2025: A perfect storm for landlords AND tenants?

2025: A perfect storm for landlords AND tenants?

8:41 AM, 3rd January 2025, About 4 days ago 20

Text Size

Oh, dear. It’s 2025 and the private rented sector is set for one of its biggest upheavals in years – possibly decades.

Landlords are facing unprecedented challenges, thanks to the Renters’ Rights Bill and EPC deadline nonsense, but there’s more for small landlords, in particular, to consider.

If you are a tenant reading this, then please share on social media and remember to copy in the likes of Generation Rent and Shelter. Even if you don’t agree with what might/will happen this year, you’ll need this to refer back to next January.

I’m predicting higher rents, empty rental homes, landlords bailing out and a definite shift towards large institutional landlords making their presence felt.

That’s all good, right? Big landlords with large estates mean more choice? Wrong. More choice means lower rents. Wrong again.

Smaller landlords leaving the PRS is great news, right? Nope. Fewer smaller landlords mean selling up and the remaining landlords putting rents up to meet higher costs.

Plus, with stronger demand for fewer homes, guess what will happen to rents?

Unintended consequences of policy initiatives

I refer often to politicians not understanding the unintended consequences of their policy initiatives.

This became apparent with the Renters (Reform) Bill and now the scary Renters’ Rights Bill.

Years of disinformation mean that tenants, tenant activist groups, the media and politicians don’t understand what will happen with some of their crazy ideas.

I accept that politicians often introduce regulations with good intentions, but without fully considering the knock-on effects.

A prime example is the Renters’ Rights Bill, which aims to improve tenant protections. Who can argue with that?

However, by removing Section 21 ‘no-fault’ evictions – we really need to start calling this ‘no reason given’ because there is almost always a reason – landlords fear being trapped in lengthy legal battles to evict tenants.

It’s a bad eviction process now and with the inept clowns of Labour in charge, it will get worse.

If we can’t get possession of a rented property, why bother renting it out?

It might sound like great news that tenants can’t be ‘turfed out onto the streets’, as Shelter often declares, especially for those renters not paying rent, naturally, but what about the landlord?

Such a move will make us more risk-averse in our tenant selection (forget Labour’s plan to protect families, tenants with pets and those on benefits – it ain’t happening).

It will also potentially lead to a surge in evictions before the law changes.

The unintended consequence of banning Section 21 will, inevitably, mean MORE evictions will take place this year.

Cost of compliance with new regulations

Then we have the cost of compliance with new regulations – which includes the barmy idea that councils can introduce the selective licensing of rented homes if they want to.

That means the good landlords will comply and tenants will pay for the licence, while criminal landlords dodge another bullet.

Coupled with rising interest rates and maintenance costs, landlords’ profit margins are being squeezed.

But that’s OK isn’t it because no one should be exploiting tenants.

Except we run a business, not a social charity and we have bills to meet in running a rental property.

With an EPC rating of C being required for rented homes by 2030 (after Labour have long been voted out) means that the running costs for lots of us are going to rise.

The prospect is already forcing many smaller landlords out of the market, which reduces the supply of rental housing.

As demand outstrips supply, rents will rise, putting a strain on tenants and potentially discouraging new landlords from investing.

The departure of smaller landlords could also lead to a consolidation of the PRS with large institutional investors becoming the dominant players.

But that’s good, right?

No, actually, it’s not. This could result in a lack of competition, leading to higher rents and less flexibility for tenants.

Tenants also need to appreciate that institutional landlords will definitely be using strict criteria for selecting tenants. They won’t be interested in benefit tenants.

PRS is facing a perfect storm

So, my big prediction for 2025 is that the private rented sector is facing a perfect storm.

There will be more empty homes as landlords try to sell, higher rents and a less diverse landlord market are all on the horizon.

The government – and the utter clown show of the previous administration – must take responsibility for the unintended consequences of its policies.

It needs to strike a balance between protecting tenants’ rights and ensuring a healthy and competitive rental market.

This could involve simplifying regulations, dropping the EPC mandate, reintroducing tax relief and supporting small landlords instead of vilifying us.

The future of the private rented sector is uncertain, but landlords will try their best to navigate the challenges and continue to provide quality housing to tenants.

Those that can’t face the storm have left, or will leave, but for most tenants they’ll have a landlord to depend on, one who respects them and provides a quality, safe home.

You won’t read about the majority of good, decent landlords or see us on TV news reports, but we are here and despite the efforts of our second-rate politicians, we will try to be here for years to come.

That is to provide you and your family with a home that is comfortable and well-maintained. Don’t believe the negative comments that we are all bad – just like our tenants, most of us are good but the media and tenant activist groups only focus on the awful ones.

Until next time,

The Landlord Crusader


Share This Article


Comments

PH

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

20:45 PM, 3rd January 2025, About 3 days ago

Reply to the comment left by geester24 at 03/01/2025 - 17:30
To have a tiny effect the whole of the UK should be roped in to all this nonsense but they won't do that, the tenanted properties will have zero effect .

JB

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

8:17 AM, 4th January 2025, About 3 days ago

Reply to the comment left by PH at 03/01/2025 - 20:45
And as usual, the tenants will pay the price

Cider Drinker

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

9:55 AM, 4th January 2025, About 3 days ago

I planned for my retirement and I am faced with a choice.
I can choose to keep my tenants in safe, fully compliant EPC Rated C properties and the rent funds my retirement (despite making a loss in 24/25) due to a bad tenant).
Alternatively, I can evict my tenants and sell the properties. No mortgages and a bit of CGT to pay but I’d have a decent bit left over to invest elsewhere (perhaps BTR shares bit more likely, safe cash ISAs). I’d need around 3% to replace the rental income.
Of course, I’d miss out on any house price inflation but I’d be protected from house price deflation (it could happen) and I’d never have a bad tenant ever again.
My death would be much easier to manage as my kids would probably prefer cash rather than property.
So, bring it on. I don’t care if I sell or keep my properties. If anything, I’d love to sell them and lose the responsibility of housing so many people.

JB

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

20:48 PM, 4th January 2025, About 2 days ago

Reply to the comment left by Cider Drinker at 04/01/2025 - 09:55
I agree. Who needs the hassle? My kids have made it clear that with all the meddling the government have done, they really are not interested in carry my business forward. Who would blame them?

Crouchender

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

21:07 PM, 4th January 2025, About 2 days ago

Reply to the comment left by JB at 04/01/2025 - 20:48
One of the 'unintended consequences' of all the Labour anti growth polices is not being reelected in 2029!

NewYorkie

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

22:26 PM, 4th January 2025, About 2 days ago

Reply to the comment left by Crouchender at 04/01/2025 - 21:07
But imagine the damage they will do while they are in power.

PAUL BARTLETT

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

2:24 AM, 5th January 2025, About 2 days ago

The only winners in all of this are the Banks who get to impose greater costs on BTL mortgages, and be the corporate investors taking over suitable property from PRS, or lending to the FTBs willing to buy the unsuitable property.
Both government and banks get plausible deniability to the voters.Not worth the risk or effort.
I've already Section 21'd so am on the way out. F 'em all.

Cider Drinker

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

16:53 PM, 5th January 2025, About A day ago

Reply to the comment left by PAUL BARTLETT at 05/01/2025 - 02:24
Banks will impose higher BTl mortgage rates to cover their increased risk.

Corporate investors are good news in so far as they don’t suffer the same emotive decision making that private investors have. They don’t evict tenants when things get tough.

Crouchender

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

16:56 PM, 5th January 2025, About A day ago

Reply to the comment left by Cider Drinker at 05/01/2025 - 16:53
BTR tenants are different market (young profs) anyway and tends to stay only for max 3 years so hardly eviction risk

NewYorkie

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments, posts and send them messages!

Sign Up

17:44 PM, 5th January 2025, About A day ago

Reply to the comment left by Crouchender at 05/01/2025 - 16:56
Yes, BTR is not catering for the same demographic as BTL 'classic'.

Leave Comments

In order to post comments you will need to Sign In or Sign Up for a FREE Membership

or

Don't have an account? Sign Up

Landlord Automated Assistant Read More