Renters’ Rights Bill could overwhelm England’s tribunals

Renters’ Rights Bill could overwhelm England’s tribunals

0:03 AM, 17th October 2024, About 2 months ago 8

Text Size

The English tribunal system is already overburdened and ill-equipped to handle the potential surge in new claims stemming from the Renters’ Rights Bill, research reveals.

Proptech company Reapit says that between 2019 and 2023, the number of fair or market rent cases before England’s Residential Property Tribunals increased by nearly 89%, from 483 to 921.

These cases arise when tenants contest a Section 13 rent rise notice.

However, once the Bill becomes law, Section 13 will be the sole method landlords can use to raise rents, which can only occur annually.

Frustrations will grow for landlords

Reapit’s general manager, Steve Richmond, said: “Without ramping up funding for our courts and tribunals, frustrations will grow for both tenants and landlords.

“The Renters’ Rights Bill brings significant changes but adds more pressure to an already strained system.

“We’re also concerned the government hasn’t fully considered the added costs to courts and tribunals, as no impact assessment has been published.

“When making a fair or market rent judgement, a tribunal will often ask to view the property. This adds additional time and cost to the proceedings.

“Instead, evidence such as photos and videos submitted digitally should be used to make the decision to reduce costs.”

Rising tribunal caseload

By the end of last March, the number of open cases at the tribunals was more than 8,000 — that’s a 144% rise since 2019 and highlights the rising tribunal caseload.

The latest English Housing Survey reports that there are 4.6 million households in the private rented sector (PRS).

Under the Renters’ Rights Bill, any tenant served with a Section 13 notice could challenge the rent hike in a tribunal, potentially leading to millions of additional cases annually.

Despite concerns raised about court and tribunal services during the second reading of the Bill, the government is pressing forward.

The Minister of State for Housing and Planning, Matthew Pennycook, explained during the debate that he was not prepared to wait until the courts improve to reform the PRS.

Deputy Prime Minister and Secretary of State for Housing, Angela Rayner, acknowledged the ‘huge pressures on the court system’ and announced plans to work with the Ministry of Justice to digitise the county court possession process.

‘Publish a database of market rents’

Mr Richmond said: “We also think the government should publish a database of market rents, so tenants can check if their rents are close to market rates before they apply to a tribunal.

“It will also mean all tribunals are working from the same data.

“If landlords lack confidence in the court and tribunal system to handle rent appeals and evictions quickly and fairly, we are concerned about the unintended consequences.”

He adds: “We need the government to address the court and tribunal backlog because lengthy delays will burden both landlords and tenants with months of uncertainty.

“This could lead to a drop in tenant satisfaction, and we fear landlords may exit the sector.

“This would happen at a time when more homes are urgently needed in the PRS.”

Committee of Public Accounts has expressed concerns

However, the Committee of Public Accounts has expressed concerns about the reforms and its 2023 report pointed to slow progress on digitisation.

It also warned of major challenges in integrating systems across courts and tribunals.

According to the report, the way HM Courts and Tribunals Service had implemented part of the digitisation process ‘increased the burden on courts and staff already under significant pressure’.

There was also a ‘failure to engage sufficiently with staff and stakeholders’.

The project has also faced escalating costs – which have raced past £1 billion – and raised concerns about whether the original goals for efficiency and accessibility can still be met.


Share This Article


Comments

Ian Narbeth

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

11:03 AM, 17th October 2024, About 2 months ago

If it is one way bet for tenants - appeal even the smallest rise and its implementation will be delayed for months - and guess what? Many tenants will appeal. We will have to study the legislation but one option might be to propose a rent increase of £X a month but then offer, on a without prejudice basis, a smaller increase if they agree not to appeal it. At least that puts the tenant at a slight risk. However, if the cases take months to be heard, the arithmetic may favour appealing every proposed increase.

It is outrageous that rent increases can be delayed like this. In the commercial world if a rent review is not agreed or determined by the review date, the tenant continues to pay rent and when the review is settled, pays the back rent, together with interest at base rate on the arrears. That's a fair system.

It won't just be rent review cases that clog up the system. A massive increase in section 8 cases will make matters much, much worse for landlords.

TheMaluka

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

12:22 PM, 17th October 2024, About 2 months ago

Imagine a world in which similar rules were applied to other of Maslow's physiological needs, food, water, sewage etc. Why is shelter singled out for special treatment?

Downsize Government

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

14:53 PM, 17th October 2024, About 2 months ago

Reply to the comment left by TheMaluka at 17/10/2024 - 12:22
My thoughts exactly.

Also...
Mr Richmond said: “We also think the government should publish a database of market rents, so tenants can check if their rents are close to market rates before they apply to a tribunal.

Market rents are what's on the market now. Not some database with fictitious and old rents.

Darren Sullivan

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

16:39 PM, 17th October 2024, About 2 months ago

Reply to the comment left by Downsize Government at 17/10/2024 - 14:53
Exactly, Proptech company? Who want to introduce a market rent database based on what?

Surely if the government want to introduce this they need to extract data from HMRC and nowhere else to arrive at a true figure.

Ian Narbeth

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

10:39 AM, 18th October 2024, About 2 months ago

Reply to the comment left by Darren Sullivan at 17/10/2024 - 16:39
The Government has lots of data from Stamp Duty Land Tax returns concerning rents on commercial properties.

There is much less for residential lettings because the leases are not registerable. The last thing we want is having to register details of every letting. Knowing this Government, instead of the tenant registering (as is the case with SDLT) landlords would be required to do so and fined massively for any delay or error in doing so!

DPT

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

10:45 AM, 18th October 2024, About 2 months ago

And the Government claims they're not in favour of rent controls.

TheMaluka

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

11:03 AM, 18th October 2024, About 2 months ago

It is now taking a year or more to get possession of empty property where the tenant has not given notice. Does the government not appreciate that this is contributing to the housing crisis?

Paul Essex

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

13:11 PM, 19th October 2024, About 2 months ago

A database of market rent would be entirely spurious, even theoretically identical houses can have vastly different internal standards, state of the art kitchens and bathrooms, higher EPC, newer windows.

There is no way that the market rent can be fairly set by street let alone areas of a town.

Leave Comments

In order to post comments you will need to Sign In or Sign Up for a FREE Membership

or

Don't have an account? Sign Up

Landlord Automated Assistant Read More