Lord Frost criticises Renters (Reform) Bill in the Lords

Lord Frost criticises Renters (Reform) Bill in the Lords

0:01 AM, 17th May 2024, About 2 months ago 3

Text Size

Leading Conservative politician Lord Frost has voiced his concerns over the Renters (Reform) Bill by saying it is a ‘poor Bill’ and blasted the Tories.

Lord Frost was the UK’s chief Brexit negotiator and in the House of Lords second reading debate, he said: “It is a poor Bill and I do not think it is getting any better as it proceeds through the Commons and through this House.

“It is inevitably going to make the private rented sector smaller and more expensive.

“It is pursued from the best of motives, but its consequences will be that housing supply shrinks and the cost of housing goes up.”

Bill will generate more social problems

Lord Frost also told the House that the Bill will generate more social problems than it solves.

He added: “I am sorry that the Government are pursuing it, but I hope that it will still be possible in Committee to improve on some of the fundamental points that I have mentioned, and in particular to retain fixed-term tenancies as an option.”

He also criticised the attack on private landlords in his speech through the tax regime and the shrinking rental sector.

‘Attack on private landlords through the tax regime ‘

Lord Frost said: “There has been an attack on private landlords through the tax regime and the rental sector is shrinking.

“That, plus anticipation of the measures in this Bill, is taking private rental property off the market.

“It is therefore no surprise that, while sale prices for houses are flat, we are seeing rental prices in the private sector accelerate by 9%.”

Practical concerns over the Bill

He continued: “I have philosophical concerns — that I think it is fundamentally unconservative, speaking as a Conservative politician — and I have practical concerns.

“Namely, that it ties up and restricts the market still further and the practical effect will be to make things worse, not better.

“I regret that I must speak in these terms of a Bill that my own Government are bringing forward, but I think it is extremely problematic.”

He says that a better housing market is needed for secure housing and ‘reliable tenancies’.

Lord Frost also expressed concerns over the restrictions that the Bill brings in on the use of property.

Abolishing Section 21 ‘no-fault’ evictions

Lord Frost said he accepts the Conservatives are committed to abolishing Section 21 ‘no-fault’ evictions.

He went on: “We did not commit to end fixed-term tenancies, and they are not the same thing.

“Section 21 is a way, among other things, of ensuring that landlords can reliably get possession, after the first 12 months in an AST, at two months’ notice.

“If we abolish Section 21, another way of providing some certainty for landlords that they could get their property back would be to leave open the option of agreeing another fixed-term tenancy, for another year or whatever.

“The Bill removes that option. It scraps fixed-term tenancies entirely and makes every tenancy rolling, bringing in the possibility that landlords will have to go to court much more often to recover their property.”

The Bill now moves to the Committee stage, before the report stage and then to its final third reading before heading back to the Commons.


Share This Article


Comments

philip allen

17:14 PM, 18th May 2024, About 2 months ago

Here, here................Or, as this seems to be an educated politician, should that be, hear, hear?

Old Mrs Landlord

16:43 PM, 19th May 2024, About 2 months ago

Shout more loudly Lord Frost. It is indeed the deadly combination of universal rolling tenancies from inception with abolition of Section 21 which effectively hands permanent control of the landlord's property to the tenant, with no remedy for the landlord but to sell. The supply of property to rent will undoubtedlly dwindle iover the coming months and years as tenants' circumstances change necessitating a move to more suitable premises. I also foresee many overcrowded rentals as families expand but tenants cannot find or cannot afford more spacious accommodation.
By the way Philip Allen, yes it should be "hear, hear" which is what honourable members shout in the House when they agree with a point made by another politician and want others to take note .

Stella

17:29 PM, 19th May 2024, About 2 months ago

Thank you Lord Frost you are the voice of reason!
How can the PRS function with so many obstacles and restrictions.
For example if we need to sell our property it will not be a mandatory ground, we will be at the mercy of a Judge who may or may not give permission.

Leave Comments

In order to post comments you will need to Sign In or Sign Up for a FREE Membership

or

Don't have an account? Sign Up

Landlord Tax Planning Book Now