrades, etc), and we pay for the EPC, EICR, and gas safety inspections. Most of the landlords we lease from are happy to renew their lease with us time and time again.

We do see a lot of Rent2Rent operators making BIG mistakes in their set up and paperwork, which can then put the owner landlord at risk of legal consequences. However, this is much more dominant with private "for profit" R2R operators, rather than those who are genuine "not for profit" operators, as the source and security of funding is very different, and this is crucial to the level of risk.

As with all potential business dealings, it is important that each party does their own due diligence on the other party, and satisfies themselves that they fully understand the legal agreement that they are about to enter into.

Each party should ask all the awkward questions of each other, e.g. what happens if the residents don't pay, who is responsible if the drains get blocked, what happens if residents trash the house, who pays for repairs if the slates fall off the roof, what if residents refuse to leave at the end of the lease term, etc, etc.
- If you are not satisfied with the answers provided (always get the answers in writing) then walk away from the deal.
- If you are satisfied with the answers (and the due diligence on the organisation), then still tread carefully and get all documents checked by a professional legal adviser.... Read More

As Rupert has said, the situation should have been discussed and negotiated prior to entering into the lease arrangement with the housing association, and the agreed terms should be stated in the lease document that you signed (or the previous owner signed, but you have taken on).

Generally speaking, there should be provision within the lease terms for the HA to hand back the property to you with vacant possession (after the agreed notice period), and if they fail to do so then what happens in this situation (e.g. continuation with a rent increase, or compensation for breach, or transfer of tenancies to you, etc).

As the first thing to do, to find out the answer to your question, you need to look at all the paperwork, particularly the lease to the HA, but also the conveyancing paperwork where such questions should also have been asked by you and your solicitor and answered by the seller via their solicitor.... Read More

The ease of getting payments from a tenant's benefits will often depend of what benefit they are receiving, any other deductions, what the payment is for, and why you are requesting the payment.

The rules regarding "Third Party Deductions" aka "Third Party Payments" are different for those in receipt of Universal Credit as opposed to those who are receiving JSA or ESA.

It can be fairly straightforward getting the TPDs for rent and service charge arrears (for JSA/ESA claimants) if there are over 2 months arrears, but more complex if under 2 months of arrears (or if it is just the "ongoing" weekly service charge you are requesting payment of).

For Universal Credit claims, it can be much more difficult. Quite often, the initial application to Universal Credit is rejected, often due to UC staff not understanding the TPD availability or process, or prioritising other TPDs (contrary to the hierarchy of priority laid down in statute and guidance), so you may need to escalate your request to an area manager or other DWP staff member that does understand how to implement TPDs.... Read More

You cannot unilaterally add clauses to the tenancy agreement (AST), after the date when the AST was signed by both parties. It is important to ensure that your AST contains all the clauses needed at the outset, including any clauses relating to recovery of costs incurred.... Read More

Presumably you have a copy of the original (not forged) tenancy agreement, and will have had this completed either online (so there is an audit trail for the signing etc), or you (or your agent) met with the tenant face to face and got the AST signed and witnessed? In which case you would simply rely on the original AST?

If the tenant then produces a forged AST, then what sort of things would evidence that it is forged? For example, your signature? the witness's signature? evidence of photocopying? Do you have other examples of the tenants, and witness's signatures, e.g. copy of their passport for when you did the right to rent checks?

How do you even know that the tenant has forged an AST? Have you already taken legal action and they then produced the forged document?

Have you consulted with an eviction specialist, or a specialist solicitor?

There are so many variables that I think you need to sit down with a specialist legal adviser and show them ALL the documentation.... Read More

A SERCO lease is simply a "rent 2 rent" arrangement, but with the understanding that SERCO is a very large national company with huge government contracts. As Judith has already stated, you should read the lease terms very carefully as the sample lease I have seen from them is potentially very onerous on the landlord, e.g. frequency of you having to redecorate, replace kitchens, replace bathrooms, etc.

An alternative option for you may be to lease the property to a local Supported Living (Supported Housing) provider. This may be a charity, CIC, or other not for profit organisation, as they may be able to offer you better terms, e.g. https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/9vuqwc8lsv9m26n7xtws5/Private-Sector-Leasing-information-October-2022.docx?rlkey=vt95im8k7ng4d5lwnnpuffagn&dl=0
Disclaimer: my company is this not-for-profit Supported Living provider, (but we only operate in Sheffield, so unless your property is there then there is no vested interest).... Read More

I believe that Section 18 of the Distress For Rent Act 1737 is still valid law (check with your solicitor) and provides you with a remedy for this situation (by way of "double rent" from the tenant). If you (or better still your solicitor) write to the tenant advising them of this remedy, and how it would affect them, I'm sure that they will more than double their efforts to move out before the end of their notice period.

You may also wish to consider serving a s21 Notice as well, and/or a s8 Notice (ground 8) if applicable.... Read More

That's just cruel Mick, you can't dangle that carrot and then expect me to wait until 3rd January to hear the news!!!... Read More

... Read More

Each local authority (LA) have to provide emergency accommodation to SOME homeless households in accordance with their statutory duties under Part VII of the Housing Act 2006 (as amended), and in accordance with caselaw that has interpreted the legislation and set relevant legal precedents.

The legislation and caselaw also sets out the circumstances when a LA's duty to provide accommodation can be ended, and this may differ depending on the specific legal duty under which the person(s) are accommodated, e.g. if the person is classed as having no priority need (as defined in the legislation) then the LA may have no duty to house them, but may choose to do so in specific circumstances, e.g. if temperature falls below 0 degrees, (this is often known as "SWEP" - Severe Weather Emergency Provision). There are processes in place for the ending of accommodation provision depending on the LA's legal duties, and this may vary from instant eviction through to eviction after reasonable notice, with what is "reasonable" being determined the the facts of each specific case.

Each LA will have their own processes for obtaining emergency/temporary accommodation, and this will vary from one LA to another to take account of what options are available to them. How such accommodation is paid for will also vary, for example, a room at the local Travelodge or B&B is likely to be billed to and paid direct by the LA, whereas a temporary placement into a housing association property may mean that the rent is payable by the resident but they may then be able to claim Housing Benefit to assist with the payment of that rent. In some circumstances HB may also be claimed by residents of other emergency housing such as B&Bs, with the claim being assessed under different legislative provisions due to the fact that it is an emergency homelessness placement (such that the accommodation charges are paid in full by HB, not just up to the LHA level).

So in answer to the question of who is liable to pay the rent in emergency accommodation, the answer is "it depends".

In relation to whether benefit recipients have to pay tax on their benefit income, as asked by NewYorkie, again the answer is "it depends", as some types of welfare benefits are taxable, however most income based welfare benefits are not taxable.... Read More