VAT Time Bomb for Property Investors Following Rent to Serviced Accommodation (R2SA) Business Models

For years, the Rent to Serviced Accommodation (R2SA) business model has been championed as a low-cost entry point into property investment. Promoted heavily by property education courses, this strategy involved leasing residential properties, forming Limited Companies, and subletting those properties as short-term lets under the Tour Operators’ Margin Scheme (TOMS). However, the recent HMRC v Sonder Europe Ltd Upper Tribunal ruling has turned this model into a potential financial disaster.

The implications are far-reaching, not just for future VAT liabilities but also for historical tax years. HMRC may now revisit past VAT filings, leaving businesses and directors scrambling to assess their exposure—and in some cases, protect their personal assets.

The Ruling That Changed Everything

The Sonder Europe ruling confirmed that many R2SA businesses cannot use TOMS to reduce VAT liabilities. Key findings from the Tribunal included:

1. Long-Term Leases: Properties leased on a long-term basis for subletting as short-term accommodation do not qualify as services purchased for resale under TOMS.
2. Property Modifications: Furnishing or adapting properties disqualifies them from TOMS, which requires minimal processing.
3. Historical VAT Risks: HMRC has the authority to assess and reclaim underpaid VAT, with potential penalties and interest.

The ruling forces businesses to account for VAT on the full value of their supplies rather than just their profit margins. This could result in an effective 20% increase in tax liability—a crippling burden for many.

Is HMRC Targeting Directors Personally?

The decision also raises a critical question: will HMRC attempt to pierce the corporate veil? For R2SA businesses operated through Limited Companies, directors often believed they were shielded from personal liability. However, HMRC could pursue directors under certain circumstances, including:

• Fraud or Misrepresentation: If HMRC finds evidence of deliberate underreporting of VAT or misuse of TOMS, directors could be held personally liable.
• Improper Use of Company Funds: Dividends or loans taken by directors while VAT liabilities were underpaid could lead to accusations of misuse.
• Recklessness or Negligence: Failing to seek proper tax advice or ignoring VAT obligations may expose directors to claims of negligence.
• Insolvent Trading: Directors of companies that continue trading while unable to meet tax debts could face personal liability under insolvency laws.

One tax specialist warned, “HMRC is becoming increasingly aggressive in pursuing directors personally when they believe there has been abuse of the corporate structure.”

Historical VAT Liabilities: How Far Back Could HMRC Go?

Under VAT legislation, HMRC can reopen past returns for up to four years—or up to 20 years in cases of deliberate misrepresentation. This means R2SA businesses that followed TOMS guidance could face:

• Backdated VAT Assessments: Full VAT liability on all rental income, not just the margin.
• Penalties and Interest: Additional charges that can double or triple the total liability.
• Personal Financial Risk: In cases of negligence or misuse, directors could find themselves personally liable.

“The combination of backdated liabilities and penalties could bankrupt even well-established businesses,” one VAT adviser noted.

The Role of Property Education Courses

Many R2SA operators were introduced to this business model through property education courses that painted a simplified picture of VAT compliance. While these courses promised a fast track to wealth, they often failed to address the complexities of VAT law and the risks of using TOMS.

One affected operator shared, “I followed the course advice to the letter. Now I’m looking at years of backdated VAT and wondering how I’ll pay.”

The Sonder Europe ruling raises the question of whether these course providers could face scrutiny for promoting models that may not align with VAT regulations.

What Should R2SA Businesses Do Now?

If your business followed the R2SA model, it’s vital to act immediately to mitigate potential risks:

1. Review Past VAT Filings: Work with a VAT specialist to assess whether your filings comply with the latest interpretation of TOMS.
2. Engage Legal and Tax Advisers: Seek professional advice to understand your liabilities and options for addressing them.
3. Proactively Approach HMRC: Voluntary disclosure of any underpaid VAT can reduce penalties and demonstrate good faith.
4. Consider Restructuring: Businesses may need to explore new models that minimise VAT risks while remaining compliant.
5. Protect Personal Finances: Avoid actions that could blur the line between personal and corporate funds, which may expose directors to personal liability.

Could the Case Be Appealed?

There is still a possibility that Sonder Europe will appeal the decision to the Supreme Court. While an appeal might buy the industry some time, experts caution that businesses should not rely on this as a long-term solution.

“Even if the case is appealed, the likelihood of overturning the Upper Tribunal’s decision is slim,” one solicitor remarked. “Operators must prepare for the worst and start restructuring now.”

The Future of the R2SA Model

The Sonder Europe ruling signals a seismic shift in the R2SA business model. Operators, property owners, and investors must now grapple with the reality of higher VAT liabilities, increased scrutiny from HMRC, and the potential for significant financial losses.

Questions remain about the viability of this model moving forward:

• Can operators adapt to the new VAT regime without collapsing under the financial strain?
• Will property owners face reduced demand for long-term leases?
• Should HMRC hold education course providers accountable for promoting risky strategies?

Join the Conversation

Are you a property owner, operator, or investor affected by this ruling? Share your thoughts and strategies in the comments below:

• What steps are you taking to review and address VAT risks?
• Do you believe education course providers should face accountability?
• How do you see the R2SA business model evolving in the future?

Let’s work together to navigate this challenging time and ensure a sustainable path forward for the serviced accommodation industry.

Conclusion

The Sonder Europe ruling is a wake-up call for the R2SA industry. With HMRC likely to pursue backdated VAT liabilities and potentially target directors personally, now is the time to act. By seeking expert advice and proactively addressing risks, operators can protect their businesses and personal assets.

Don’t wait for HMRC to knock—be prepared when they do.

Share This Article