9:06 AM, 19th July 2024, About 4 months ago 22
Text Size
So, where do we begin? The Renters (Reform) Bill is dead, long live the Renters’ Rights Bill! But is it better or worse than what the Tories had planned for the private rented sector? Well, I think the prospect of bringing in rent controls should alarm landlords everywhere.
I’ll come onto the other issues later, but the prospect of tenants objecting to rent rises will lead to a huge issue.
Of course, lots of them will object – they don’t care if their landlord can afford their buy to let mortgage, selective licensing fee and the other onerous running costs.
But Labour will be knocked sideways by this idea because there’s something coming down the train tracks, they haven’t factored in which could decimate the PRS as we know it – and there’s nothing they can do about it.
The idea that tenants can object to rent rises will play well to the activist groups because all PRS landlords are just mean. Right?
Wrong. Most of us just want to invest in a property that we can sell at some point, inevitably to fund a pension pot, so we need tenants. Good tenants, that is.
How many landlords will decide that an objection will be upheld since the courts are apparently so anti-landlord?
And if we don’t raise the rent to at least cover our costs or make a small profit, we have one of two options: not put the rent up or sell.
Which would you do? I’m guessing it’s going to be easier to sell, rather than put up with more nonsense from the naïve socialists.
I’ve mentioned before that we should also expect to see restrictions on selling – and a big increase in CGT, obviously.
This lack of understanding consequences of actions is going to be a serious issue over the coming years as landlords struggle to make sense of the new law.
It looks like there will be a tribunal of sorts for tenants to object to which will then reject or limit the rent increase. It would be nice if they would accept it, but I’m not holding out much hope.
That’s because we already have a court system that is weighed heavily against landlords and here’s a legal hurdle that will, in all likelihood, side with tenants.
This means the Renters’ Rights Bill will effectively bring in rent controls without a debate and by the back door.
The Bill is aimed entirely at scapegoating landlords and plays to the crowd. This is one battle that landlords cannot win.
Having seen some of the amendments that were made to the Renters (Reform) Bill by Labour, I’m dreading what else might be delivered.
Essentially, landlords are being held accountable for the failings of various governments.
We didn’t build enough homes to house the millions of people who have turned up here. You did.
Labour says the Bill introduces a fairer rental market, but for whom? It certainly won’t be for landlords, and as time will prove, it won’t be fair for tenants either.
And should de facto rent controls be brought in then we will have a holy mess of a PRS to sort out.
Just look at Scotland and the antics of a Lefty, SNP government that punished landlords with a rent cap – rents rocket and landlords leave.
Reading Property118 and what impact the Bill will have, here’s my response:
Let’s wrap up with my mention earlier about what is coming down the tracks that could blow the PRS apart.
It’s in a story on Property118 about renters getting older and portfolio landlords expanding.
The story ends with this sentence: ‘With 350,000 buy to let mortgages due to mature in the next year, landlords who are refinancing could see mortgage bills increase by £225 per month.’
It seems such a casual fact to bandy about but that’s a lot of landlords who will be looking at increasing the rent by a hefty amount.
And if tenants can object to a rent rise, what will the government, the councils, tenants and landlords do when the rent doesn’t go up?
I imagine there will be a lot of finger pointing and landlord blaming.
But don’t worry renters, the government is building 1.5 million homes in the next five years.
That won’t be quick enough to house you but, wait, Labour has already said most of that number will go to illegals and asylum seekers in temporary accommodation.
So, you won’t be getting houses, and your landlord will sell up – also hurting house prices – and you’ll struggle to find somewhere else to live.
We really do get the politicians we deserve.
Until next time,
The Landlord Crusader
Previous Article
Invented gas and electricity charges?
Caley McKernan
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up9:37 AM, 19th July 2024, About 4 months ago
But who will you be selling to- large portfolio landlords. They know they cannot enforce any of the measures- landlords cannot be forced to take pets, landlords cannot be forced to take benefits. It would be left to the councils to take landlords to court. They do not have the time and the money. Who would fund an individual claimants case to challenge a landlord.
Politicians say what the public want to hear but it is not actually enforceable. Maybe large portfolio landlords will be more sympathetic. I have seen private developers marketing pet friendly accommodation.
Just like Tesos takes out the small shop owner competition by selling world foods or even now print shops. Large portfolio landlords might be prepared to take the hit of any risks pets bring.
Labour has a plan to follow.
Cider Drinker
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up9:45 AM, 19th July 2024, About 4 months ago
Tenants can already object to rent increases.
What is a fair rent for a property costing £250k?
Just 6% might cover the mortgage interest and a return on the landlord’s initial investment. So, that £15k per year. Add on insurances, letting fees, repairs, maintenance, legal fees, void periods, SDLT, Selective Licensing, EICR, membership of NRLA, various courses, CGT on inflation and risk and suddenly, that £250k property justifies a rent of £20k per year (or more).
Much easier to invest in savings accounts.
dismayed landlord
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up10:16 AM, 19th July 2024, About 4 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Cider Drinker at 19/07/2024 - 09:45
Add on the stress and I’ll be drinking cider too!
Ian Narbeth
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up10:17 AM, 19th July 2024, About 4 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Cider Drinker at 19/07/2024 - 09:45"What is a fair rent for a property costing £250k?" is, with respect, the wrong question. What is a fair price for a pair of sneakers costing $4 to make in China. What is the fair price for a kilo of pasta or for a cow that's brought to market?
The fair price is the market price determined by willing buyers and willing sellers competing for the product or service.
Keir Starmer says he doesn't want tenants being asked to bid against each other. What next? Ban auctions because buyers are bidding against each other?
If Labour bring this in, I predict rents will rise dramatically. Instead of a property being advertised at £1500 and a tenant offering £1550 to secure it (with the landlord being threatened with prison or a £30,000 fine if he accepts the offer), that same property will be offered at £1750 and then the asking price reduced, Dutch Auction style.
If you want a fair market that operates efficiently, don't interfere with it. The Tories have already interfered by loading costs and risks onto landlords and by not fixing a broken court system. If Labour persecutes landlords, they will pull their properties from the market. The way to encourage landlords to stay in and to enter the market is not to limit rent increases.
Ron H-W
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up10:19 AM, 19th July 2024, About 4 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Cider Drinker at 19/07/2024 - 09:45
I think you've forgotten something: service charges (and maybe ground rent), especially for flats & maisonettes. That's likely to be an extra £2K.
Also the cost of an EPC every 10 years, and an annual Gas Safety certificate if there is a gas supply, though these are NOT significant.
"Typically, service charges for flats tend to be in the region of £1,000 to £2,000 per year – however, they can often exceed £2,000 ..."
from https://www.redbrickpm.co.uk/blog/how-are-the-average-service-charges-for-flats-calculated/
"In the UK, the average service charge for a flat is between £1,000-£2,000 per year, although this number can differ depending on the size, age, and location of the property."
from https://www.housingandproperty.co.uk/site/blog/hplp-articles/what-is-a-reasonable-service-charge
Cider Drinker
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up10:34 AM, 19th July 2024, About 4 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Ron H-W at 19/07/2024 - 10:19
Thanks Ron.
I don’t do flats so these costs never crossed my mind.
Reluctant Landlord
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up11:27 AM, 19th July 2024, About 4 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Ian Narbeth at 19/07/2024 - 10:17
technically T's don't bid against each other.
Reality
LL puts a house up for let. Rent is advertised at £1000pcm. Applications arrive. Prospective T No1 offers £1200 in what THEY SEE as a way of securing the accommodation. That's their choice.
Nothing' illegal' for a LL to accept.
The LL would still need to go through full affordability &referencing etc to see if they can meet the rent offer anyway that the T THEMSELVES MADE.
A sensible LL would never let to anyone who doesn't meet affordability no matter what they offer - above or below the advertised rate.
All this is, is another thing to show that all PRS LL's are just focussing on the rental income. Money grabbing. Shows total naivety/stupidity/both
A T could offer £2k a month but if they have no referencing history, negative credit report etc they wont be getting the keys!
LaLo
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up11:31 AM, 19th July 2024, About 4 months ago
Picture this :- A tenant comes along with a pet elephant that the LL can’t refuse. The elephant walks in and goes straight through the floor which fractures the gas pipes and causes electric’s to spark. The house explodes causing fires to adjoining properties that spread sparking flames in to the underground gas supply pipes causing the whole city to go up in flames. The interconnected gas pipes to all cities causes the whole country to go up in flames. The main gas supply pipes from Russia and all interconnected countries causes the whole world to go up in flames. The planet is now dead! All this because some ……… in the government says pets can’t be refused!
Ian Narbeth
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up11:42 AM, 19th July 2024, About 4 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Reluctant Landlord at 19/07/2024 - 11:27
"technically T's don't bid against each other."
That is not correct and if it were a law against it would be logically impossible.
It is perfectly possible that a landlord might receive two offers, one at £1200 a month and one at £1250. He might then ask the bidder at £1200 if he/she is prepared to bid higher than £1250. Alternatively, the landlord might receive two offers at the same price and then invite both to increase their bids. That is what Labour wants to ban.
dismayed landlord
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!
Sign Up11:45 AM, 19th July 2024, About 4 months ago
If you were selling a car you would not be banned or classed as a criminal for accepting the buyers highest bid. Why keep picking on landlords!!